Improving image quality and diagnostic usability in photon-counting coronary CT angiography using a novel reconstruction algorithm.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11429-z
Nina P Haag, Julius H Niehoff, Iram Shahzadi, Christoph Panknin, Marcus Wiemer, Sven Kaese, Roman Johannes Gertz, Lenhard Pennig, Ole Inuk Platte, Alexey Surov, Jan Borggrefe, Jan Robert Kroeger
{"title":"Improving image quality and diagnostic usability in photon-counting coronary CT angiography using a novel reconstruction algorithm.","authors":"Nina P Haag, Julius H Niehoff, Iram Shahzadi, Christoph Panknin, Marcus Wiemer, Sven Kaese, Roman Johannes Gertz, Lenhard Pennig, Ole Inuk Platte, Alexey Surov, Jan Borggrefe, Jan Robert Kroeger","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11429-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Qualitative comparison of image quality and diagnostic usability of the recently introduced ZeeFree (ZF) reconstruction algorithm for photon-counting coronary CT angiography (cCTA) with Standard (SD) and TrueStack (TS) reconstruction algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 59 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 13.7, 37 males) who were referred for cCTA on a clinical photon-counting CT scanner between July and December 2023. Curved planar reformations were reconstructed for coronary arteries using ZF, SD, and TS algorithms. Three blinded radiologists individually evaluated image quality on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent; median and interquartile range). Differences were evaluated using Friedman's test with pair-wise post-hoc testing. Readers were advised to assess the image quality to be diagnostic using a dichotomous yes/no question, with results being presented as percentages and significance evaluated by the Pearson Chi-Square test. Interrater reliability for image quality used Gwet's AC2 coefficient with ordinal weights, and Gwet's AC1 coefficient for diagnostic usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ZF showed superior quality (4 (2)) compared to SD (4 (2), p = 0.03) and TS (4 (1), p < 0.001) while a substantial inter-rater agreement was observed for all algorithms (0.70-0.74). Furthermore, ZF obtained the highest diagnostic usability compared to SD (82.5% vs. 77.0%, p < 0.001) and TS (75.5%, p < 0.001) while yielding an almost perfect inter-rater agreement (0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to SD and TS, the novel ZF image reconstruction algorithm for photon-counting cCTA provides improved image quality and diagnostic usability, suggesting its primary use for clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How well does the novel ZeeFree algorithm address motion artifacts in photon-counting coronary CT angiography? Findings ZeeFree significantly outperformed Standard and TrueStack reconstruction algorithms for image quality and diagnostic usability. Clinical relevance Enhanced image quality with ZeeFree could improve the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4798-4804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11429-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Qualitative comparison of image quality and diagnostic usability of the recently introduced ZeeFree (ZF) reconstruction algorithm for photon-counting coronary CT angiography (cCTA) with Standard (SD) and TrueStack (TS) reconstruction algorithms.

Methods and materials: This retrospective single-center study included 59 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 13.7, 37 males) who were referred for cCTA on a clinical photon-counting CT scanner between July and December 2023. Curved planar reformations were reconstructed for coronary arteries using ZF, SD, and TS algorithms. Three blinded radiologists individually evaluated image quality on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent; median and interquartile range). Differences were evaluated using Friedman's test with pair-wise post-hoc testing. Readers were advised to assess the image quality to be diagnostic using a dichotomous yes/no question, with results being presented as percentages and significance evaluated by the Pearson Chi-Square test. Interrater reliability for image quality used Gwet's AC2 coefficient with ordinal weights, and Gwet's AC1 coefficient for diagnostic usability.

Results: ZF showed superior quality (4 (2)) compared to SD (4 (2), p = 0.03) and TS (4 (1), p < 0.001) while a substantial inter-rater agreement was observed for all algorithms (0.70-0.74). Furthermore, ZF obtained the highest diagnostic usability compared to SD (82.5% vs. 77.0%, p < 0.001) and TS (75.5%, p < 0.001) while yielding an almost perfect inter-rater agreement (0.84).

Conclusion: Compared to SD and TS, the novel ZF image reconstruction algorithm for photon-counting cCTA provides improved image quality and diagnostic usability, suggesting its primary use for clinical assessment.

Key points: Question How well does the novel ZeeFree algorithm address motion artifacts in photon-counting coronary CT angiography? Findings ZeeFree significantly outperformed Standard and TrueStack reconstruction algorithms for image quality and diagnostic usability. Clinical relevance Enhanced image quality with ZeeFree could improve the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新型重建算法提高光子计数冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的图像质量和诊断可用性。
目的:对最近推出的用于光子计数冠状动脉CT血管造影(cCTA)的ZeeFree (ZF)重建算法与Standard (SD)和TrueStack (TS)重建算法的图像质量和诊断可用性进行定性比较。方法和材料:本回顾性单中心研究纳入了2023年7月至12月在临床光子计数CT扫描仪上行cCTA的59例患者(平均年龄62.5±13.7岁,男性37例)。采用ZF、SD和TS算法重建冠状动脉曲面重构。三名盲法放射科医生分别以李克特5分制评估图像质量(5 =优秀;中位数和四分位数范围)。采用弗里德曼检验和成对事后检验来评估差异。建议读者使用“是/否”的二分问题来评估图像质量是否具有诊断性,结果以百分比形式呈现,并通过皮尔逊卡方检验评估显著性。图像质量的判据信度采用排序权重的Gwet的AC2系数,诊断可用性采用Gwet的AC1系数。结果:与SD (4 (2), p = 0.03)和TS(4(1)相比,ZF图像重建算法(4(2))的图像质量优于SD(4(2))和TS (4 (1), p结论:与SD和TS相比,用于光子计数cCTA的新型ZF图像重建算法提高了图像质量和诊断可用性,建议将其用于临床评估。新的ZeeFree算法在光子计数冠状动脉CT血管造影中处理运动伪影的效果如何?ZeeFree在图像质量和诊断可用性方面明显优于Standard和TrueStack重建算法。应用ZeeFree增强图像质量可提高冠状动脉疾病的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
ESR Innovation in Focus: photon-counting detector CT. ESR Innovation in Focus: Robotics applications for interventional radiology. ESR Essentials: imaging in nasal obstruction and epistaxis-practice recommendations by the European Society of Head and Neck Radiology. Feasibility of BMI-based sub-milliSievert low-dose CT in individualized detection of lung nodules. ESR Innovation in Focus: High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1