Indirect Spinal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Efficacy of Combined Modified Percutaneous Posterior Short-segment Fixation and Intraoperative CT Assistance.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001772
Hou-Tsung Chen, Re-Wen Wu, Fu-Shine Yang, Cheh-Yung Chang, Chieh-Cheng Hsu, Sung-Hsiung Chen, Meng-Ling Lu
{"title":"Indirect Spinal Decompression in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Efficacy of Combined Modified Percutaneous Posterior Short-segment Fixation and Intraoperative CT Assistance.","authors":"Hou-Tsung Chen, Re-Wen Wu, Fu-Shine Yang, Cheh-Yung Chang, Chieh-Cheng Hsu, Sung-Hsiung Chen, Meng-Ling Lu","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the combined modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation technique by reducing and fixating the thoracolumbar burst fracture and checking the efficacy of indirect spinal decompression using intraoperative CT. This study aims to (1) demonstrate that using modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation is enough to rebuild spinal stability and decompress the spinal stenosis for thoracolumbar burst fracture and (2) prove the effects of spinal canal decompression by intraoperative portable CT with the surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Various posterior instrumentation methods have been used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures and decompress retropulsed bony fragments through ligamentotaxis, but no studies have assessed the efficacy of combining percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation with intraoperative CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation to rebuild the spinal stability and ligamentotaxis effect to indirect decompression of the spinal stenosis without laminectomy and check parameters immediately after surgery by real-time intraoperative portable CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures underwent modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation from 2018 to 2023 at a single medical center. Mean injured vertebral canal dimension increased from 90.8±26.3 to 122.1±30.3 mm2 (P<0.05) and mean canal encroachment index decreased from 44.8±9.5% to 25.6±4.8% (P<0.05), the anterior body height increased from 13.9±3.8 to 25.9±3.9 mm (P<0.01) and kyphotic angle decreased from 27.3±3.2 to 8.6±2.1 degrees (P<0.01). Neurological function was improved by at least 1 Frankel grade in neurological deficit patients. No significant difference in kyphotic angle between post-op and 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indirect decompression of the spinal canal with modified percutaneous short-segment fixation without laminectomy was an effective treatment for thoracolumbar burst fracture, even in selected incomplete neurological deficits patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate the combined modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation technique by reducing and fixating the thoracolumbar burst fracture and checking the efficacy of indirect spinal decompression using intraoperative CT. This study aims to (1) demonstrate that using modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation is enough to rebuild spinal stability and decompress the spinal stenosis for thoracolumbar burst fracture and (2) prove the effects of spinal canal decompression by intraoperative portable CT with the surgical technique.

Summary of background data: Various posterior instrumentation methods have been used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures and decompress retropulsed bony fragments through ligamentotaxis, but no studies have assessed the efficacy of combining percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation with intraoperative CT.

Methods: Using modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation to rebuild the spinal stability and ligamentotaxis effect to indirect decompression of the spinal stenosis without laminectomy and check parameters immediately after surgery by real-time intraoperative portable CT.

Results: Fifty-seven patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures underwent modified percutaneous short-segment posterior instrumentation from 2018 to 2023 at a single medical center. Mean injured vertebral canal dimension increased from 90.8±26.3 to 122.1±30.3 mm2 (P<0.05) and mean canal encroachment index decreased from 44.8±9.5% to 25.6±4.8% (P<0.05), the anterior body height increased from 13.9±3.8 to 25.9±3.9 mm (P<0.01) and kyphotic angle decreased from 27.3±3.2 to 8.6±2.1 degrees (P<0.01). Neurological function was improved by at least 1 Frankel grade in neurological deficit patients. No significant difference in kyphotic angle between post-op and 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Indirect decompression of the spinal canal with modified percutaneous short-segment fixation without laminectomy was an effective treatment for thoracolumbar burst fracture, even in selected incomplete neurological deficits patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Single-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability, a 2-year Follow-up Study. Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Hip Displacement Following Spinal Fusion in Nonambulant Patients With Spastic Neuromuscular Scoliosis. A Correlation Among the Most Classic Axis Injuries Classification and the New AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System. Fusion Outcomes of GLP-1 Agonist Therapy in Multilevel Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1