{"title":"INtravaScular OptIcal Frequency Domain ImaGing EvaluaTion of the Femoropopliteal Lesion With JETSTREAM Atherectomy (INSIGHT JETSTREAM)","authors":"Koji Kuroda, Amane Kozuki, Kenzo Uzu, Takafumi Todoroki, Masamichi Iwasaki, Junichi Imanishi, Souichiro Yamashita, Wataru Fujimoto, Makoto Takemoto, Mayuka Masuda, Masanori Okuda","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There have been no prior reports of detailed evaluations using intravascular imaging during Jetstream treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the effects of calcification characteristics and wire bias on lumen gain in Jetstream atherectomy using optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent OFDI-guided Jetstream atherectomy with 1.85 mm, 2.4 mm blade down (BD), and 2.4 mm blade up (BU). Cross-sections were categorized into three groups based on OFDI findings before Jetstream atherectomy: fibrous plaques (FPs), calcified protrusions (CPs), and eruptive calcified nodules (ECNs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-seven patients (36 limbs) were enrolled, and 1502 cross-sections were serially analyzed. There were 186 FPs, 753 CPs, and 563 ECNs. The acquired lumen gain after all atherectomy steps was significantly larger in the ECNs group than in the CPs and FPs groups. ECNs had the strongest effect on the variability in the lumen gain. In the effect of wire bias on the degree of debulking, a significant correlation was observed between wire distance and lumen gain in 1.85- and 2.4-mm BD atherectomy procedures. However, in the 2.4-mm BU procedure, no significant correlation was recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Jetstream atherectomy for ECNs can result in greater lumen gain. In the 1.85- and 2.4-mm BD atherectomy procedures, wire bias may be involved in lumen gain, whereas in the 2.4-mm BU procedure, lumen gain is obtained regardless of wire bias. In Jetstream atherectomy procedures, a detailed assessment using OFDI may contribute to predicting the degree of debulking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>UMIN ID<b>:</b> UMIN000054588. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000061997.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 6","pages":"1287-1295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31460","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There have been no prior reports of detailed evaluations using intravascular imaging during Jetstream treatment.
Aims
This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the effects of calcification characteristics and wire bias on lumen gain in Jetstream atherectomy using optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI).
Methods
This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent OFDI-guided Jetstream atherectomy with 1.85 mm, 2.4 mm blade down (BD), and 2.4 mm blade up (BU). Cross-sections were categorized into three groups based on OFDI findings before Jetstream atherectomy: fibrous plaques (FPs), calcified protrusions (CPs), and eruptive calcified nodules (ECNs).
Results
Twenty-seven patients (36 limbs) were enrolled, and 1502 cross-sections were serially analyzed. There were 186 FPs, 753 CPs, and 563 ECNs. The acquired lumen gain after all atherectomy steps was significantly larger in the ECNs group than in the CPs and FPs groups. ECNs had the strongest effect on the variability in the lumen gain. In the effect of wire bias on the degree of debulking, a significant correlation was observed between wire distance and lumen gain in 1.85- and 2.4-mm BD atherectomy procedures. However, in the 2.4-mm BU procedure, no significant correlation was recorded.
Conclusions
Jetstream atherectomy for ECNs can result in greater lumen gain. In the 1.85- and 2.4-mm BD atherectomy procedures, wire bias may be involved in lumen gain, whereas in the 2.4-mm BU procedure, lumen gain is obtained regardless of wire bias. In Jetstream atherectomy procedures, a detailed assessment using OFDI may contribute to predicting the degree of debulking.
背景:在Jetstream治疗期间,还没有使用血管内成像进行详细评估的报道。目的:因此,本研究旨在利用光学频域成像(OFDI)研究Jetstream动脉粥样硬化切除术中钙化特征和金属丝偏置对管腔增益的影响。方法:本研究招募了连续接受ofdi引导下的Jetstream动脉粥样硬化切除术的患者,患者的刀片向下(BD)为1.85 mm, 2.4 mm,向上(BU)为2.4 mm。根据Jetstream动脉粥样硬化切除术前OFDI的检查结果,横断面分为三组:纤维斑块(FPs)、钙化突起(CPs)和爆发性钙化结节(ecn)。结果:纳入27例患者(36条肢体),对1502个横截面进行了连续分析。其中FPs 186例,CPs 753例,ecn 563例。在所有动脉粥样硬化切除术步骤后,ECNs组获得的管腔增益明显大于CPs和FPs组。ecn对管腔增益变异性的影响最大。在金属丝偏置对减积程度的影响中,在1.85 mm和2.4 mm BD动脉粥样硬化切除术中,金属丝距离和管腔增益之间存在显著相关性。然而,在2.4 mm BU手术中,没有记录到显著的相关性。结论:射流动脉粥样硬化切除术可导致更大的管腔增益。在1.85 mm和2.4 mm BD动脉粥样硬化切除术中,金属丝偏置可能涉及到管腔增益,而在2.4 mm BU手术中,无论金属丝偏置如何,都可以获得管腔增益。在Jetstream动脉粥样硬化切除术中,使用OFDI进行详细评估可能有助于预测减积程度。试验注册:UMIN ID: UMIN000054588。https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000061997。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.