Comparison of overall survival of adult and pediatric osteosarcoma patients using the national cancer database.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3
Ryan Boyland, Saber Amin, Valerie Shostrom, Cheng Zheng, Jenna Allison, Chi Lin
{"title":"Comparison of overall survival of adult and pediatric osteosarcoma patients using the national cancer database.","authors":"Ryan Boyland, Saber Amin, Valerie Shostrom, Cheng Zheng, Jenna Allison, Chi Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in overall survival (OS) between pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma are poorly understood. The objective of this study is to compare the OS of pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma, identify prognostic factors associated with OS, and explore factors specifically associated with pediatric osteosarcoma using data gathered from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients > = 1 years old and diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2017 were included in the study. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for gender, race, income, education, place of living, health insurance status, year of diagnosis, stage of cancer, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT) was used to assess the association of age with the OS of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 8,458 patients among whom 3,027 (35.8%) were between 1 and 17 years old. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, adult patients had worse OS compared with pediatric patients (HR: 1.84; p < .01). When stratified by treatment type, pediatric patients had better OS in several groups. This includes those who received chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.58, p < .01), surgery alone (HR: 0.48, p < .01), surgery plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.56, p < .01), and those who received no treatment (HR: 0.31, p < .01). There was no significant difference in OS between pediatric and adult patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and RT (HR: 0.81, p = .42). In analysis stratified by cancer stage, pediatric patients had better OS compared to adult patients at each stage. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pediatric patients are more likely to be non-white, have insurance, present with unknown/occult stage disease, have poorly differentiated tumors, and receive chemotherapy, or surgery. Additionally, multivariable Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with improved OS: age, diagnosis between 2011 and 2015, private insurance, non-metastatic disease, well-differentiated tumors, and receiving chemotherapy or surgery, but not RT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma had better OS compared to their adult counterparts. Pediatric patients had better OS compared to adults when the analysis was stratified by treatment modality and stage of cancer. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying reason for this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13496-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in overall survival (OS) between pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma are poorly understood. The objective of this study is to compare the OS of pediatric and adult patients with osteosarcoma, identify prognostic factors associated with OS, and explore factors specifically associated with pediatric osteosarcoma using data gathered from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods: Patients > = 1 years old and diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2017 were included in the study. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for gender, race, income, education, place of living, health insurance status, year of diagnosis, stage of cancer, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT) was used to assess the association of age with the OS of the patients.

Results: The analysis included 8,458 patients among whom 3,027 (35.8%) were between 1 and 17 years old. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, adult patients had worse OS compared with pediatric patients (HR: 1.84; p < .01). When stratified by treatment type, pediatric patients had better OS in several groups. This includes those who received chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.58, p < .01), surgery alone (HR: 0.48, p < .01), surgery plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.56, p < .01), and those who received no treatment (HR: 0.31, p < .01). There was no significant difference in OS between pediatric and adult patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and RT (HR: 0.81, p = .42). In analysis stratified by cancer stage, pediatric patients had better OS compared to adult patients at each stage. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pediatric patients are more likely to be non-white, have insurance, present with unknown/occult stage disease, have poorly differentiated tumors, and receive chemotherapy, or surgery. Additionally, multivariable Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with improved OS: age, diagnosis between 2011 and 2015, private insurance, non-metastatic disease, well-differentiated tumors, and receiving chemotherapy or surgery, but not RT.

Conclusion: Pediatric patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma had better OS compared to their adult counterparts. Pediatric patients had better OS compared to adults when the analysis was stratified by treatment modality and stage of cancer. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying reason for this difference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用国家癌症数据库比较成人和儿童骨肉瘤患者的总生存期。
背景:诊断为骨肉瘤的儿童和成人患者的总生存期(OS)差异尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较儿童和成人骨肉瘤患者的OS,确定与OS相关的预后因素,并利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)收集的数据探索与儿童骨肉瘤特异性相关的因素。方法:选取2004 - 2017年间年龄为bb0 = 1岁、诊断为骨肉瘤的患者。采用多变量Cox回归分析,校正性别、种族、收入、教育程度、居住地、健康保险状况、诊断年份、癌症分期、手术、化疗和放疗(RT)等因素,评估年龄与患者OS的关系。结果:共纳入8458例患者,其中3027例(35.8%)年龄在1 ~ 17岁。在多变量Cox回归分析中,成人患者的OS较儿童患者差(HR: 1.84;结论:与成人相比,诊断为骨肉瘤的儿童患者有更好的OS。当按治疗方式和癌症分期进行分层分析时,儿科患者的OS优于成人。需要进一步的研究来阐明造成这种差异的根本原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in cancer patients. Clinical patterns, treatment outcomes and determinant factors in children with neuroblastoma in a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia. High TLG measured by PET/CT is associated with worse PFS in patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer treated by abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy. Sequential thoracic radiotherapy following immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study on efficacy and safety. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of metastatic gastric cancer in South Korea: real-world evidence from retrospective electronic medical records data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1