Redeployment and changes in working patterns of healthcare workers during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12389-2
Zainab Zuzer Lal, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathan Chaloner, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Christopher A Martin, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek
{"title":"Redeployment and changes in working patterns of healthcare workers during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study.","authors":"Zainab Zuzer Lal, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathan Chaloner, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Christopher A Martin, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12389-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redeployment was critical in addressing the increased demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system. Previous research indicates that ethnic minority healthcare workers (HCWs), those on visas, and in junior roles, were more likely to be redeployed to COVID-19 duties compared to White UK-born HCWs. There is limited evidence on how redeployment was practically organized, preparedness of HCWs and the NHS for rapid changes, and the decision-making processes involved. This paper discusses HCWs' redeployment experiences, their alignment with NHS policy for deploying staff safely, and potential links to staff attrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes among Healthcare workers, we conducted a qualitative sub-study, between December 2020 and July 2021, consisting of interviews and focus groups with 164 HCWs from different ethnicities, genders, job roles, migration statuses, and UK regions. Sessions were conducted online or by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed with participants' consent. We utilised the breadth-and-depth approach, initially identifying transcripts mentioning redeployment or changes in work patterns, followed by an in-depth thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 164 HCWs, 22 (13.4%) reported redeployment to a new role, while 42 (26.8%) reported changes in their working patterns. Redeployment experiences varied based on HCWs' workplaces, skillsets, input into decisions, and perceived risks. Four themes were identified: 1. redeployment and the changing nature of work, 2. pandemic (un)preparedness, 3. redeployment decision-making, and 4. risk assessments in the context of redeployment. Our data revealed the practical realities of redeployment, including discrepancies between the NHS policy and actual practices, particularly early deployment without adequate training and supervision. The lack of planning and preparedness had an operational and emotional impact on HCWs, affecting their morale. Lastly, some HCWs felt disempowered and undervalued due to a lack of agency in redeployment decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights HCWs' redeployment experiences during COVID-19, the conditions under which it occurred, and its impacts. The findings, although rooted in the pandemic, remain relevant for addressing staffing challenges in the healthcare workforce. We recommend future redeployment strategies prioritise HCWs' training and supervision, ensure strategic planning with clear communication and support for all staff, foster a sense of value among HCWs, and integrate an intersectional equity lens into workforce planning to improve staff retention and morale.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12389-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Redeployment was critical in addressing the increased demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system. Previous research indicates that ethnic minority healthcare workers (HCWs), those on visas, and in junior roles, were more likely to be redeployed to COVID-19 duties compared to White UK-born HCWs. There is limited evidence on how redeployment was practically organized, preparedness of HCWs and the NHS for rapid changes, and the decision-making processes involved. This paper discusses HCWs' redeployment experiences, their alignment with NHS policy for deploying staff safely, and potential links to staff attrition.

Methods: As part of the United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes among Healthcare workers, we conducted a qualitative sub-study, between December 2020 and July 2021, consisting of interviews and focus groups with 164 HCWs from different ethnicities, genders, job roles, migration statuses, and UK regions. Sessions were conducted online or by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed with participants' consent. We utilised the breadth-and-depth approach, initially identifying transcripts mentioning redeployment or changes in work patterns, followed by an in-depth thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 164 HCWs, 22 (13.4%) reported redeployment to a new role, while 42 (26.8%) reported changes in their working patterns. Redeployment experiences varied based on HCWs' workplaces, skillsets, input into decisions, and perceived risks. Four themes were identified: 1. redeployment and the changing nature of work, 2. pandemic (un)preparedness, 3. redeployment decision-making, and 4. risk assessments in the context of redeployment. Our data revealed the practical realities of redeployment, including discrepancies between the NHS policy and actual practices, particularly early deployment without adequate training and supervision. The lack of planning and preparedness had an operational and emotional impact on HCWs, affecting their morale. Lastly, some HCWs felt disempowered and undervalued due to a lack of agency in redeployment decisions.

Conclusion: This study highlights HCWs' redeployment experiences during COVID-19, the conditions under which it occurred, and its impacts. The findings, although rooted in the pandemic, remain relevant for addressing staffing challenges in the healthcare workforce. We recommend future redeployment strategies prioritise HCWs' training and supervision, ensure strategic planning with clear communication and support for all staff, foster a sense of value among HCWs, and integrate an intersectional equity lens into workforce planning to improve staff retention and morale.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国COVID-19期间医护人员的重新部署和工作模式的变化:一项定性研究
背景:重新部署对于解决COVID-19对医疗系统日益增加的需求至关重要。之前的研究表明,与英国出生的白人医护人员相比,持签证和担任初级职务的少数族裔医护人员(HCWs)更有可能被重新部署到COVID-19职责中。关于如何实际组织重新部署、卫生保健工作者和国民保健制度如何为快速变化做好准备以及所涉及的决策过程的证据有限。本文讨论了HCWs的重新部署经验,他们与NHS安全部署员工的政策的一致性,以及与员工流失的潜在联系。方法:作为英国医疗保健工作者种族与COVID-19结局研究的一部分,我们在2020年12月至2021年7月期间进行了一项定性子研究,包括对164名来自不同种族、性别、工作角色、移民身份和英国地区的医疗保健工作者的访谈和焦点小组。会议通过在线或电话进行,在参与者同意的情况下进行录音、转录和分析。我们采用了广度和深度的方法,首先确定提及重新部署或工作模式变化的抄本,然后进行深入的专题分析。结果:在164名医护人员中,22名(13.4%)报告被调任新角色,42名(26.8%)报告工作模式发生变化。根据医护人员的工作场所、技能、对决策的投入和对风险的感知,重新部署的经验各不相同。确定了四个主题:1。2.重新部署和工作性质的变化。3.大流行病(联合国)防范;3 .重新部署决策;重新部署背景下的风险评估。我们的数据揭示了重新部署的实际现实,包括NHS政策与实际做法之间的差异,特别是没有充分培训和监督的早期部署。缺乏计划和准备对卫生保健员的行动和情绪产生了影响,影响了他们的士气。最后,由于在重新部署决策中缺乏代理权,一些医护人员感到权力被剥夺和被低估。结论:本研究突出了COVID-19期间医护人员的重新部署经验,发生的条件及其影响。调查结果虽然源于大流行,但对于解决卫生保健工作人员的人员配置挑战仍然具有相关性。我们建议未来的人事调动策略应优先考虑医护人员的培训和监督,确保战略规划在所有员工明确沟通和支持的情况下进行,培养医护人员的价值意识,并在员工规划中纳入交叉公平的视角,以提高员工的保留率和士气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Design and implementation of a web-based patient registration system in a single-centered tertiary care hospital of coastal Karnataka. Perceptions of healthcare workers on the electronic health record system of sexually transmitted disease clinics in Sri Lanka: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Assessing the association between the domains of the Atlas Context Assessment and implementation outcomes of the TeamBirth project: a cross-sectional study. The current landscape of Ohio otolaryngologists and associated conditions: a state-level analysis. Exploring people-centred healthcare in arthritis care: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1