Comparison of overall survival of adult and pediatric osteosarcoma patients using the national cancer database.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3
Ryan Boyland, Saber Amin, Valerie Shostrom, Cheng Zheng, Jenna Allison, Chi Lin
{"title":"Comparison of overall survival of adult and pediatric osteosarcoma patients using the national cancer database.","authors":"Ryan Boyland, Saber Amin, Valerie Shostrom, Cheng Zheng, Jenna Allison, Chi Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in overall survival (OS) between pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma are poorly understood. The objective of this study is to compare the OS of pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma, identify prognostic factors associated with OS, and explore factors specifically associated with pediatric osteosarcoma using data gathered from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients > = 1 years old and diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2017 were included in the study. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for gender, race, income, education, place of living, health insurance status, year of diagnosis, stage of cancer, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT) was used to assess the association of age with the OS of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 8,458 patients among whom 3,027 (35.8%) were between 1 and 17 years old. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, adult patients had worse OS compared with pediatric patients (HR: 1.84; p < .01). When stratified by treatment type, pediatric patients had better OS in several groups. This includes those who received chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.58, p < .01), surgery alone (HR: 0.48, p < .01), surgery plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.56, p < .01), and those who received no treatment (HR: 0.31, p < .01). There was no significant difference in OS between pediatric and adult patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and RT (HR: 0.81, p = .42). In analysis stratified by cancer stage, pediatric patients had better OS compared to adult patients at each stage. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pediatric patients are more likely to be non-white, have insurance, present with unknown/occult stage disease, have poorly differentiated tumors, and receive chemotherapy, or surgery. Additionally, multivariable Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with improved OS: age, diagnosis between 2011 and 2015, private insurance, non-metastatic disease, well-differentiated tumors, and receiving chemotherapy or surgery, but not RT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma had better OS compared to their adult counterparts. Pediatric patients had better OS compared to adults when the analysis was stratified by treatment modality and stage of cancer. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying reason for this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in overall survival (OS) between pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma are poorly understood. The objective of this study is to compare the OS of pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma, identify prognostic factors associated with OS, and explore factors specifically associated with pediatric osteosarcoma using data gathered from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods: Patients > = 1 years old and diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2017 were included in the study. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for gender, race, income, education, place of living, health insurance status, year of diagnosis, stage of cancer, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT) was used to assess the association of age with the OS of the patients.

Results: The analysis included 8,458 patients among whom 3,027 (35.8%) were between 1 and 17 years old. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, adult patients had worse OS compared with pediatric patients (HR: 1.84; p < .01). When stratified by treatment type, pediatric patients had better OS in several groups. This includes those who received chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.58, p < .01), surgery alone (HR: 0.48, p < .01), surgery plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.56, p < .01), and those who received no treatment (HR: 0.31, p < .01). There was no significant difference in OS between pediatric and adult patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and RT (HR: 0.81, p = .42). In analysis stratified by cancer stage, pediatric patients had better OS compared to adult patients at each stage. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pediatric patients are more likely to be non-white, have insurance, present with unknown/occult stage disease, have poorly differentiated tumors, and receive chemotherapy, or surgery. Additionally, multivariable Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with improved OS: age, diagnosis between 2011 and 2015, private insurance, non-metastatic disease, well-differentiated tumors, and receiving chemotherapy or surgery, but not RT.

Conclusion: Pediatric patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma had better OS compared to their adult counterparts. Pediatric patients had better OS compared to adults when the analysis was stratified by treatment modality and stage of cancer. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying reason for this difference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics combining ensemble learning for prognosis prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study. A preoperative pathological staging prediction model for esophageal cancer based on CT radiomics. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of bone sarcomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Global trends and risk factors of laryngeal cancer: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study (1990-2021). Nationwide implementation of the international multidisciplinary best-practice for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-4): study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1