Peak frequency drop: a novel intraprocedural parameter predicting acute conduction gaps post-pulmonary vein isolation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s10840-025-02019-6
Yoshiaki Mizutani, Yuma Matsumoto, Keisuke Nishio, Hiroya Sakai, Gen Fujiwara, Daishi Nonokawa, Yuichiro Makino, Hitomi Suzuki, Hitoshi Ichimiya, Yasuhiro Uchida, Junji Watanabe, Masaaki Kanashiro, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Yasuya Inden, Toyoaki Murohara
{"title":"Peak frequency drop: a novel intraprocedural parameter predicting acute conduction gaps post-pulmonary vein isolation.","authors":"Yoshiaki Mizutani, Yuma Matsumoto, Keisuke Nishio, Hiroya Sakai, Gen Fujiwara, Daishi Nonokawa, Yuichiro Makino, Hitomi Suzuki, Hitoshi Ichimiya, Yasuhiro Uchida, Junji Watanabe, Masaaki Kanashiro, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Yasuya Inden, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02019-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The identification of potential gap sites after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and prevention of these warning points during ablation are crucial. We evaluated the changes in peak frequency (PF) on electrograms and examined the relationship between its value and the residual pulmonary vein (PV) gap after PVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with a PV gap after PVI with a power setting of 50 W using a novel irrigated-tip catheter (TactiFlex, Abbott). The PF on bipolar electrograms in the ablation catheter was recorded immediately before and after ablation at all available ablation points, using Omnipolar technology near field. We compared the pre- and post-PF values, changes in PF, contact force, and impedance drop between points with and without a PV gap following PVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 695 ablation points in 13 patients were analyzed. There were 19 and 676 points with and without the PV gap, respectively. The PV gap group demonstrated significantly lower PF drop and contact force (-14 ± 43 Hz vs. 61 ± 57 Hz, p < 0.001; and 8 [7-10] g vs. 10 [4-14] g, p = 0.039), and higher post-PF (226 ± 49 Hz vs. 176 ± 47 Hz, p < 0.001) than in the non-PV gap group. The PF drop had the highest area under the curve of 0.878 (95% confidence interval: 0.791-0.964) on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting the PV gap, with a cutoff value of 10.5 Hz (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 89.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PF drop during PVI is a useful parameter for predicting the non-PV gap with a high probability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02019-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The identification of potential gap sites after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and prevention of these warning points during ablation are crucial. We evaluated the changes in peak frequency (PF) on electrograms and examined the relationship between its value and the residual pulmonary vein (PV) gap after PVI.

Methods: We included patients with a PV gap after PVI with a power setting of 50 W using a novel irrigated-tip catheter (TactiFlex, Abbott). The PF on bipolar electrograms in the ablation catheter was recorded immediately before and after ablation at all available ablation points, using Omnipolar technology near field. We compared the pre- and post-PF values, changes in PF, contact force, and impedance drop between points with and without a PV gap following PVI.

Results: A total of 695 ablation points in 13 patients were analyzed. There were 19 and 676 points with and without the PV gap, respectively. The PV gap group demonstrated significantly lower PF drop and contact force (-14 ± 43 Hz vs. 61 ± 57 Hz, p < 0.001; and 8 [7-10] g vs. 10 [4-14] g, p = 0.039), and higher post-PF (226 ± 49 Hz vs. 176 ± 47 Hz, p < 0.001) than in the non-PV gap group. The PF drop had the highest area under the curve of 0.878 (95% confidence interval: 0.791-0.964) on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting the PV gap, with a cutoff value of 10.5 Hz (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 89.5%).

Conclusion: PF drop during PVI is a useful parameter for predicting the non-PV gap with a high probability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
期刊最新文献
Regional differences in the outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the USA. Correlation between diagnosis-to-ablation time and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging for the prediction of ventricular tachycardia ablation outcome. Bipolar ablation: another arrow in the electrophysiologist's quiver when targeting intramural ventricular arrhythmias. Insights from optimal high-power ablation settings for anterior pulmonary vein wall isolation-A-Q-RATE POWER Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1