Carbon dioxide detection for diagnosis of inadvertent respiratory tract placement of enterogastric tubes in children.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011196.pub2
Fiona Smith, Agi McFarland, Marie Elen
{"title":"Carbon dioxide detection for diagnosis of inadvertent respiratory tract placement of enterogastric tubes in children.","authors":"Fiona Smith, Agi McFarland, Marie Elen","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD011196.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The insertion of an enterogastric tube (oral or nasal) (EGT) is the passage of a tube through the nose or mouth into the stomach. In a paediatric setting, EGTs are used within clinical practice for a variety of reasons including enteral feeding, decompression, post-gastrointestinal surgery, patient assessment, and drug and fluid administration. Confirmation of EGT placement is required immediately following insertion and thereafter prior to each use, including after the administration of enteral feed or medication. Although the majority of these tubes are inserted and used without incident, there is an established risk that the tube can be misplaced into the lungs or move out of the stomach. This misplacement can result in significant harm or mortality. As such, diagnostic tests are required to assess the placement of EGTs and to rule out the target condition of potential airway placement. Various methods are used to determine EGT position, including bedside assessment and observing for signs of respiratory distress. Air insufflated (blown) through the EGT in combination with epigastric auscultation (listening to the stomach with a stethoscope) for whooshing sounds has also been used. Although these tests are widely recognised, they are not officially recommended for use as standalone measures of EGT placement. Current American and UK guidelines recommend a combination of aspirate testing and radiological confirmation of EGT placement in infant, child, and adult populations. In adults, objective measures of pH of the aspirate may be used, with a pH reading between 1 and 5.5 considered a reliable method for excluding placement in the pulmonary tree. However, testing for acidity of aspirate obtained from the EGT does not accurately differentiate between bronchial and gastric secretions in paediatric practice. Additionally, there may be difficulty in obtaining aspirate from the EGT especially within a paediatric population due to the size of the EGT and the smaller volumes of gastric secretions produced. Radiography or direct visualisation are the only reliable methods of confirming EGT placement (valid at time of X-ray and point of insertion, respectively) in this population and are thus considered the reference standard. However, within the paediatric population, there is a known difficulty with obtaining radiographs that visualise the entire course of the EGT and a recognised risk in radiation exposure in the paediatric setting. The measurement of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in exhaled air is a recognised and mandatory standard of care for confirming and monitoring endotracheal tube or airway placement under general anaesthesia. The measurement of CO₂ can be achieved in one of two ways: capnography or colorimetric capnometry. Capnography is the measurement of inspired and expired CO₂ using the absorption of infrared light by CO₂ molecules to estimate CO₂ concentrations. These measurements are then displayed against time to give a continual graphical trace. Colorimetric capnometry involves the detection of CO₂ using an adapted form of pH filter paper impregnated with a dye that changes colour from purple to yellow in the presence of CO₂; however, this method does not provide a continual reading. The monitoring of CO₂ emanating from an EGT inadvertently passed into the airways would utilise this phenomenon in a reverse manner, confirming tracheobronchial placement rather than the intended stomach.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of capnometry and capnography for detecting respiratory EGT placement in children compared to the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Medion database on 4 September 2023. There were no limits on language or publication status.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of CO₂ detection (assessed by either capnometry or capnography) for EGT placement in the respiratory tract with the reference standard, and those that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CO₂ detection for differentiating between respiratory and gastrointestinal tube placement, in children. We included both prospective and retrospective cross-sectional studies. We included diagnostic case-control studies where patients acted as their own controls whereby the same EGT and end placement was tested both via index and reference test concurrently.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using QUADAS-2. There were no disagreements. Where data were available, we reported test accuracy as sensitivity and specificity. Calculation of both sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was only possible for one study. We calculated specificity with a 95% CI for all included studies. Due to the low number of included studies, we were not able to perform meta-analysis or conduct our planned investigations of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified three studies for inclusion in the review, all of which provided data on test accuracy of capnography or capnometry against the radiological test standard. Across the three studies, there were a total of 121 participants and 139 EGT insertions with low event data for false-positive (n = 6 insertions) and true-positive (n = 3 insertions) scenarios. No event data were available for false-negative scenarios. Overall, the body of evidence has a low risk of bias, although further clarity regarding patient enrolment (whether consecutive or random) and details about the conduct of the index and reference tests would have enhanced the overall quality of the evidence base included in the review.