Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004534
Joanna Shaw, Megan Brenner
{"title":"Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know.","authors":"Joanna Shaw, Megan Brenner","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Hemorrhage remains one of the leading causes of death from traumatic injury in both the civilian and military populations. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive technique that can be used to treat hemorrhage in the critically ill. An alternative to maximally invasive methods such as resuscitative thoracotomy, REBOA is a temporizing measure to prevent exsanguination and allow for transition to definitive hemorrhage control. It is easily deployed by trained users and does not require surgical expertise to place. Its use has increased over the past decade with a growing body of literature that suggests it improves outcomes in select hemorrhagic trauma patients compared with patients who do not receive REBOA. REBOA has also been used for select nontraumatic cases. Judicious patient selection, knowing the technical aspects of placing REBOA, and clarity regarding its indications are key to maximize its efficacy as a mitigatory tool in hemorrhagic shock. This \"What You Need To Know\" review presents current evidence regarding use of REBOA for the acute care surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"831-839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Hemorrhage remains one of the leading causes of death from traumatic injury in both the civilian and military populations. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive technique that can be used to treat hemorrhage in the critically ill. An alternative to maximally invasive methods such as resuscitative thoracotomy, REBOA is a temporizing measure to prevent exsanguination and allow for transition to definitive hemorrhage control. It is easily deployed by trained users and does not require surgical expertise to place. Its use has increased over the past decade with a growing body of literature that suggests it improves outcomes in select hemorrhagic trauma patients compared with patients who do not receive REBOA. REBOA has also been used for select nontraumatic cases. Judicious patient selection, knowing the technical aspects of placing REBOA, and clarity regarding its indications are key to maximize its efficacy as a mitigatory tool in hemorrhagic shock. This "What You Need To Know" review presents current evidence regarding use of REBOA for the acute care surgeon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉:你需要知道的。
摘要:在平民和军人中,出血仍然是外伤性死亡的主要原因之一。复苏血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)是一种微创技术,可用于治疗危重患者出血。REBOA是一种替代最大侵入性方法,如复苏开胸术,是一种临时措施,以防止失血,并允许过渡到最终出血控制。它很容易由训练有素的用户部署,不需要外科专家来放置。在过去的十年中,越来越多的文献表明,与未接受REBOA的患者相比,它可以改善选择性出血性创伤患者的预后。REBOA也用于选择非创伤性病例。明智的患者选择,了解放置REBOA的技术方面,以及明确其适应症是最大限度地发挥其作为失血性休克缓解工具的功效的关键。这篇“你需要知道的”综述介绍了目前关于急性护理外科医生使用REBOA的证据。证据等级:V级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Early versus delayed appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in adult and pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of partial versus complete aortic occlusion on macro and microcirculatory flows in swine hemorrhagic shock. Trauma-specific revision of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria improves outcome prediction in severely injured patients. Combined intracranial hemorrhage subtypes should not change modified Brain Injury Guidelines criteria. Thrombocytosis is desirable in polytrauma: Natural history and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1