A Bench Model of Asynchrony in 6 Ventilators Equipped With Waveform-Guided Options.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1089/respcare.11422
Isabella Maria Bianchi, Eric Arisi, Marco Pozzi, Anita Orlando, Roberta Puce, Giuseppe Maggio, Federico Capra Marzani, Francesco Mojoli
{"title":"A Bench Model of Asynchrony in 6 Ventilators Equipped With Waveform-Guided Options.","authors":"Isabella Maria Bianchi, Eric Arisi, Marco Pozzi, Anita Orlando, Roberta Puce, Giuseppe Maggio, Federico Capra Marzani, Francesco Mojoli","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pressure support ventilation is frequently associated with patient-ventilator asynchrony. Algorithms based on ventilator waveforms have been developed to automatically detect patient respiratory activity and to guide triggering and cycling. The aim of this study was to assess the performance in terms of synchronization of 6 mechanical ventilators, all provided with a waveform-guided software. <b>Methods:</b> This was a bench study to compare standard and new-generation systems simulating different respiratory mechanics, levels of assistance, and respiratory efforts. Six mechanical ventilators were tested: Hamilton G5 (G5) and C6 (C6), IMT bellavista1000 (B1000), Mindray SV300, and Philips RespironicsV200 (V200) and V60 (V60). Apart from V60, the other ventilators were tested twice: with default settings for standard triggering and cycling and with the waveform-guided automation. <b>Results:</b> With the automated settings, breaths with trigger delay ≤ 300 ms increased with B1000, G5, and C6. Ineffective efforts decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200. Improvement of triggering was mainly driven by findings obtained in the obstructive profile. With the automated settings, breaths with cycling delay > 300 ms decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200 while early cycled breaths increased with B1000. Improvement of cycling was mainly driven by findings obtained in the obstructive profile, whereas worsening of cycling was observed in the restrictive profile with 2 ventilators (B100 and V200). With the automated settings, the asynchrony index (AI) was reduced with G5 and C6 when all the profiles were grouped. In the obstructive profile, the AI decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200; in the restrictive profile, the AI increased with B1000. <b>Conclusions:</b> Waveforms-based algorithms have the potential to improve patient-ventilator synchronization. Automation had the most favorable impact when obstructive patients were simulated, while caution should be paid with restrictive ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"510-521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure support ventilation is frequently associated with patient-ventilator asynchrony. Algorithms based on ventilator waveforms have been developed to automatically detect patient respiratory activity and to guide triggering and cycling. The aim of this study was to assess the performance in terms of synchronization of 6 mechanical ventilators, all provided with a waveform-guided software. Methods: This was a bench study to compare standard and new-generation systems simulating different respiratory mechanics, levels of assistance, and respiratory efforts. Six mechanical ventilators were tested: Hamilton G5 (G5) and C6 (C6), IMT bellavista1000 (B1000), Mindray SV300, and Philips RespironicsV200 (V200) and V60 (V60). Apart from V60, the other ventilators were tested twice: with default settings for standard triggering and cycling and with the waveform-guided automation. Results: With the automated settings, breaths with trigger delay ≤ 300 ms increased with B1000, G5, and C6. Ineffective efforts decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200. Improvement of triggering was mainly driven by findings obtained in the obstructive profile. With the automated settings, breaths with cycling delay > 300 ms decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200 while early cycled breaths increased with B1000. Improvement of cycling was mainly driven by findings obtained in the obstructive profile, whereas worsening of cycling was observed in the restrictive profile with 2 ventilators (B100 and V200). With the automated settings, the asynchrony index (AI) was reduced with G5 and C6 when all the profiles were grouped. In the obstructive profile, the AI decreased with B1000, G5, C6, and V200; in the restrictive profile, the AI increased with B1000. Conclusions: Waveforms-based algorithms have the potential to improve patient-ventilator synchronization. Automation had the most favorable impact when obstructive patients were simulated, while caution should be paid with restrictive ones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配备波形引导选项的6台呼吸机的异步台架模型。
背景:压力支持通气常与患者-呼吸机不同步相关。基于呼吸机波形的算法已被开发用于自动检测患者呼吸活动并指导触发和循环。本研究的目的是评估6台机械呼吸机的同步性能,这些呼吸机都配备了波形引导软件。方法:这是一项比较标准和新一代系统模拟不同的呼吸力学,辅助水平和呼吸努力的实验研究。测试了6台机械呼吸机:Hamilton G5 (G5)和C6 (C6)、IMT bellavista1000 (B1000)、迈瑞SV300和飞利浦呼吸器sv200 (V200)和V60 (V60)。除V60外,其他通风机进行了两次测试:默认设置为标准触发和循环,波形引导自动化。结果:在自动设置下,B1000、G5、C6触发延迟≤300 ms的呼吸次数增加。B1000、G5、C6和V200的无效努力减少。触发的改善主要是由在梗阻性剖面图中获得的发现所驱动的。在自动设置下,B1000、G5、C6和V200时,循环延迟> 300 ms的呼吸次数减少,B1000时,早期循环呼吸次数增加。循环的改善主要是由阻塞性的结果所驱动的,而在使用2个呼吸机(B100和V200)的限制性呼吸机中,循环的恶化被观察到。通过自动设置,当对所有配置文件进行分组时,G5和C6的异步索引(AI)降低了。在梗阻性剖面图上,AI随着B1000、G5、C6和V200的增加而降低;在限制性条件下,AI随B1000的增加而增加。结论:基于波形的算法具有改善患者-呼吸机同步的潜力。在模拟阻塞性患者时,自动化效果最好,而在模拟限制性患者时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Heat-Moisture Exchangers and Dead Space Compensation on CO2 Clearance and Mechanical Power in Critically Ill Intubated Subjects. Electrical Impedance Tomography Accurately Reflects Regional Ventilation Distribution Compared with Computed Tomography in Non-Intubated Subjects. Added to the Circuit, Added to the Load: Passive Humidifiers and Their Impact on Dead Space, Gas Exchange, and Mechanical Power. Obesity Modifies the Effect of PEEP During Spontaneous Breathing in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. CPAP Versus Conventional Oxygenation Postextubation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1