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>There is currently not enough evidence to suggest that CO₂ detection for inadvertent respiratory tract placement of EGTs in children should be added to current checking procedures. Future studies should aim for larger samples across a range of ages and evaluate different types of CO₂ monitoring (capnography and capnometry), using a range of EGT sizes in participants who are both spontaneously breathing or who require mechanical ventilation with or without impairments of conscious level.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD011196"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011196.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The insertion of an enterogastric tube (oral or nasal) (EGT) is the passage of a tube through the nose or mouth into the stomach. In a paediatric setting, EGTs are used within clinical practice for a variety of reasons including enteral feeding, decompression, post-gastrointestinal surgery, patient assessment, and drug and fluid administration. Confirmation of EGT placement is required immediately following insertion and thereafter prior to each use, including after the administration of enteral feed or medication. Although the majority of these tubes are inserted and used without incident, there is an established risk that the tube can be misplaced into the lungs or move out of the stomach. This misplacement can result in significant harm or mortality. As such, diagnostic tests are required to assess the placement of EGTs and to rule out the target condition of potential airway placement. Various methods are used to determine EGT position, including bedside assessment and observing for signs of respiratory distress. Air insufflated (blown) through the EGT in combination with epigastric auscultation (listening to the stomach with a stethoscope) for whooshing sounds has also been used. Although these tests are widely recognised, they are not officially recommended for use as standalone measures of EGT placement. Current American and UK guidelines recommend a combination of aspirate testing and radiological confirmation of EGT placement in infant, child, and adult populations. In adults, objective measures of pH of the aspirate may be used, with a pH reading between 1 and 5.5 considered a reliable method for excluding placement in the pulmonary tree. However, testing for acidity of aspirate obtained from the EGT does not accurately differentiate between bronchial and gastric secretions in paediatric practice. Additionally, there may be difficulty in obtaining aspirate from the EGT especially within a paediatric population due to the size of the EGT and the smaller volumes of gastric secretions produced. Radiography or direct visualisation are the only reliable methods of confirming EGT placement (valid at time of X-ray and point of insertion, respectively) in this population and are thus considered the reference standard. However, within the paediatric population, there is a known difficulty with obtaining radiographs that visualise the entire course of the EGT and a recognised risk in radiation exposure in the paediatric setting. The measurement of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in exhaled air is a recognised and mandatory standard of care for confirming and monitoring endotracheal tube or airway placement under general anaesthesia. The measurement of CO₂ can be achieved in one of two ways: capnography or colorimetric capnometry. Capnography is the measurement of inspired and expired CO₂ using the absorption of infrared light by CO₂ molecules to estimate CO₂ concentrations. These measurements are then displayed against time to give a continual graphical trace. Colorimetric capnometry involves the detection of CO₂ using an adapted form of pH filter paper impregnated with a dye that changes colour from purple to yellow in the presence of CO₂; however, this method does not provide a continual reading. The monitoring of CO₂ emanating from an EGT inadvertently passed into the airways would utilise this phenomenon in a reverse manner, confirming tracheobronchial placement rather than the intended stomach.

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of capnometry and capnography for detecting respiratory EGT placement in children compared to the reference standard.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Medion database on 4 September 2023. There were no limits on language or publication status.

Selection criteria: We included studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of CO₂ detection (assessed by either capnometry or capnography) for EGT placement in the respiratory tract with the reference standard, and those that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CO₂ detection for differentiating between respiratory and gastrointestinal tube placement, in children. We included both prospective and retrospective cross-sectional studies. We included diagnostic case-control studies where patients acted as their own controls whereby the same EGT and end placement was tested both via index and reference test concurrently.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using QUADAS-2. There were no disagreements. Where data were available, we reported test accuracy as sensitivity and specificity. Calculation of both sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was only possible for one study. We calculated specificity with a 95% CI for all included studies. Due to the low number of included studies, we were not able to perform meta-analysis or conduct our planned investigations of heterogeneity.

Main results: We identified three studies for inclusion in the review, all of which provided data on test accuracy of capnography or capnometry against the radiological test standard. Across the three studies, there were a total of 121 participants and 139 EGT insertions with low event data for false-positive (n = 6 insertions) and true-positive (n = 3 insertions) scenarios. No event data were available for false-negative scenarios. Overall, the body of evidence has a low risk of bias, although further clarity regarding patient enrolment (whether consecutive or random) and details about the conduct of the index and reference tests would have enhanced the overall quality of the evidence base included in the review.

