Predictors for Successful Weaning from Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S482316
Zhisheng Duan, Heping Xie, Huaping Zhong, Shuo Hu, Xu Chen, Ziyou Liu
{"title":"Predictors for Successful Weaning from Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Zhisheng Duan, Heping Xie, Huaping Zhong, Shuo Hu, Xu Chen, Ziyou Liu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S482316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the predictors of successful weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) among patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in our centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of patients with severe ARDS who were treated with VV-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Due to the outcomes of weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the considered patients with ARDS were divided into a successful weaning group and an unsuccessful weaning group. Logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate predictors for successful VV-ECMO weaning among patients with severe ARDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 patients with severe ARDS were included for analysis. Among them, 31 (47.69%) patients were grouped into the successful weaning group, while 34 (52.30%) patients were grouped into the unsuccessful weaning group. Univariate analysis showed that Age (odds ratio [OR] =0.939; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.896-0.983; <i>p</i> = 0.008), APACHEII scores before ECMO (OR =0.651; 95% CI =0.537-0.789; <i>p</i> < 0.001), Renal insufficiency (OR =0.061; 95% CI =0.012 -0.298; <i>p</i> = 0.001), MAP before ECMO (OR =1.246; 95% CI =1.114-1.392; <i>p</i><0.001), PaO2 during ECMO (OR =1.083; 95% CI =1.033-1.135; <i>p</i> = 0.001), and CRRT (OR =0.080; 95% CI =0.022-0.285; <i>p</i> = 0.008) were identified as an independent predictor of successful VV-ECMO weaning. After multivariate analysis was performed, APACHE II scores before ECMO (OR = 0.651; 95% CI = 0.462-0.919; <i>p</i> = 0.015) were identified as independent predictors for successful VV-ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in severe ARDS patients, lower APACHE II scores predicted successful wean from VV-ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"471-477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S482316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the predictors of successful weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) among patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in our centre.

Methods: The clinical data of patients with severe ARDS who were treated with VV-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Due to the outcomes of weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the considered patients with ARDS were divided into a successful weaning group and an unsuccessful weaning group. Logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate predictors for successful VV-ECMO weaning among patients with severe ARDS.

Results: A total of 65 patients with severe ARDS were included for analysis. Among them, 31 (47.69%) patients were grouped into the successful weaning group, while 34 (52.30%) patients were grouped into the unsuccessful weaning group. Univariate analysis showed that Age (odds ratio [OR] =0.939; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.896-0.983; p = 0.008), APACHEII scores before ECMO (OR =0.651; 95% CI =0.537-0.789; p < 0.001), Renal insufficiency (OR =0.061; 95% CI =0.012 -0.298; p = 0.001), MAP before ECMO (OR =1.246; 95% CI =1.114-1.392; p<0.001), PaO2 during ECMO (OR =1.083; 95% CI =1.033-1.135; p = 0.001), and CRRT (OR =0.080; 95% CI =0.022-0.285; p = 0.008) were identified as an independent predictor of successful VV-ECMO weaning. After multivariate analysis was performed, APACHE II scores before ECMO (OR = 0.651; 95% CI = 0.462-0.919; p = 0.015) were identified as independent predictors for successful VV-ECMO weaning.

Conclusion: In conclusion, in severe ARDS patients, lower APACHE II scores predicted successful wean from VV-ECMO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者成功脱离静脉-静脉体外膜氧合的预测因素。
目的:本研究旨在探讨严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)成功脱机的预测因素。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年1月间VV-ECMO治疗的重症ARDS患者的临床资料。根据体外膜氧合(ECMO)脱机的结果,将考虑的ARDS患者分为脱机成功组和脱机不成功组。采用Logistic回归分析评估严重ARDS患者VV-ECMO成功脱机的预测因素。结果:共纳入65例重症ARDS患者进行分析。其中31例(47.69%)患者归为断奶成功组,34例(52.30%)患者归为断奶不成功组。单因素分析显示,年龄(比值比[OR] =0.939;95%置信区间[CI] =0.896-0.983;p = 0.008), ECMO前APACHEII评分(OR =0.651;95% ci =0.537-0.789;p < 0.001),肾功能不全(OR =0.061;95% ci =0.012 -0.298;p = 0.001), ECMO前MAP (OR =1.246;95% ci =1.114-1.392;pp = 0.001), CRRT (OR =0.080;95% ci =0.022-0.285;p = 0.008)被确定为VV-ECMO成功脱机的独立预测因子。经多因素分析,ECMO前APACHE II评分(OR = 0.651;95% ci = 0.462-0.919;p = 0.015)被认为是VV-ECMO成功脱机的独立预测因素。结论:在严重ARDS患者中,较低的APACHE II评分预示着VV-ECMO的成功戒断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Functional Capacity and Its Sociodemographic and Health Determinants in Older Adults from a Region of Peru. Associations Between Longitudinal Changes in Frailty and Incident Arthritis: A Multi-Cohort Study. Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Association of Cumulative Average Uric Acid to HDL Cholesterol Ratio with the Risk of Rapidly Declining Renal Function: A Retrospective Community-Based Cohort Study in Shanghai Undertaken on Elderly Subjects with Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Mental Health Literacy and Associated Factors in Ethnic Minority Border Regions of Guangxi, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1