Effect of Cholecystectomy on Bubble Formation and Endoscopic Visualization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-08911-5
Jeffrey Loeffler, Gaetano Di Pietro, Hamed Chehab, Mira AlSheikh, Harika Kandlakunta, Hassan Al Moussawi, Danial Daneshvar, Yosef Buchen, Dineshreddy Gurala, Shivantha Amarnath, Mohammad Abureesh, Ahmed Elfiky, Vivek Gumaste, Sherif Andrawes
{"title":"Effect of Cholecystectomy on Bubble Formation and Endoscopic Visualization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jeffrey Loeffler, Gaetano Di Pietro, Hamed Chehab, Mira AlSheikh, Harika Kandlakunta, Hassan Al Moussawi, Danial Daneshvar, Yosef Buchen, Dineshreddy Gurala, Shivantha Amarnath, Mohammad Abureesh, Ahmed Elfiky, Vivek Gumaste, Sherif Andrawes","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08911-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between cholecystectomy and colonic bubble formation during colonoscopy, METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Staten Island University Hospital. Researchers reviewed 348 colonoscopy reports, comparing patients with (n = 56) and without (n = 292) a history of cholecystectomy. Colonic bubble formation was assessed using a 0-3 scale (0 = no bubbles, 3 = severe bubbles). Secondary endpoints included polyp and adenoma detection, withdrawal and procedure times, bowel preparation quality, and repeat procedures. Statistical analysis included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with prior cholecystectomy had significantly higher incidence of severe bubble formation (score 3; 28.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.001), longer withdrawal times (18 ± 8 vs. 15 ± 5 min, p = 0.024), and increased need for repeat colonoscopies (10.7% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in adenoma detection, polyp detection, or bowel preparation quality between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy is associated with increased colonic bubble formation during colonoscopy, leading to longer withdrawal times and higher rates of repeat procedures. While this study did not find a difference in adenoma detection rates, the impaired visualization caused by bubbles may necessitate tailored bowel preparation strategies for patients with a history of cholecystectomy to optimize colonoscopy effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1555-1559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08911-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the association between cholecystectomy and colonic bubble formation during colonoscopy, METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Staten Island University Hospital. Researchers reviewed 348 colonoscopy reports, comparing patients with (n = 56) and without (n = 292) a history of cholecystectomy. Colonic bubble formation was assessed using a 0-3 scale (0 = no bubbles, 3 = severe bubbles). Secondary endpoints included polyp and adenoma detection, withdrawal and procedure times, bowel preparation quality, and repeat procedures. Statistical analysis included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ2 tests.

Results: Patients with prior cholecystectomy had significantly higher incidence of severe bubble formation (score 3; 28.6% vs. 12%, p = 0.001), longer withdrawal times (18 ± 8 vs. 15 ± 5 min, p = 0.024), and increased need for repeat colonoscopies (10.7% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in adenoma detection, polyp detection, or bowel preparation quality between the two groups.

Conclusion: Cholecystectomy is associated with increased colonic bubble formation during colonoscopy, leading to longer withdrawal times and higher rates of repeat procedures. While this study did not find a difference in adenoma detection rates, the impaired visualization caused by bubbles may necessitate tailored bowel preparation strategies for patients with a history of cholecystectomy to optimize colonoscopy effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆囊切除术对胆囊泡形成及内镜显示的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估结肠镜检查中胆囊切除术与结肠泡形成的关系。方法:在史坦顿岛大学医院进行单中心回顾性队列研究。研究人员回顾了348份结肠镜检查报告,比较了有(n = 56)和没有(n = 292)胆囊切除术史的患者。采用0-3分制评估结肠气泡形成情况(0 =无气泡,3 =严重气泡)。次要终点包括息肉和腺瘤的检测、撤离和手术时间、肠道准备质量和重复手术。统计分析包括t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和χ2检验。结果:既往胆囊切除术患者严重胆囊泡形成的发生率显著增高(评分3分;28.6%对12%,p = 0.001),停药时间延长(18±8对15±5分钟,p = 0.024),重复结肠镜检查需求增加(10.7%对2.1%,p = 0.001)。两组在腺瘤检测、息肉检测或肠道准备质量方面均无显著差异。结论:胆囊切除术与结肠镜检查时结肠泡形成增加有关,导致更长的停药时间和更高的重复手术率。虽然本研究没有发现腺瘤检出率的差异,但气泡引起的可视化受损可能需要为有胆囊切除术史的患者量身定制肠道准备策略,以优化结肠镜检查的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Adjunctive Stenting After Esophageal ESD: Dissecting the Data Delivers Doubt. Candida Enteritis Diagnoses in the United States: Prevalence and Clinical Insights from a Large Commercial Insurance Database. Gastroenterologist's Guide to Assess for Alcohol Use. Size Matters: Defining a Reference Standard for Colorectal Polyp Sizing. Unravelling the Links Between Gastroesophageal Reflux and Lung Disease: New Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1