Process evaluation of the Hockey Fans in Training lifestyle intervention (for men with overweight or obesity).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibaf002
Wendy M Blunt, Marisa L Kfrerer, Dawn P Gill, Katie J Shillington, Brendan Riggin, Jennifer D Irwin, Brooke Bliss, Robert J Petrella
{"title":"Process evaluation of the Hockey Fans in Training lifestyle intervention (for men with overweight or obesity).","authors":"Wendy M Blunt, Marisa L Kfrerer, Dawn P Gill, Katie J Shillington, Brendan Riggin, Jennifer D Irwin, Brooke Bliss, Robert J Petrella","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the proven relationship between lifestyle and morbidity and mortality, rates of chronic disease (e.g. obesity) continue to rise in paradox to the myriad of studies supporting lifestyle behaviour change. Men have been less likely to seek out preventative care or lifestyle programs, putting them at risk. In response, Hockey Fans In Training (Hockey FIT) was developed as a group-based, lifestyle intervention leveraging the draw of hockey fandom to engage middle-aged men with overweight or obesity in lifestyle change. Encouraging pilot study results informed the optimization and delivery of the intervention through a cluster randomized controlled trial in 42 sites in Canada and the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A process evaluation was conducted to evaluate intervention acceptability and fidelity and adaptations. Community-based sites were randomly allocated to Hockey FIT intervention (immediate program start) or wait-list control (12-month delay). Qualitative process evaluation data were collected from intervention sites and included seven virtual participant focus groups and one interview (n = 35 participants), open-ended participant feedback questionnaires (n = 316), interviews with program coaches (n = 22), post-session coach reflections (n = 233), and interviews with implementation partners (n = 16). A process of content analysis by question was performed and data saturation was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes fell into the following categories: (i) motivations for joining Hockey FIT; (ii) effective program components; and (iii) adaptations and suggested improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The process evaluation detailed success engaging men in lifestyle change using sport fandom, and the importance of capitalizing further on competition within groups to drive behavioural change through user-friendly supports and greater engagement with hockey.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03636282.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the proven relationship between lifestyle and morbidity and mortality, rates of chronic disease (e.g. obesity) continue to rise in paradox to the myriad of studies supporting lifestyle behaviour change. Men have been less likely to seek out preventative care or lifestyle programs, putting them at risk. In response, Hockey Fans In Training (Hockey FIT) was developed as a group-based, lifestyle intervention leveraging the draw of hockey fandom to engage middle-aged men with overweight or obesity in lifestyle change. Encouraging pilot study results informed the optimization and delivery of the intervention through a cluster randomized controlled trial in 42 sites in Canada and the USA.

Methods: A process evaluation was conducted to evaluate intervention acceptability and fidelity and adaptations. Community-based sites were randomly allocated to Hockey FIT intervention (immediate program start) or wait-list control (12-month delay). Qualitative process evaluation data were collected from intervention sites and included seven virtual participant focus groups and one interview (n = 35 participants), open-ended participant feedback questionnaires (n = 316), interviews with program coaches (n = 22), post-session coach reflections (n = 233), and interviews with implementation partners (n = 16). A process of content analysis by question was performed and data saturation was reached.

Results: Themes fell into the following categories: (i) motivations for joining Hockey FIT; (ii) effective program components; and (iii) adaptations and suggested improvements.

Conclusions: The process evaluation detailed success engaging men in lifestyle change using sport fandom, and the importance of capitalizing further on competition within groups to drive behavioural change through user-friendly supports and greater engagement with hockey.

Clinical trial information: ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03636282.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
训练中冰球球迷生活方式干预的过程评价(针对超重或肥胖男性)。
背景:尽管生活方式与发病率和死亡率之间的关系已得到证实,但与支持改变生活方式行为的无数研究相反,慢性疾病(如肥胖)的发病率继续上升。男性不太可能寻求预防保健或生活方式计划,这使他们处于危险之中。作为回应,冰球爱好者训练(Hockey FIT)被开发为一种基于群体的生活方式干预,利用冰球爱好者的吸引力,让超重或肥胖的中年男性参与改变生活方式。通过在加拿大和美国的42个地点进行的集群随机对照试验,令人鼓舞的试点研究结果为干预措施的优化和交付提供了信息。方法:采用过程评价法评价干预的可接受性、保真度和适应性。以社区为基础的站点被随机分配到Hockey FIT干预组(立即开始项目)或等候名单组(延迟12个月)。定性过程评估数据从干预站点收集,包括7个虚拟参与者焦点小组和1个访谈(n = 35名参与者),开放式参与者反馈问卷(n = 316),与项目教练的访谈(n = 22),会后教练反思(n = 233)和与实施伙伴的访谈(n = 16)。通过问题进行内容分析,达到数据饱和。结果:主题分为以下几类:(i)加入Hockey FIT的动机;(ii)有效的方案组成部分;(三)调整和建议的改进。结论:该过程评估详细说明了利用体育迷改变男性生活方式的成功,以及通过用户友好的支持和更多的冰球参与,进一步利用群体内的竞争来推动行为改变的重要性。临床试验信息:ClinicalTrials.gov。ID: NCT03636282。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
Incentivizing social support in the randomized mobile Lifestyle Intervention for Food and Exercise study: the impact of gamification on social support perceptions, provision, and receipt. Social determinants of health influence maternal health behaviors and engagement in an obesity prevention intervention. Identifying effective behavior change techniques in interventions for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies and/or practices to prevent chronic disease in students: a secondary analysis of a systematic review. Building research evidence for advancing prevention and translation: reflecting on a 20-year organizational approach of applied chronic disease preventive health research. Mapping the type, frequency, intensity, temporality, and pathways of dissemination strategies during the national scale-up of TransformUs Secondary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1