Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/respcare.12082
Darío S Villalba, Amelia Matesa, Sabrina Boni, Facundo J Gutiérrez, Roque Moracci, Gustavo A Plotnikow
{"title":"Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans.","authors":"Darío S Villalba, Amelia Matesa, Sabrina Boni, Facundo J Gutiérrez, Roque Moracci, Gustavo A Plotnikow","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The understanding of how pharyngeal pressure is transmitted to the trachea with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) implementation and the behavior of tracheal pressure in the presence of mouth leaks remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of HFNC administration on tracheal pressure by comparing measurements taken with open and closed mouth with varying flows. <b>Methods:</b> A crossover study was conducted between March 2019 and June 2023. Subjects age > 18 years, with a tracheostomy and who were in the process of decannulation were included. Tracheal and pharyngeal pressures were measured by using specific devices, with different HFNC flows and mouth conditions. <b>Results:</b> Nine subjects were assessed: 77% women, with an average age of 60.5 years. Tracheal pressure was significantly higher than pharyngeal pressure only in baseline conditions (<i>P</i> = .03). With regard to the rest of the scenarios, there were no significant differences between both pressures. Tracheal pressure was higher than the baseline condition both with an open mouth and a closed mouth (<i>P</i> = .02). The tracheal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than at 40 L/min (<i>P</i> = .042). The median pharyngeal pressure with a closed mouth was higher than with an open mouth, both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (<i>P</i> = .048 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). Pharyngeal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than both baseline condition and at 40 L/min (<i>P</i> = .002 and <i>P</i> = .043, respectively). However, pharyngeal pressure with the closed mouth was significantly higher than with the open mouth both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (<i>P</i> = .031 and <i>P</i> = .02 respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> The implementation of HFNC changes airway pressures with values that impact at a tracheal level as flow increases. Our data contribute to the difficult interpretation of the existing interrelation between the flow and its effects on the respiratory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"70 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The understanding of how pharyngeal pressure is transmitted to the trachea with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) implementation and the behavior of tracheal pressure in the presence of mouth leaks remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of HFNC administration on tracheal pressure by comparing measurements taken with open and closed mouth with varying flows. Methods: A crossover study was conducted between March 2019 and June 2023. Subjects age > 18 years, with a tracheostomy and who were in the process of decannulation were included. Tracheal and pharyngeal pressures were measured by using specific devices, with different HFNC flows and mouth conditions. Results: Nine subjects were assessed: 77% women, with an average age of 60.5 years. Tracheal pressure was significantly higher than pharyngeal pressure only in baseline conditions (P = .03). With regard to the rest of the scenarios, there were no significant differences between both pressures. Tracheal pressure was higher than the baseline condition both with an open mouth and a closed mouth (P = .02). The tracheal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than at 40 L/min (P = .042). The median pharyngeal pressure with a closed mouth was higher than with an open mouth, both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (P = .048 and P < .001, respectively). Pharyngeal pressure at 60 L/min with an open mouth was higher than both baseline condition and at 40 L/min (P = .002 and P = .043, respectively). However, pharyngeal pressure with the closed mouth was significantly higher than with the open mouth both with 40 and 60 L/min of flow (P = .031 and P = .02 respectively). Conclusions: The implementation of HFNC changes airway pressures with values that impact at a tracheal level as flow increases. Our data contribute to the difficult interpretation of the existing interrelation between the flow and its effects on the respiratory system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高流量鼻插管氧疗对人体气道系统压力的影响。
背景:对于高流量鼻插管(HFNC)时咽部压力如何传递到气管以及存在口漏时气管压力的行为的理解仍然存在争议。本研究旨在通过比较不同流量下张嘴和闭口的测量结果来评估HFNC给药对气管压力的影响。方法:2019年3月至2023年6月进行交叉研究。纳入年龄在18岁至18岁之间,已行气管切开术且正在进行脱管术的受试者。在不同的HFNC流量和口腔条件下,使用特定的设备测量气管和咽压。结果:共纳入9例受试者,女性77%,平均年龄60.5岁。仅在基线条件下,气管压力显著高于咽压(P = 0.03)。至于其他情况,两种压力之间没有显著差异。两组患者气管压力均高于对照组(P = 0.02)。60 L/min时气管压力高于40 L/min时(P = 0.042)。闭口咽压中位数高于张开口咽压中位数,流量均为40 L/min和60 L/min (P分别= 0.048和P < 0.001)。张口60 L/min时的咽压高于基线和40 L/min时(P = 0.002和P = 0.043)。而当流量为40 L/min和60 L/min时,闭口咽压均显著高于张开口咽压(P = 0.031和P = 0.02)。结论:HFNC的实施改变了气道压力,其值随着流量的增加而影响气管水平。我们的数据有助于解释现有的血流及其对呼吸系统的影响之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Heat-Moisture Exchangers and Dead Space Compensation on CO2 Clearance and Mechanical Power in Critically Ill Intubated Subjects. Electrical Impedance Tomography Accurately Reflects Regional Ventilation Distribution Compared with Computed Tomography in Non-Intubated Subjects. Added to the Circuit, Added to the Load: Passive Humidifiers and Their Impact on Dead Space, Gas Exchange, and Mechanical Power. Obesity Modifies the Effect of PEEP During Spontaneous Breathing in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. CPAP Versus Conventional Oxygenation Postextubation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1