Poor radiological outcomes and associated factors among tibial shaft fracture patients treated with intramedullary nail fixation at Addis Ababa Burn, Emergency and Trauma Hospital, Ethiopia.
Yohannes Shugie, Samuel Kebede, Fanna Adugna, Dereje Bayissa Demissie, Tilahun Desta
{"title":"Poor radiological outcomes and associated factors among tibial shaft fracture patients treated with intramedullary nail fixation at Addis Ababa Burn, Emergency and Trauma Hospital, Ethiopia.","authors":"Yohannes Shugie, Samuel Kebede, Fanna Adugna, Dereje Bayissa Demissie, Tilahun Desta","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1473038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial shaft fractures account for the majority of operatively treated long bone fractures and have the greatest prevalence of open wounds. For both open and closed injuries, intramedullary fixation has become the standard of therapy. At Addis Ababa Burn, Emergency, and Trauma (AaBET) Hospital, the rates of poor radiological outcomes for tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary fixation are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective health facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nails at AaBET Hospital. Data were collected by reviewing medical records and x-rays. The study was conducted on a sample size of 160 using a simple random sampling technique. Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were used to summarize the results. Binary logistic regression was used to describe the associations between variables. A <i>P</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 122 (76.3%) men and 38 (23.8%) women with a mean age of 36.3 ± 13.9. The magnitude of poor radiological outcomes among the tibial shaft fracture patients treated with intramedullary nail fixation was 23.1%, with factors including include the presence of medical comorbidity [adjusted odd ratio (AOR) (95% confidence interval, CI): 16.5 (2.524-108.69)], having diabetes mellitus [AOR (95% CI): 3.85 (1.07-14.08)], Gustilo-Anderson type III (GA III) open fractures [AOR (95% CI): 17.4 (3.11-97.72)], and post-operative infection [AOR (95% CI): 13.9 (5.8-33.16)] identified as being significantly associated with poor radiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The magnitude of poor radiological outcomes in this study is comparable to other similar studies. The study found that factors including Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, diabetes mellitus, and post-operative infections increase the odds of poor radiological outcomes in patients with tibial shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing. Therefore, surgeons should improve their assessment and evaluation of patients with infection signs and use negative wound pressure for GA III fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1473038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1473038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tibial shaft fractures account for the majority of operatively treated long bone fractures and have the greatest prevalence of open wounds. For both open and closed injuries, intramedullary fixation has become the standard of therapy. At Addis Ababa Burn, Emergency, and Trauma (AaBET) Hospital, the rates of poor radiological outcomes for tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary fixation are unknown.
Methods: A retrospective health facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nails at AaBET Hospital. Data were collected by reviewing medical records and x-rays. The study was conducted on a sample size of 160 using a simple random sampling technique. Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were used to summarize the results. Binary logistic regression was used to describe the associations between variables. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: This study included 122 (76.3%) men and 38 (23.8%) women with a mean age of 36.3 ± 13.9. The magnitude of poor radiological outcomes among the tibial shaft fracture patients treated with intramedullary nail fixation was 23.1%, with factors including include the presence of medical comorbidity [adjusted odd ratio (AOR) (95% confidence interval, CI): 16.5 (2.524-108.69)], having diabetes mellitus [AOR (95% CI): 3.85 (1.07-14.08)], Gustilo-Anderson type III (GA III) open fractures [AOR (95% CI): 17.4 (3.11-97.72)], and post-operative infection [AOR (95% CI): 13.9 (5.8-33.16)] identified as being significantly associated with poor radiological outcomes.
Conclusion: The magnitude of poor radiological outcomes in this study is comparable to other similar studies. The study found that factors including Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, diabetes mellitus, and post-operative infections increase the odds of poor radiological outcomes in patients with tibial shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing. Therefore, surgeons should improve their assessment and evaluation of patients with infection signs and use negative wound pressure for GA III fractures.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.