A Click of Faith: How Perceived Trustworthiness Affects Online Risk-Taking in Unfamiliar Dyads.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1080/00224545.2025.2464736
Lina Hillner, Lorraine Hope, Feni Kontogianni, Stacey Conchie
{"title":"A Click of Faith: How Perceived Trustworthiness Affects Online Risk-Taking in Unfamiliar Dyads.","authors":"Lina Hillner, Lorraine Hope, Feni Kontogianni, Stacey Conchie","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2025.2464736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceptions of trustworthiness foster feelings of swift trust and, in turn, yield positive outcomes in virtual teams. However, limited research has investigated the effects of trustworthiness on trust formation and online risk-taking in unfamiliar dyads. We manipulated the <i>trustworthiness</i> of a pseudo-player (untrustworthy vs trustworthy) in the first of two interactive online games and recorded the participant's risk-taking behaviour (number of high-risk decisions and investment size) in the second game. We expected a direct and a trust-mediated effect of untrustworthiness on risk-taking. Although our preregistered hypotheses were not supported, exploratory analyses revealed that participants playing with the untrustworthy player were less willing to trust them and, in turn, took significantly fewer high-risk decisions during the <i>first phase</i> of the second game than participants playing with the trustworthy player. No effect was found for investment size. Our results suggest that perceptions of trustworthiness <i>indirectly</i> influence online risk-taking behaviour by informing trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"437-451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2464736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceptions of trustworthiness foster feelings of swift trust and, in turn, yield positive outcomes in virtual teams. However, limited research has investigated the effects of trustworthiness on trust formation and online risk-taking in unfamiliar dyads. We manipulated the trustworthiness of a pseudo-player (untrustworthy vs trustworthy) in the first of two interactive online games and recorded the participant's risk-taking behaviour (number of high-risk decisions and investment size) in the second game. We expected a direct and a trust-mediated effect of untrustworthiness on risk-taking. Although our preregistered hypotheses were not supported, exploratory analyses revealed that participants playing with the untrustworthy player were less willing to trust them and, in turn, took significantly fewer high-risk decisions during the first phase of the second game than participants playing with the trustworthy player. No effect was found for investment size. Our results suggest that perceptions of trustworthiness indirectly influence online risk-taking behaviour by informing trust.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信念的点击:感知的可信度如何影响不熟悉的二人组的在线冒险。
对可信赖性的认知培养了迅速的信任感,进而在虚拟团队中产生积极的结果。然而,有限的研究调查了信任对不熟悉的二人组的信任形成和在线冒险的影响。我们在两个互动网络游戏中的第一个游戏中操纵了一个伪玩家(不可信vs可信)的可信度,并记录了参与者在第二个游戏中的冒险行为(高风险决策的数量和投资规模)。我们预期不可信度对风险承担具有直接和信任中介效应。虽然我们预先登记的假设没有得到支持,但探索性分析显示,与不值得信任的玩家一起玩的参与者不太愿意信任他们,反过来,在第二个游戏的第一阶段,与值得信任的玩家一起玩的参与者相比,他们做出的高风险决策明显更少。没有发现投资规模的影响。我们的研究结果表明,可信度的感知通过告知信任间接影响在线冒险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Psychology
Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.
期刊最新文献
The interactive effect of common ingroup identity and stereotypic perceptions on outgroup admiration and intergroup reconciliation. Drinking to belong: how loneliness fuels alcohol-related consequences. Playing it down: the hidden game of income understating. Materialism amid uncertainty: how intolerance of uncertainty shapes value shifts before and during the pandemic. The politics of the paranormal: the relationship between paranormal beliefs and right-wing ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1