Procalcitonin Chemiluminescent Immunoassay - Bias Estimation on Multiplatform.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical laboratory Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240630
Yun Li, Fengyue Lu, Qide Liang, Pingfeng Feng, Xin Li, Chaohui Duan, Ping Guan, Huayi Huang
{"title":"Procalcitonin Chemiluminescent Immunoassay - Bias Estimation on Multiplatform.","authors":"Yun Li, Fengyue Lu, Qide Liang, Pingfeng Feng, Xin Li, Chaohui Duan, Ping Guan, Huayi Huang","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procalcitonin (PCT) is a useful biomarker for infection and especially useful for sepsis management. Multiple platforms, including the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), have been used for serum PCT analysis. However, the results from different analytical platforms should be evaluated to determine if they can be mutually substituted in the same laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The serum PCT were analyzed on the Mindray CL-6000i chemiluminescent immunoassay (candidate method), the Roche Elecsys, and the VIDAS PCT chemiluminescence immunoassay platforms (comparative measurements), and the results were evaluated and compared, following the CLSI EP09-A3 guidelines, by using patient samples with different PCT concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median of difference was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.038 - 0.045) between the candidate method and the comparative measurements for the concentration interval of < 0.5 ng/mL. The median of percentage difference was 6.6% (95% CI: 5.5% - 8.7%) for the concentration interval of 0.5 - 2.0 ng/mL, the median of difference was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06 - 0.17) for the concentration interval of 2.0 - 10.0 ng/mL, and the median of percentage difference was -4.7% (95% CI: -6.1% - 2.4%) for the concentration interval of 10.0 - 100.0 ng/mL. The acceptable bias was ± 0.055 (± 10.4%) at 0.53 ng/mL (low value), and the acceptable bias was ± 0.83 (± 9.0%) at 9.34 ng/mL (high value). The bias between the candidate method and comparative measurements was acceptable for the full concentration ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bias between the PCT results from Mindray, Roche, and VIDAS was acceptable. Therefore, the results of the three analytical platforms were comparable, and they may be mixed-used in the same institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a useful biomarker for infection and especially useful for sepsis management. Multiple platforms, including the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), have been used for serum PCT analysis. However, the results from different analytical platforms should be evaluated to determine if they can be mutually substituted in the same laboratory.

Methods: The serum PCT were analyzed on the Mindray CL-6000i chemiluminescent immunoassay (candidate method), the Roche Elecsys, and the VIDAS PCT chemiluminescence immunoassay platforms (comparative measurements), and the results were evaluated and compared, following the CLSI EP09-A3 guidelines, by using patient samples with different PCT concentrations.

Results: The median of difference was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.038 - 0.045) between the candidate method and the comparative measurements for the concentration interval of < 0.5 ng/mL. The median of percentage difference was 6.6% (95% CI: 5.5% - 8.7%) for the concentration interval of 0.5 - 2.0 ng/mL, the median of difference was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06 - 0.17) for the concentration interval of 2.0 - 10.0 ng/mL, and the median of percentage difference was -4.7% (95% CI: -6.1% - 2.4%) for the concentration interval of 10.0 - 100.0 ng/mL. The acceptable bias was ± 0.055 (± 10.4%) at 0.53 ng/mL (low value), and the acceptable bias was ± 0.83 (± 9.0%) at 9.34 ng/mL (high value). The bias between the candidate method and comparative measurements was acceptable for the full concentration ranges.

Conclusions: The bias between the PCT results from Mindray, Roche, and VIDAS was acceptable. Therefore, the results of the three analytical platforms were comparable, and they may be mixed-used in the same institution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降钙素原化学发光免疫测定-多平台偏差估计。
背景:降钙素原(PCT)是一种有用的感染生物标志物,对脓毒症的治疗尤其有用。包括化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)在内的多种平台已被用于血清PCT分析。然而,来自不同分析平台的结果应进行评估,以确定它们是否可以在同一实验室中相互替代。方法:采用迈瑞CL-6000i化学发光免疫分析法(候选方法)、罗氏Elecsys和VIDAS化学发光免疫分析法(比较测量)对血清PCT进行分析,并按照CLSI EP09-A3指南,对不同PCT浓度的患者样本进行评价和比较。结果:在< 0.5 ng/mL的浓度区间内,候选方法与比较方法的中位差为0.04 (95% CI: 0.038 ~ 0.045)。在0.5 ~ 2.0 ng/mL浓度区间,百分比差异中位数为6.6% (95% CI: 5.5% ~ 8.7%),在2.0 ~ 10.0 ng/mL浓度区间,百分比差异中位数为0.11 (95% CI: 0.06 ~ 0.17),在10.0 ~ 100.0 ng/mL浓度区间,百分比差异中位数为-4.7% (95% CI: -6.1% ~ 2.4%)。在0.53 ng/mL(低值)时可接受偏倚为±0.055(±10.4%),在9.34 ng/mL(高值)时可接受偏倚为±0.83(±9.0%)。候选方法和比较测量之间的偏差在整个浓度范围内是可接受的。结论:迈瑞、罗氏和VIDAS的PCT结果之间的偏差是可以接受的。因此,三种分析平台的结果具有可比性,它们可能在同一机构中混合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Published Articles on Acute Pancreatitis and Acute Lung Injury from 2004 to 2024. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma: a Retrospective Analysis. Coffee Colored Plasma: Which Interference Should be Considered? Deep Vein Thrombosis in Pelvic Tumor Patients: Correlating Serum Coagulation Factors with Clinical Risk Profiles. Comparison of the Autof MS1000 with the Vitek MS in the Identification of Bacterial and Yeast Isolates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1