Antibiotics Use Practices in Otology Procedures: A Nationwide Survey Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004448
Azmi Marouf, Samya Konda, De'Andre Warren, Claudia I Cabrera, Sarah Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Daniel E Killeen
{"title":"Antibiotics Use Practices in Otology Procedures: A Nationwide Survey Study.","authors":"Azmi Marouf, Samya Konda, De'Andre Warren, Claudia I Cabrera, Sarah Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Daniel E Killeen","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess practice patterns regarding antibiotics prophylaxis in otologic surgery in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Members of American Neurotology Society (ANS).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Nationwide survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Prevalence of antibiotic prescribing among surgeons performing the following six ear surgical procedures: cochlear implantation, tympanoplasty with a clean ear, tympanoplasty with active drainage, cholesteatoma surgery without evidence of infection, cholesteatoma surgery with evidence of infection, and stapedectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three surgeons completed the survey (15.21% response rate). Twenty-seven percent had more than 25 years in experience, and 18% had 0 to 5 years of experience. Antibiotic prescribing practices varied by procedure: cochlear implantation (64.4%, median 5 d), tympanoplasty (clean ear: 23.3%, median 5 d; active drainage: 53.4%, median 7 d), cholesteatoma surgery (no infection: 30.1%, median 7 d; with infection: 58.9%, median 7 d), and stapedectomy (34.2%, mean 5 d). Cephalosporins were preferred for noninfected procedures, whereas amoxicillin dominated for active infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prophylactic oral antibiotics varies for ear surgery, with higher usage for procedures with active infection and a preference for cephalosporins in noninfected cases. These findings underscore the need for the development and dissemination of standardized, evidence-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"470-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess practice patterns regarding antibiotics prophylaxis in otologic surgery in the United States.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Tertiary care center.

Subjects: Members of American Neurotology Society (ANS).

Intervention: Nationwide survey.

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of antibiotic prescribing among surgeons performing the following six ear surgical procedures: cochlear implantation, tympanoplasty with a clean ear, tympanoplasty with active drainage, cholesteatoma surgery without evidence of infection, cholesteatoma surgery with evidence of infection, and stapedectomy.

Results: Seventy-three surgeons completed the survey (15.21% response rate). Twenty-seven percent had more than 25 years in experience, and 18% had 0 to 5 years of experience. Antibiotic prescribing practices varied by procedure: cochlear implantation (64.4%, median 5 d), tympanoplasty (clean ear: 23.3%, median 5 d; active drainage: 53.4%, median 7 d), cholesteatoma surgery (no infection: 30.1%, median 7 d; with infection: 58.9%, median 7 d), and stapedectomy (34.2%, mean 5 d). Cephalosporins were preferred for noninfected procedures, whereas amoxicillin dominated for active infections.

Conclusions: Prophylactic oral antibiotics varies for ear surgery, with higher usage for procedures with active infection and a preference for cephalosporins in noninfected cases. These findings underscore the need for the development and dissemination of standardized, evidence-based recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳科手术中抗生素使用实践:一项全国性调查研究。
目的:评估美国耳科手术中抗生素预防的实践模式。研究设计:横断面研究。环境:三级保健中心。研究对象:美国神经学学会(ANS)成员。干预措施:全国调查。主要观察指标:在进行以下六种耳科手术的外科医生中,抗生素处方的患病率:人工耳蜗植入、清洁耳鼓室成形术、主动引流鼓室成形术、无感染证据的胆脂瘤手术、有感染证据的胆脂瘤手术和镫骨切除术。结果:73名外科医生完成调查,有效率15.21%。27%的人有超过25年的工作经验,18%的人有0到5年的工作经验。抗生素处方做法因手术而异:人工耳蜗植入(64.4%,中位5天),鼓室成形术(清洁耳:23.3%,中位5天;主动引流:53.4%,中位7 d),胆脂瘤手术(无感染:30.1%,中位7 d;感染:58.9%,平均7天)和镫骨切除术(34.2%,平均5天)。非感染手术首选头孢菌素,而活动性感染主要是阿莫西林。结论:预防性口服抗生素因耳科手术而异,活动性感染患者使用较多,而非感染病例更倾向于使用头孢菌素。这些发现强调需要制定和传播标准化的、以证据为基础的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Multiple Sclerosis Presenting With Pseudo-Labyrinthitis. AI at the Helm: Evaluating Claude 3.5 Sonet and ChatGPT-4.0 in Tympanoplasty Management. Traumatic BPPV-A Large Series Analysis of 4839 Patients, Including Comprehensive Vestibular Testing. Bilateral Sequential Vestibular Neuritis: Report of Three Cases. 3D-Printed Portable Video-Ooculography Device (UNySi cam): A New Tool for Eye Movement Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1