The Relationship Between Anxiety and Readiness Levels Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Midwives: An Intergenerational Comparative Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001269
Ayşe Nur Yilmaz, Sümeyye Altiparmak, Remziye Sökmen
{"title":"The Relationship Between Anxiety and Readiness Levels Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Midwives: An Intergenerational Comparative Study.","authors":"Ayşe Nur Yilmaz, Sümeyye Altiparmak, Remziye Sökmen","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare Generations X, Y, and Z in terms of anxiety and readiness levels regarding artificial intelligence and investigate the relationship between anxiety and readiness levels regarding artificial intelligence in midwives across generations. This study is cross-sectional and comparative with a study sample of 218 midwives working in a province in the east of Turkey. Data were collected with the \"Personal Information Form,\" \"Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale,\" and \"Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale.\" The evaluation of the data was carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) package program. Descriptive statistics, a one-way analysis of variance test, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The total mean score of midwives from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale was 47.07 ± 12.10 in Generation X, 43.91 ± 12.63 in Generation Y, and 36.16 ± 12.61 in Generation Z (P < .05), and the difference between the groups was significant. Generation X had a higher level of artificial intelligence anxiety than Generation Y, and Generation Y had higher levels of artificial intelligence than Generation Z. The total mean score of midwives from the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale was 67.43 ± 14.28 in Generation X, 66.78 ± 17.83 in Generation Y, and 74.73 ± 16.15 in Generation Z (P < .05), and the difference between the groups was significant. Generation Z is more ready for medical artificial intelligence than Generation X, and Generation X is more ready for medical artificial intelligence than Generation Y. In addition, in the regression analysis, there was a weakly negative and significant relationship between the mean scores of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale and Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale in Generation Z midwives, and as artificial intelligence anxiety levels increased, medical artificial intelligence readiness levels decreased. The artificial intelligence anxiety levels of midwives differed by generation, being highest in Generation X and lowest in Generation Z, and the level of medical artificial intelligence readiness was highest in Generation Z and lowest in Generation Y. As artificial intelligence anxiety increased in Generation Z midwives, the level of medical artificial intelligence readiness decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare Generations X, Y, and Z in terms of anxiety and readiness levels regarding artificial intelligence and investigate the relationship between anxiety and readiness levels regarding artificial intelligence in midwives across generations. This study is cross-sectional and comparative with a study sample of 218 midwives working in a province in the east of Turkey. Data were collected with the "Personal Information Form," "Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale," and "Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale." The evaluation of the data was carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) package program. Descriptive statistics, a one-way analysis of variance test, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The total mean score of midwives from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale was 47.07 ± 12.10 in Generation X, 43.91 ± 12.63 in Generation Y, and 36.16 ± 12.61 in Generation Z (P < .05), and the difference between the groups was significant. Generation X had a higher level of artificial intelligence anxiety than Generation Y, and Generation Y had higher levels of artificial intelligence than Generation Z. The total mean score of midwives from the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale was 67.43 ± 14.28 in Generation X, 66.78 ± 17.83 in Generation Y, and 74.73 ± 16.15 in Generation Z (P < .05), and the difference between the groups was significant. Generation Z is more ready for medical artificial intelligence than Generation X, and Generation X is more ready for medical artificial intelligence than Generation Y. In addition, in the regression analysis, there was a weakly negative and significant relationship between the mean scores of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale and Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale in Generation Z midwives, and as artificial intelligence anxiety levels increased, medical artificial intelligence readiness levels decreased. The artificial intelligence anxiety levels of midwives differed by generation, being highest in Generation X and lowest in Generation Z, and the level of medical artificial intelligence readiness was highest in Generation Z and lowest in Generation Y. As artificial intelligence anxiety increased in Generation Z midwives, the level of medical artificial intelligence readiness decreased.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional Analysis of Zoom Fatigue on Clinical Decision-making in Nursing Students. The Effect of Game-Based Technology on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Knowledge and Motivation: Mixed-Methods Study. A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Nurse Burnout and Satisfaction With the Electronic Health Record. A Phased Competency Model for Electronic Health Record Usability. Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile App-Based Chatbot for the Self-management of Physical Activity for Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1