Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07313-9
Sanaz Safarzadeh, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Nasibeh Roozbeh, Fatemeh Darsareh
{"title":"Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.","authors":"Sanaz Safarzadeh, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Nasibeh Roozbeh, Fatemeh Darsareh","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07313-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the known benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC), limited data exists on its implementation, especially its influencing factors. The current study was designed to use machine learning (ML) to identify the predictors of SSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study implemented predictive SSC approaches based on the data obtained from the \"Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)\" from January 2020 to January 2022. A predictive model was built using nine statistical learning models (linear regression, logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Demographic, obstetric, and maternal and neonatal clinical factors were considered as potential predicting factors and were extracted from the patient's medical records. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F_1 Score were measured to evaluate the diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8031 eligible mothers, 3759 (46.8%) experienced SSC. The algorithms created by deep learning (AUROC: 0.81, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.67, recall: 0.77, and F_1 Score: 0.73) and linear regression (AUROC: 0.80, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.66, recall: 0.75, and F_1 Score: 0.71) had the highest performance in predicting SSC. Doula support, neonatal weight, gestational age, attending childbirth classes, and maternal age were the critical predictors for SSC based on the top two algorithms with superior performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this study found that the ML model performed well in predicting SSC, more research is needed to make a better conclusion about its performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07313-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the known benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC), limited data exists on its implementation, especially its influencing factors. The current study was designed to use machine learning (ML) to identify the predictors of SSC.

Methods: This study implemented predictive SSC approaches based on the data obtained from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)" from January 2020 to January 2022. A predictive model was built using nine statistical learning models (linear regression, logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Demographic, obstetric, and maternal and neonatal clinical factors were considered as potential predicting factors and were extracted from the patient's medical records. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F_1 Score were measured to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

Results: Of 8031 eligible mothers, 3759 (46.8%) experienced SSC. The algorithms created by deep learning (AUROC: 0.81, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.67, recall: 0.77, and F_1 Score: 0.73) and linear regression (AUROC: 0.80, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.66, recall: 0.75, and F_1 Score: 0.71) had the highest performance in predicting SSC. Doula support, neonatal weight, gestational age, attending childbirth classes, and maternal age were the critical predictors for SSC based on the top two algorithms with superior performance.

Conclusions: Although this study found that the ML model performed well in predicting SSC, more research is needed to make a better conclusion about its performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习方法预测母亲和新生儿的皮肤接触。
背景:尽管已知皮肤与皮肤接触(SSC)的益处,但关于其实施的数据有限,特别是其影响因素。目前的研究旨在使用机器学习(ML)来识别SSC的预测因子。方法:本研究基于2020年1月至2022年1月从“伊朗孕产妇和新生儿网络(IMaN Net)”获得的数据实施了预测性SSC方法。采用线性回归、逻辑回归、决策树分类、随机森林分类、深度学习前馈、极端梯度增强模型、轻梯度增强模型、支持向量机、k近邻置换特征分类等9个统计学习模型构建预测模型。人口统计学、产科、孕产妇和新生儿临床因素被认为是潜在的预测因素,并从患者的医疗记录中提取。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、准确度、精密度、召回率和F_1评分评价诊断效果。结果:在8031名符合条件的母亲中,3759名(46.8%)经历了SSC。深度学习算法(AUROC: 0.81,准确率:0.75,精密度:0.67,召回率:0.77,F_1评分:0.73)和线性回归算法(AUROC: 0.80,准确率:0.75,精密度:0.66,召回率:0.75,F_1评分:0.71)对SSC的预测效果最好。导乐支持、新生儿体重、胎龄、参加分娩班和母亲年龄是SSC的关键预测因素,基于前两种算法,表现优异。结论:虽然本研究发现ML模型在预测SSC方面表现良好,但需要更多的研究来对其性能做出更好的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Community Midwifery Care (CMC) on maternal and neonatal wellbeing in postnatal period: a qualitative study. Factors that influence the adoption of heat-health protective actions during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study conducted in San Antonio, Texas, United States, in 2024. Vaginal birth after two cesarean sections (VBAC-2) under a standardized protocol: success rates, safety, and cesarean after spontaneous labor as an alternative. Association between timing of antenatal corticosteroid and developmental outcomes in children born late preterm by high-risk pregnancies. A couple-based physical activity intervention for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1