Efficacy and Safety of Cataract Surgery Combined with Ab Interno Canaloplasty and Micro-Trabecular Bypass Stent Surgery in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S504247
Matthew S Porter, Addie Flowers, Brandon P Wood, Mark J Gallardo
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Cataract Surgery Combined with Ab Interno Canaloplasty and Micro-Trabecular Bypass Stent Surgery in Open-Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Matthew S Porter, Addie Flowers, Brandon P Wood, Mark J Gallardo","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S504247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of canaloplasty via an ab-interno technique using the iTrack (Nova Eye Medical, Fremont, USA) combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery with the Hydrus microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) following cataract surgery (CE) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, two-center, case series of 51 POAG eyes that underwent phacoemulsification followed by canaloplasty combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery. Eyes were categorized according to IOP and disease severity. A subgroup of patients on 3+ medications at baseline was included. Primary end points included the mean IOP and mean number of medications at 12 months, 24 months and at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline IOP (mmHg) and number of medications were 19.1±4.0 and 2.3±1.2 and reduced to 13.9±2.6 (p<0.001) and 1.2±1.4 (p<0.001) at 12 months, 13.7±2.0 and 1.5±1.5 (p<0.001, p=0.008, respectively) at 24 months (n=31) and 14.4±3.2 and 2.1±1.5 (p<0.001, p=0.5, respectively) at 36 months. In the uncontrolled group (n=27), baseline IOP and number of medications were 21.9±3.1 and 1.9±1.3 and reduced to 14.6±4.2 (p=0.006) and 1.7±1.6 (p=0.821) at 36 months postoperatively. Baseline IOP and number of medications of severe patients (n=12) were 19.0±4.8 and 1.9±1.1. IOP reduced to 12.8±2.4 (p=0.005) at 12 months while the number of medications did not show any statistically significant change: 1.9±1.6 (p=0.4). No eyes underwent additional glaucoma surgery in the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Canaloplasty combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery following cataract extraction demonstrated efficacy in reducing IOP and medication burden up to 24 months postoperatively. IOP reduction was also sustained up to 36 months postoperatively. The combined MIGS procedure is also effective in eyes with uncontrolled glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"469-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S504247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of canaloplasty via an ab-interno technique using the iTrack (Nova Eye Medical, Fremont, USA) combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery with the Hydrus microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) following cataract surgery (CE) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: A retrospective, two-center, case series of 51 POAG eyes that underwent phacoemulsification followed by canaloplasty combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery. Eyes were categorized according to IOP and disease severity. A subgroup of patients on 3+ medications at baseline was included. Primary end points included the mean IOP and mean number of medications at 12 months, 24 months and at the last follow-up.

Results: Baseline IOP (mmHg) and number of medications were 19.1±4.0 and 2.3±1.2 and reduced to 13.9±2.6 (p<0.001) and 1.2±1.4 (p<0.001) at 12 months, 13.7±2.0 and 1.5±1.5 (p<0.001, p=0.008, respectively) at 24 months (n=31) and 14.4±3.2 and 2.1±1.5 (p<0.001, p=0.5, respectively) at 36 months. In the uncontrolled group (n=27), baseline IOP and number of medications were 21.9±3.1 and 1.9±1.3 and reduced to 14.6±4.2 (p=0.006) and 1.7±1.6 (p=0.821) at 36 months postoperatively. Baseline IOP and number of medications of severe patients (n=12) were 19.0±4.8 and 1.9±1.1. IOP reduced to 12.8±2.4 (p=0.005) at 12 months while the number of medications did not show any statistically significant change: 1.9±1.6 (p=0.4). No eyes underwent additional glaucoma surgery in the study period.

Conclusion: Canaloplasty combined with microtrabecular bypass stent surgery following cataract extraction demonstrated efficacy in reducing IOP and medication burden up to 24 months postoperatively. IOP reduction was also sustained up to 36 months postoperatively. The combined MIGS procedure is also effective in eyes with uncontrolled glaucoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开角型青光眼白内障手术联合泪道成形术和微裂孔旁路支架手术的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Central Corneal Thickness and Glaucoma Risk: The Importance of Corneal Pachymetry in Screening Adults Over 50 and Glaucoma Suspects. Biocidal Efficacies of Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions Against Gram-Negative Organisms Associated with Lens Case-Associated Corneal Infiltrative Events. High Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in an Outpatient Podiatry Clinic and Associated Barriers to Ophthalmic Care. Intravitreal Plungerless Injector Device (IPLID): An Innovative Intravitreal Injector Device. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Ocular Complications in New-Onset Uveitis: A Study From a Tertiary Referral Center in Northern Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1