Biometry and keratometry measurements after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus patients: a pilot comparison between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12886-025-03914-2
Shahram Bamdad, Amirmohammad Fathian, Mohammad Reza Khalili, Mohammad Mohammadi, Alireza Attar
{"title":"Biometry and keratometry measurements after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus patients: a pilot comparison between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700.","authors":"Shahram Bamdad, Amirmohammad Fathian, Mohammad Reza Khalili, Mohammad Mohammadi, Alireza Attar","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-03914-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This pilot study aimed to compare ocular biometric data obtained from Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 in patients with keratoconus who underwent intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this pilot study, patients who underwent ICRS implantation (between 2013 and 2021) at Khalili Hospital were assessed using pre-surgical examinations and biometry and keratometry measurements performed with the Pentacam AXL and the IOLMaster 700. The devices were used in random order, and measurements were conducted by expert operators who were blinded to each other's results. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 21 patients (mean age: 35.47 ± 6.43 years) who underwent ICRS implantation surgery were included. Significant mean differences between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 were observed in anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry (KM), steep keratometry (K2), and white-to-white distance (WTW) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for axial length (AL), flat keratometry (K1), K1 and K2 meridians, or intraocular lens (IOL) power calculated using Haigis and SRK/T formulas (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in ACD, KM, K2, and WTW were observed between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 in patients with ICRS implantation, while AL, K1, K1 meridian, K2 meridian, and IOL power calculations (Haigis and SRK/T) showed no differences. These findings underscore the importance of device selection tailored to specific clinical and biometric needs and suggest the necessity of larger studies to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03914-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This pilot study aimed to compare ocular biometric data obtained from Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 in patients with keratoconus who underwent intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation.

Method: In this pilot study, patients who underwent ICRS implantation (between 2013 and 2021) at Khalili Hospital were assessed using pre-surgical examinations and biometry and keratometry measurements performed with the Pentacam AXL and the IOLMaster 700. The devices were used in random order, and measurements were conducted by expert operators who were blinded to each other's results. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.

Result: A total of 21 patients (mean age: 35.47 ± 6.43 years) who underwent ICRS implantation surgery were included. Significant mean differences between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 were observed in anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry (KM), steep keratometry (K2), and white-to-white distance (WTW) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for axial length (AL), flat keratometry (K1), K1 and K2 meridians, or intraocular lens (IOL) power calculated using Haigis and SRK/T formulas (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Significant differences in ACD, KM, K2, and WTW were observed between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700 in patients with ICRS implantation, while AL, K1, K1 meridian, K2 meridian, and IOL power calculations (Haigis and SRK/T) showed no differences. These findings underscore the importance of device selection tailored to specific clinical and biometric needs and suggest the necessity of larger studies to confirm these results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆锥角膜患者角膜内环段植入术后的生物测量和角膜测量:Pentacam AXL与IOL Master 700的初步比较
目的:本初步研究旨在比较Pentacam AXL和IOL Master 700在角膜环段(ICRS)植入术中获得的圆锥角膜患者眼部生物特征数据。方法:在这项初步研究中,在Khalili医院接受ICRS植入术的患者(2013年至2021年)通过术前检查、Pentacam AXL和IOLMaster 700进行生物测量和角膜测量进行评估。这些设备的使用顺序是随机的,测量由专家操作人员进行,他们对彼此的结果一无所知。数据分析采用SPSS version 23。结果:共纳入21例ICRS植入术患者,平均年龄35.47±6.43岁。Pentacam AXL与IOL Master 700在前房深度(ACD)、平均角膜度数(KM)、陡峭角膜度数(K2)和白距(WTW)方面的平均差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:在ICRS植入术患者中,Pentacam AXL与IOL Master 700的ACD、KM、K2、WTW差异有统计学意义,而AL、K1、K1经络、K2经络、IOL度数计算(Haigis和SRK/T)无统计学意义。这些发现强调了针对特定临床和生物识别需求量身定制设备的重要性,并建议进行更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Serum and urinary mindin as a potential biomarker for diabetic retinopathy: a prospective cross-sectional study. Efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy for symptomatic vitreous floaters associated with Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis. Evaluation of static and dynamic pupil responses in patients with acromegaly with automatic pupillometer. Short-term outcomes of aflibercept biosimilar SB15 in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Reasons for dissatisfaction after implantation of extended depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses: a retrospective case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1