A randomised controlled trial comparing three clinical administration strategies in spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography with low contrast medium dose.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11420-8
Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Owen Thomas, Anton Bengt Nyquist, Audun Sanderud, Joao Boavida, Jonn Terje Geitung, Thien Trung Tran, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen
{"title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing three clinical administration strategies in spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography with low contrast medium dose.","authors":"Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Owen Thomas, Anton Bengt Nyquist, Audun Sanderud, Joao Boavida, Jonn Terje Geitung, Thien Trung Tran, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11420-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare vascular attenuation (VA) with three strategies for administering a low contrast medium (CM) dose in dual-layer spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively randomised into control- or one of two experimental groups. Control group patients received CM (350 mgI/mL) diluted 1:1 with saline. Experimental group B received CM (350 mgI/mL) with low flow. Experimental group C received CM with low concentration (140 mgI/mL). Virtual monoenergetic images at 40 and 55 kiloelectron Volt (keV) were reconstructed. Objective examination quality (OEQ) i.e., VA, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio, was measured and subjective examination quality (SEQ) was rated at three anatomical levels: in the pulmonary trunk (PT), the interlobar arteries and the posterior basal segmental arteries.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>VA in PT at 40 keV.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>OEQ and SEQ across all anatomic levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 328 patients were randomised. 112 vs 115 and 101 were analysed in the control (A) vs experimental groups (B and C), respectively. There were no differences in VA in PT between the groups: A vs B (p = 0.96), B vs C (p = 0.14), and A vs C (p = 0.18). Group C showed higher VA across all anatomical levels. There were no differences in SEQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference in the attenuation in the PT between the dilution-, low flow-, and low concentration groups. However, the low concentration group showed higher attenuation in the pulmonary arteries when all anatomical levels were assessed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Contrast medium reduction may be accomplished with dilution, low flow, or low concentration. However, the effect of the different strategies on vascular attenuation is unknown. Findings There was no difference in pulmonary trunk attenuation between the three strategies on spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography. Clinical relevance Low contrast medium dose spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography may be implemented with the administration strategy of the unit's own choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4649-4660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11420-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare vascular attenuation (VA) with three strategies for administering a low contrast medium (CM) dose in dual-layer spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

Methods: Patients were prospectively randomised into control- or one of two experimental groups. Control group patients received CM (350 mgI/mL) diluted 1:1 with saline. Experimental group B received CM (350 mgI/mL) with low flow. Experimental group C received CM with low concentration (140 mgI/mL). Virtual monoenergetic images at 40 and 55 kiloelectron Volt (keV) were reconstructed. Objective examination quality (OEQ) i.e., VA, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio, was measured and subjective examination quality (SEQ) was rated at three anatomical levels: in the pulmonary trunk (PT), the interlobar arteries and the posterior basal segmental arteries.

Primary outcome: VA in PT at 40 keV.

Secondary outcomes: OEQ and SEQ across all anatomic levels.

Results: A total of 328 patients were randomised. 112 vs 115 and 101 were analysed in the control (A) vs experimental groups (B and C), respectively. There were no differences in VA in PT between the groups: A vs B (p = 0.96), B vs C (p = 0.14), and A vs C (p = 0.18). Group C showed higher VA across all anatomical levels. There were no differences in SEQ.

Conclusion: There was no difference in the attenuation in the PT between the dilution-, low flow-, and low concentration groups. However, the low concentration group showed higher attenuation in the pulmonary arteries when all anatomical levels were assessed.

Key points: Question Contrast medium reduction may be accomplished with dilution, low flow, or low concentration. However, the effect of the different strategies on vascular attenuation is unknown. Findings There was no difference in pulmonary trunk attenuation between the three strategies on spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography. Clinical relevance Low contrast medium dose spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography may be implemented with the administration strategy of the unit's own choice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照试验,比较了低造影剂剂量光谱探测器 CT 肺血管造影术中的三种临床用药策略。
目的:比较血管衰减(VA)与三种低对比剂(CM)剂量在双层光谱检测器CT肺血管造影(CTPA)中的应用策略。方法:患者前瞻性随机分为对照组或两个实验组之一。对照组患者给予生理盐水1:1稀释的CM (350 mgI/mL)。实验B组给予低流量CM (350 mgI/mL)。实验C组给予低浓度CM (140 mgI/mL)。重建了40和55千电子伏(keV)的虚拟单能图像。测量客观检查质量(OEQ),即VA、噪声和信噪比,并在三个解剖水平上评定主观检查质量(SEQ):肺动脉干(PT)、叶间动脉和后基底节段动脉。主要结局:40 keV时PT的VA。次要结果:所有解剖水平的OEQ和SEQ。结果:共328例患者被随机分组。分别在对照组(A)和实验组(B和C)中分析112、115和101。A组与B组(p = 0.96)、B组与C组(p = 0.14)、A组与C组(p = 0.18)的VA无显著差异。C组在所有解剖水平均显示较高的VA。两组间SEQ无差异。结论:稀释组、低流量组和低浓度组PT衰减无明显差异。然而,低浓度组在所有解剖水平上都显示出更高的肺动脉衰减。对比剂的还原可以通过稀释、低流量或低浓度来完成。然而,不同策略对血管衰减的影响尚不清楚。结果三种方法在肺血管造影上的肺干衰减无明显差异。低对比中剂量谱检测器CT肺血管造影可采用单位自主选择的给药策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the severity of ischemic colitis: validation of a CT scan severity score in 174 consecutive patients. The application of Doppler ultrasound in evaluating angioplasty outcomes and predicting recurrence in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Initial experience of deep learning reconstruction algorithm in lung kernel: clinical usefulness for lung nodules at ultra-low-dose protocol. FLAIR vascular hyperintensity: association with infarction and vascular lesion burden in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis. ESR Essentials: neuroimaging of pediatric headaches in the emergent and non-emergent setting-practice recommendations by the European Society of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1