Adapting wind shear coefficients to urban morphology: Unlocking urban wind energy potential

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106217
Shuai Kong , Yuliang Xiao , Junliang Cao , Zhitao Han
{"title":"Adapting wind shear coefficients to urban morphology: Unlocking urban wind energy potential","authors":"Shuai Kong ,&nbsp;Yuliang Xiao ,&nbsp;Junliang Cao ,&nbsp;Zhitao Han","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The varied roughness of building clusters makes the urban wind rather complex. The current exponential wind profile may not accurately capture the spatial variation of urban wind. This study aims to develop urban morphology-based exponents for the exponential wind profile model to improve the assessment of wind energy in urban areas. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, combined with Local Climate Zones (LCZ), was used to simulate wind fields, validated with field data. The study then analyzed wind field distribution urban morphology, introducing wind shear coefficients adapted for various urban morphologies. The results were compared with the existing wind shear coefficients by assessing the wind power potential. The results indicated that wind shear coefficients increase from urban outskirts to centers, with minimal seasonal variation. The annual average wind shear coefficient peaked at 0.50 in Harbin and 0.49 in Guangzhou. Building density, height, and plot ratio (PR), significantly impacts wind fields. PR showed the strongest correlation with the wind shear coefficient as the determining factor. Wind shear coefficients for low (0.0–1.0), medium (1.0–2.0), and high PR zones (2.0+) were 0.33, 0.38, and 0.41 in Harbin, and 0.30,0.35, and 0.40 in Guangzhou, respectively, providing more accurate estimate of urban wind speed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 106217"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725000940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The varied roughness of building clusters makes the urban wind rather complex. The current exponential wind profile may not accurately capture the spatial variation of urban wind. This study aims to develop urban morphology-based exponents for the exponential wind profile model to improve the assessment of wind energy in urban areas. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, combined with Local Climate Zones (LCZ), was used to simulate wind fields, validated with field data. The study then analyzed wind field distribution urban morphology, introducing wind shear coefficients adapted for various urban morphologies. The results were compared with the existing wind shear coefficients by assessing the wind power potential. The results indicated that wind shear coefficients increase from urban outskirts to centers, with minimal seasonal variation. The annual average wind shear coefficient peaked at 0.50 in Harbin and 0.49 in Guangzhou. Building density, height, and plot ratio (PR), significantly impacts wind fields. PR showed the strongest correlation with the wind shear coefficient as the determining factor. Wind shear coefficients for low (0.0–1.0), medium (1.0–2.0), and high PR zones (2.0+) were 0.33, 0.38, and 0.41 in Harbin, and 0.30,0.35, and 0.40 in Guangzhou, respectively, providing more accurate estimate of urban wind speed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应城市形态的风切变系数:释放城市风能潜力
建筑群的不同粗糙度使城市风变得相当复杂。目前的指数风廓线可能不能准确地反映城市风的空间变化。本研究旨在为指数风廓线模型开发基于城市形态的指数,以改善城市风能的评估。采用天气研究与预报(WRF)模式结合局地气候带(LCZ)对风场进行了模拟,并用现场资料进行了验证。分析了城市风场分布,引入了适合不同城市形态的风切变系数。通过评估风力发电潜力,将结果与现有风切变系数进行比较。结果表明:风切变系数由城郊向中心增大,季节变化最小;年平均风切变系数哈尔滨最高,为0.50,广州最高,为0.49。建筑密度、高度和容积率(PR)对风场有显著影响。PR与风切变系数的相关性最强。低PR区(0.0 ~ 1.0)、中PR区(1.0 ~ 2.0)和高PR区(2.0+)的风切变系数分别为哈尔滨0.33、0.38和0.41,广州0.30、0.35和0.40,能够较准确地估算城市风速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of outdoor thermal comfort research: Integrating climate zones, population groups, and methodological frameworks Coupling effect of urban building clusters and crosswinds on the aerodynamic performance of high-speed maglev trains Multi-objective optimization of urban residential morphology in cold regions based on energy consumption reduction and solar radiation utilization potential enhancement Adding bike simulation capacity to an activity–based travel demand model and testing policy scenarios Incorporating water-energy-carbon constraints into the optimization of urban refined land use: A case study of Zhengzhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1