Authors' conclusions: There is currently not enough evidence to suggest that CO₂ detection for inadvertent respiratory tract placement of EGTs in children should be added to current checking procedures. Future studies should aim for larger samples across a range of ages and evaluate different types of CO₂ monitoring (capnography and capnometry), using a range of EGT sizes in participants who are both spontaneously breathing or who require mechanical ventilation with or without impairments of conscious level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳检测诊断儿童呼吸道误置肠胃管。
背景:肠胃管(口或鼻)插入(EGT)是将一根管通过鼻或口进入胃。在儿科环境中,egt在临床实践中用于各种原因,包括肠内喂养、减压、胃肠道术后手术、患者评估以及药物和液体给药。EGT的放置需要在插入后立即确认,此后每次使用之前,包括在肠内喂养或药物管理之后。虽然大多数导管的插入和使用都没有发生事故,但存在导管错位进入肺部或从胃中移出的风险。这种错位可能导致严重的伤害或死亡。因此,需要诊断测试来评估egt的放置,并排除潜在气道放置的目标条件。各种方法用于确定EGT位置,包括床边评估和观察呼吸窘迫的迹象。通过EGT吹气并结合上胃听诊(用听诊器听胃)来听呼呼声也被使用过。虽然这些测试被广泛认可,但它们并没有被正式推荐作为EGT放置的独立措施。目前,美国和英国的指南建议在婴儿、儿童和成人人群中,结合吸入试验和放射学证实EGT的放置。对于成人,可以使用客观的吸出液pH值测量,pH值读数在1到5.5之间被认为是排除放置在肺树的可靠方法。然而,在儿科实践中,从EGT中获得的吸出液酸度测试并不能准确区分支气管分泌物和胃分泌物。此外,由于EGT的大小和产生的胃分泌物体积较小,可能难以从EGT中获得抽吸液,特别是在儿科人群中。在该人群中,x线摄影或直接显像是确认EGT放置的唯一可靠方法(分别在x线和插入点有效),因此被认为是参考标准。然而,在儿科人群中,已知很难获得可视化EGT整个过程的x光片,并且在儿科环境中辐射暴露的公认风险。测量呼出空气中的二氧化碳(CO₂)是在全身麻醉下确认和监测气管内管或气道放置的公认和强制性护理标准。二氧化碳的测量可以通过两种方法之一来实现:二氧化碳测定法或比色二氧化碳测定法。二氧化碳测量是利用CO₂分子对红外光的吸收来测量CO₂的浓度。然后根据时间显示这些测量值,以给出连续的图形跟踪。比色测热法是用一种浸渍了一种染料的pH滤纸来检测CO₂,这种染料在CO₂存在的情况下会从紫色变成黄色;但是,这种方法不提供连续读数。监测无意中进入气道的EGT释放的二氧化碳将以相反的方式利用这一现象,确认气管支气管而不是预期的胃的位置。目的:比较血液计量学和血液造影检测儿童呼吸道EGT放置的诊断准确性。检索方法:我们于2023年9月4日检索了Cochrane诊断测试准确性研究注册库、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和Medion数据库。对语言或出版地位没有限制。选择标准:我们纳入了与参考标准比较呼吸道EGT放置的CO₂检测诊断准确性(通过二氧化碳计量学或二氧化碳造影评估)的研究,以及评估儿童呼吸道和胃肠道导管放置的CO₂检测诊断准确性的研究。我们纳入了前瞻性和回顾性横断面研究。我们纳入了诊断性病例对照研究,其中患者作为自己的对照,通过索引和参考测试同时测试相同的EGT和末端放置。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者独立提取数据并使用QUADAS-2评估方法学质量。没有分歧。在有数据的情况下,我们报告了检测的准确性,即敏感性和特异性。仅在一项研究中可以计算出95%可信区间(CI)的敏感性和特异性。我们以95% CI计算了所有纳入研究的特异性。 由于纳入的研究数量较少,我们无法进行meta分析或进行我们计划的异质性调查。主要结果:我们确定了三项研究纳入本综述,所有研究均提供了相对于放射学测试标准的血液流变学或血液计量学测试准确性的数据。在这三项研究中,共有121名参与者和139个EGT插入,假阳性(n = 6个插入)和真阳性(n = 3个插入)情况下的低事件数据。没有假阴性情景的事件数据。总体而言,证据体的偏倚风险较低,尽管进一步明确患者入组(无论是连续的还是随机的)以及关于索引和参考试验进行的详细信息将提高综述中纳入的证据基础的整体质量。作者的结论是:目前没有足够的证据表明,在目前的检查程序中应该增加对儿童呼吸道无意放置egt的CO₂检测。未来的研究应针对年龄范围内的更大样本,并评估不同类型的二氧化碳监测(二氧化碳测量和二氧化碳测量),在自发呼吸或需要机械通气的参与者中使用一系列EGT大小,有无意识水平障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic versus open repair for paediatric inguinal hernia. Interventions to reduce hospital readmissions in people with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for preventing colorectal cancer and colorectal adenoma in the general population. Machine-learning algorithms for detecting intracranial hemorrhage on head computed tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1