D.A. de Waardt , C.L. Mulder , G.A.M. Widdershoven
{"title":"Stakeholder experiences with compulsory treatment at home: A focus-group study","authors":"D.A. de Waardt , C.L. Mulder , G.A.M. Widdershoven","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Since 2020, Dutch mental health legislation has provided scope for compulsory treatment at home (CTH). Unlike compulsory community treatment (CCT), CTH allows for the use of compulsion in a patient's home, and thus not only in hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine several stakeholders' experiences and views regarding CTH and its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four focus-groups were performed: one with patients, one with significant others, one with psychiatrists, and one with a mixed group of stakeholders. The transcripts were analyzed thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified three themes and 16 subthemes. The first theme concerned the potential benefits of CTH, one of which was avoiding admission to hospital. The second theme focused on preconditions for the delivery of CTH, mainly on communication between mental health workers, patients, and significant others; and the importance of a dialogue well in advance of any compulsory care. With regard to the third theme, considerations regarding the delivery of CTH, all stakeholder groups believed that CTH would be most suitable for patients who had a longer history with their treatment team: between them, they would be able to draw up a plan for compulsory care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stakeholders felt that CTH can work for patients with a longer treatment history whose home situation allows for treatment at home. They regard an advance dialogue and jointly drawing up a crisis plan as important preconditions. Overall, CTH can be regarded as an extra option for enabling an individually tailored approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102072"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252725000056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Since 2020, Dutch mental health legislation has provided scope for compulsory treatment at home (CTH). Unlike compulsory community treatment (CCT), CTH allows for the use of compulsion in a patient's home, and thus not only in hospital.
Aim
To examine several stakeholders' experiences and views regarding CTH and its implementation.
Methods
Four focus-groups were performed: one with patients, one with significant others, one with psychiatrists, and one with a mixed group of stakeholders. The transcripts were analyzed thematically.
Results
We identified three themes and 16 subthemes. The first theme concerned the potential benefits of CTH, one of which was avoiding admission to hospital. The second theme focused on preconditions for the delivery of CTH, mainly on communication between mental health workers, patients, and significant others; and the importance of a dialogue well in advance of any compulsory care. With regard to the third theme, considerations regarding the delivery of CTH, all stakeholder groups believed that CTH would be most suitable for patients who had a longer history with their treatment team: between them, they would be able to draw up a plan for compulsory care.
Conclusion
Stakeholders felt that CTH can work for patients with a longer treatment history whose home situation allows for treatment at home. They regard an advance dialogue and jointly drawing up a crisis plan as important preconditions. Overall, CTH can be regarded as an extra option for enabling an individually tailored approach.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
