Real-World Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy and Novel Therapies for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2024.11.014
Loretta J. Nastoupil , Clark R. Andersen , Amy Ayers , Yucai Wang , Thomas M. Habermann , Dai Chihara , Brad S. Kahl , Brian K. Link , Jean L. Koff , Jonathon B. Cohen , Peter Martin , Izidore S. Lossos , Michele Stanchina , Sara Haddadi , Carla Casulo , Sabarish Ayyappan , Ruitao Lin , Ziyi Li , Melissa A. Larson , Matthew J. Maurer , Christopher R. Flowers
{"title":"Real-World Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy and Novel Therapies for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma","authors":"Loretta J. Nastoupil ,&nbsp;Clark R. Andersen ,&nbsp;Amy Ayers ,&nbsp;Yucai Wang ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Habermann ,&nbsp;Dai Chihara ,&nbsp;Brad S. Kahl ,&nbsp;Brian K. Link ,&nbsp;Jean L. Koff ,&nbsp;Jonathon B. Cohen ,&nbsp;Peter Martin ,&nbsp;Izidore S. Lossos ,&nbsp;Michele Stanchina ,&nbsp;Sara Haddadi ,&nbsp;Carla Casulo ,&nbsp;Sabarish Ayyappan ,&nbsp;Ruitao Lin ,&nbsp;Ziyi Li ,&nbsp;Melissa A. Larson ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Maurer ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Flowers","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clinical trials provide meaningful data regarding the safety and efficacy of novel therapies but there is often a lag between the time of new drug approval and information on posttreatment clinical outcomes in real-world practice. This study evaluated clinical outcomes in a large real-world population of patients with relapsed and/or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies in second or later lines of therapy (2L+).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Data from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (1/1/2015–2/15/2023) were analyzed. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were described and response rates, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 2L+ cohort included patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (N = 593), lenalidomide-based therapy (n = 60), polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy (N = 116), tafasitamab-based therapy (N = 55), and loncastuximab tesirine (N = 42). Most patients who received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) were refractory to the treatment. Across all patients, overall response rates were &lt;50%, with one-quarter achieving complete response and median duration of response and overall survival were short (&lt;6 and &lt;10 months, respectively) among patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies. The prognosis was worse for patients who had previously received CAR-T. Primary refractory status, high-risk disease, and failing 3 or more lines of therapy were significantly associated with worse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with r/r LBCL have unfavorable outcomes and need more effective treatment alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages e183-e199.e8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2152265024024376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical trials provide meaningful data regarding the safety and efficacy of novel therapies but there is often a lag between the time of new drug approval and information on posttreatment clinical outcomes in real-world practice. This study evaluated clinical outcomes in a large real-world population of patients with relapsed and/or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies in second or later lines of therapy (2L+).

Materials and Methods

Data from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (1/1/2015–2/15/2023) were analyzed. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were described and response rates, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Results

The 2L+ cohort included patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (N = 593), lenalidomide-based therapy (n = 60), polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy (N = 116), tafasitamab-based therapy (N = 55), and loncastuximab tesirine (N = 42). Most patients who received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) were refractory to the treatment. Across all patients, overall response rates were <50%, with one-quarter achieving complete response and median duration of response and overall survival were short (<6 and <10 months, respectively) among patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies. The prognosis was worse for patients who had previously received CAR-T. Primary refractory status, high-risk disease, and failing 3 or more lines of therapy were significantly associated with worse outcomes.

Conclusion

Patients with r/r LBCL have unfavorable outcomes and need more effective treatment alternatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗免疫疗法和新疗法对复发/难治性侵袭性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者的实际疗效。
临床试验提供了关于新疗法的安全性和有效性的有意义的数据,但在现实世界的实践中,新药批准的时间与治疗后临床结果的信息之间往往存在滞后。本研究评估了现实世界中大量复发和/或难治性大b细胞淋巴瘤(r/r LBCL)患者接受化学免疫疗法或二线或二线以上治疗(2L+)的新疗法的临床结果。材料与方法:对来自真实世界证据(CReWE)队列(2015年1月1日- 2023年2月15日)的淋巴瘤结局流行病学(LEO)研究数据进行分析。描述了患者的人口统计学和临床特征,并评估了反应率、反应持续时间、无进展生存期和总生存期。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型评估患者临床特征与预后之间的关系。结果:2L+队列包括化疗免疫治疗(N = 593),来那度胺治疗(N = 60),波拉妥单抗韦多汀治疗(N = 116),他法西他单抗治疗(N = 55)和隆卡妥昔单抗特西林(N = 42)的患者。大多数接受过嵌合抗原受体t细胞治疗(CAR-T)的患者对治疗难治性。结论:r/r LBCL患者预后不良,需要更有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Optimizing Selection of Bridging Therapies Prior to CAR-T Therapy Administration for Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Pearls From an Expert Roundtable Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Compared to Daratumumab, Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Multicenter Real-World Experience Changes in Frailty Categorization Over One Year among Real-World Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Cohort Study (MFRAIL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1