Tropical Cyclone-Affected Ocean Surface Winds: A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Altimeter, Scatterometer, Radiometer, and Buoy Measurements

IF 8.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3543359
Jincan Liu;Jie Ding;Jichao Wang
{"title":"Tropical Cyclone-Affected Ocean Surface Winds: A Comparison of Atmospheric Reanalyses With Altimeter, Scatterometer, Radiometer, and Buoy Measurements","authors":"Jincan Liu;Jie Ding;Jichao Wang","doi":"10.1109/TGRS.2025.3543359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates 1985–2017 ocean surface winds from atmospheric reanalysis products, particularly ERA5-12.5, focusing on 673 tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic. Utilizing measurements from ten altimeters, seven scatterometers, 12 radiometers, and NDBC buoys, we perform a comprehensive error analysis through a suite of verification diagnostics involving normalization and successive decomposition. The analysis features detailed comparisons with individual satellite datasets and investigates four factors influencing reanalysis wind speed errors. Our results indicate that traditional interpolation significantly degrades the accuracy of NCEP/NCAR TC wind speeds, while the interpolation of ERA5 (resulting in ERA5-12.5) minimally affects error metrics and increases matched observational data to more than three times. In ERA5-12.5 diagnostics, bias contributes less to overall error than pattern errors, which are mainly driven by phase discrepancies. Additionally, ERA5-12.5 tends to underestimate high wind speeds, with significant underestimation occurring beyond certain wind speed thresholds. Random errors in ERA5-12.5 show minimal variation beyond a threshold distance of approximately 160 km from the TC center; however, they increase sharply as proximity to the TC center decreases. Furthermore, random errors and bias in ERA5-12.5 reveal no clear trends with increasing distance from the coast or over the years.","PeriodicalId":13213,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","volume":"63 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10891907/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates 1985–2017 ocean surface winds from atmospheric reanalysis products, particularly ERA5-12.5, focusing on 673 tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic. Utilizing measurements from ten altimeters, seven scatterometers, 12 radiometers, and NDBC buoys, we perform a comprehensive error analysis through a suite of verification diagnostics involving normalization and successive decomposition. The analysis features detailed comparisons with individual satellite datasets and investigates four factors influencing reanalysis wind speed errors. Our results indicate that traditional interpolation significantly degrades the accuracy of NCEP/NCAR TC wind speeds, while the interpolation of ERA5 (resulting in ERA5-12.5) minimally affects error metrics and increases matched observational data to more than three times. In ERA5-12.5 diagnostics, bias contributes less to overall error than pattern errors, which are mainly driven by phase discrepancies. Additionally, ERA5-12.5 tends to underestimate high wind speeds, with significant underestimation occurring beyond certain wind speed thresholds. Random errors in ERA5-12.5 show minimal variation beyond a threshold distance of approximately 160 km from the TC center; however, they increase sharply as proximity to the TC center decreases. Furthermore, random errors and bias in ERA5-12.5 reveal no clear trends with increasing distance from the coast or over the years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热带气旋影响的海面风:大气再分析与高度计、散射计、辐射计和浮标测量的比较
本研究利用大气再分析产品评估了1985-2017年的海洋表面风,特别是ERA5-12.5,重点关注北大西洋的673个热带气旋(tc)。利用10个高度计、7个散射计、12个辐射计和NDBC浮标的测量结果,我们通过一套涉及归一化和连续分解的验证诊断进行了全面的误差分析。该分析与单个卫星数据集进行了详细的比较,并调查了影响再分析风速误差的四个因素。结果表明,传统插值法显著降低了NCEP/NCAR TC风速的精度,而ERA5插值法(得到ERA5-12.5)对误差指标的影响最小,并使匹配观测数据增加了3倍以上。在ERA5-12.5诊断中,偏差对总体误差的贡献小于模式误差,模式误差主要由相位差异驱动。此外,ERA5-12.5倾向于低估高风速,在超过一定风速阈值时显著低估。ERA5-12.5的随机误差在距离TC中心约160 km的阈值处变化最小;然而,随着靠近TC中心的距离减小,它们急剧增加。此外,ERA5-12.5的随机误差和偏差没有显示出与海岸距离增加或年份增加的明显趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
28.00%
发文量
1912
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (TGRS) is a monthly publication that focuses on the theory, concepts, and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the land, oceans, atmosphere, and space; and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information.
期刊最新文献
SFPL-UnfoldingNet: A Deep Unfolding Network for Super-Resolution of Martian Radar Echoes with Spectral Fidelity and Peak Localization AECM: Attention-Enhanced Cross-Modality for Aerial Image and Video Translation with Vision Transformers Unsupervised VideoSAR Sparse Imaging Using Physically Interpretable Video Tensor Decomposition-Based Deep Prior Building Segmentation of Hazy Aerial Images via Collaborative Decoupling Knowledge Learning An Efficient and Scalable Multigrid Solver for 3-D Natural Source Electromagnetic Diffusion Problems based on Finite Element Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1