Effect of Added Inhaled Corticosteroids to Systemic Steroids on COPD Exacerbation Outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/respcare.11954
Eyal Kleinhendler, Noa Shopen, Neta Cohen, Ophir Freund, Tal Perluk, Evgeni Gershman, Avraham Unterman, Amir Bar-Shai
{"title":"Effect of Added Inhaled Corticosteroids to Systemic Steroids on COPD Exacerbation Outcomes.","authors":"Eyal Kleinhendler, Noa Shopen, Neta Cohen, Ophir Freund, Tal Perluk, Evgeni Gershman, Avraham Unterman, Amir Bar-Shai","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> COPD exacerbations are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a role as long-term treatment, their efficacy in exacerbations, particularly as an adjunct to systemic steroids, remains unclear. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data from 870 subjects admitted with COPD exacerbations to a tertiary medical center in Israel from January 2018-January 2023. We investigated the impact of adding ICS to standard systemic steroid treatment on hospital length of stay, intubation rates, and 30-d mortality using propensity score matching to account for confounders. <b>Results:</b> The cohort, after matching, included 354 subjects treated with systemic steroids and ICS and 121 treated with systemic steroids alone. All characteristics were similar between the groups. Our analysis showed no differences in 30-d mortality (7.1% vs 5.8%, <i>P</i> = .63) or secondary outcomes (intubation, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates) between the groups. Subgroup analyses based on different eosinophil levels did not alter these findings. In multivariate analysis among the general cohort, eosinophil count <150 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.87], <i>P</i> = .02) and high Charlson score (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [95% CI 1.02-1.37], <i>P</i> = .02) were independent predictors for 30-d mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite the known benefits of ICS in managing chronic COPD, we did not find an added value of ICS to systemic steroids in exacerbations. These results underscore the necessity for individualized treatment strategies and further research into the role of ICS in COPD exacerbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"70 1","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COPD exacerbations are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a role as long-term treatment, their efficacy in exacerbations, particularly as an adjunct to systemic steroids, remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data from 870 subjects admitted with COPD exacerbations to a tertiary medical center in Israel from January 2018-January 2023. We investigated the impact of adding ICS to standard systemic steroid treatment on hospital length of stay, intubation rates, and 30-d mortality using propensity score matching to account for confounders. Results: The cohort, after matching, included 354 subjects treated with systemic steroids and ICS and 121 treated with systemic steroids alone. All characteristics were similar between the groups. Our analysis showed no differences in 30-d mortality (7.1% vs 5.8%, P = .63) or secondary outcomes (intubation, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates) between the groups. Subgroup analyses based on different eosinophil levels did not alter these findings. In multivariate analysis among the general cohort, eosinophil count <150 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.87], P = .02) and high Charlson score (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [95% CI 1.02-1.37], P = .02) were independent predictors for 30-d mortality. Conclusions: Despite the known benefits of ICS in managing chronic COPD, we did not find an added value of ICS to systemic steroids in exacerbations. These results underscore the necessity for individualized treatment strategies and further research into the role of ICS in COPD exacerbations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加吸入皮质类固醇与全身类固醇对COPD加重结局的影响。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺病加重是发病和死亡的主要原因。尽管吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)作为长期治疗有一定作用,但其在急性发作中的疗效,特别是作为全身性类固醇的辅助治疗,尚不清楚。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们分析了2018年1月至2023年1月在以色列一家三级医疗中心入院的870名COPD加重患者的数据。我们调查了在标准全身类固醇治疗中加入ICS对住院时间、插管率和30天死亡率的影响,使用倾向评分匹配来解释混杂因素。结果:匹配后,该队列包括354名接受全身类固醇和ICS治疗的受试者,121名单独接受全身类固醇治疗的受试者。两组间的所有特征相似。我们的分析显示,两组之间30天死亡率(7.1% vs 5.8%, P = 0.63)或次要结局(插管、住院时间和再入院率)无差异。基于不同嗜酸性粒细胞水平的亚组分析没有改变这些发现。在普通队列的多变量分析中,嗜酸性粒细胞计数(P = 0.02)和高Charlson评分(校正优势比1.19 [95% CI 1.02-1.37], P = 0.02)是30天死亡率的独立预测因子。结论:尽管已知ICS在治疗慢性COPD方面有益处,但我们没有发现ICS在急性发作时与全身性类固醇相比有附加价值。这些结果强调了个体化治疗策略和进一步研究ICS在COPD加重中的作用的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Staffing and Daily Assignments in Respiratory Care Departments. Effect of Wearing a Surgical Mask or N95 Mask in Patients With Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure. Predictors of Respiratory Oscillometry Measurements in a Healthy Population. Extended Prone Positioning in ARDS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Reduces Ventilatory Requirements During Endobronchial Ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1