Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Clinical Practice and Current Clinical Practice Guidelines.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1089/respcare.12478
Morgan E Sorg, Kristen L McHenry
{"title":"Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Clinical Practice and Current Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Morgan E Sorg, Kristen L McHenry","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The literature suggests there is variability in the clinical practice of spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Evidence-based literature and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published over time to address various aspects of SBT implementation. It can take many years for evidence-based recommendations to be adopted into clinical practice. The American Association for Respiratory Care recently published a CPG addressing 4 aspects of SBT implementation. <b>Methods:</b> This study evaluated how the clinical practice of SBTs compares to the recommendations of the CPG. An online survey was developed to assess how hospitals with SBT protocols perform different components of SBTs. Descriptive statistics were used in the data analysis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 26 representatives from different health care institutions in the United States met the criteria for data analysis; 61.5% of reported protocols use rapid shallow breathing index, which is not in alignment with the current recommendation; 77% reported the use of pressure support (PS); 11.5% specified the use of a T-piece, and 11% specified the option of either PS or T-piece during the SBT. The responses were 100% in alignment with the current recommendation of performing a SBT with or without support; 73.1% aligned with having a standardized approach to performing SBTs by specifying when the SBT will be initiated; 65.4% perform an SBT during the day, though it was not specified if it occurs before noon each day; 53.8% allow for an increase in F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> during an SBT, which is not in alignment with the current recommendations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reported hospitals' protocols demonstrated moderate alignment with the 4 CPG recommendations. Identifying current discrepancies between clinical practice and CPGs will allow for the assessment of the adoption of recommendations into clinical practice over time. Further assessment could be performed to determine if there is an impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"477-484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The literature suggests there is variability in the clinical practice of spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Evidence-based literature and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published over time to address various aspects of SBT implementation. It can take many years for evidence-based recommendations to be adopted into clinical practice. The American Association for Respiratory Care recently published a CPG addressing 4 aspects of SBT implementation. Methods: This study evaluated how the clinical practice of SBTs compares to the recommendations of the CPG. An online survey was developed to assess how hospitals with SBT protocols perform different components of SBTs. Descriptive statistics were used in the data analysis. Results: A total of 26 representatives from different health care institutions in the United States met the criteria for data analysis; 61.5% of reported protocols use rapid shallow breathing index, which is not in alignment with the current recommendation; 77% reported the use of pressure support (PS); 11.5% specified the use of a T-piece, and 11% specified the option of either PS or T-piece during the SBT. The responses were 100% in alignment with the current recommendation of performing a SBT with or without support; 73.1% aligned with having a standardized approach to performing SBTs by specifying when the SBT will be initiated; 65.4% perform an SBT during the day, though it was not specified if it occurs before noon each day; 53.8% allow for an increase in FIO2 during an SBT, which is not in alignment with the current recommendations. Conclusions: The reported hospitals' protocols demonstrated moderate alignment with the 4 CPG recommendations. Identifying current discrepancies between clinical practice and CPGs will allow for the assessment of the adoption of recommendations into clinical practice over time. Further assessment could be performed to determine if there is an impact on patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床实践中自主呼吸试验与现行临床实践指南的比较。
背景:文献表明,在临床实践的自主呼吸试验(sbt)存在变异性。随着时间的推移,基于证据的文献和临床实践指南(cpg)已经出版,以解决SBT实施的各个方面。循证建议可能需要多年时间才能被临床实践所采纳。美国呼吸护理协会最近发布了一份CPG,涉及SBT实施的4个方面。方法:本研究评估了SBTs的临床实践与CPG建议的比较。开展了一项在线调查,以评估采用SBT协议的医院如何执行SBT的不同组成部分。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:来自美国不同医疗机构的26名代表符合数据分析标准;61.5%的报告方案使用快速浅呼吸指数,这与目前的建议不一致;77%的人使用压力支撑(PS);11.5%指定在SBT期间使用T-piece, 11%指定PS或T-piece的选择。调查结果100%符合目前关于在有或没有支持的情况下实施SBT的建议;73.1%的受访者同意采用标准化方法执行SBT,具体规定何时启动SBT;65.4%的人在白天执行SBT,但没有说明是否在每天中午之前执行;53.8%的人允许在SBT期间增加FIO2,这与目前的建议不一致。结论:报告的医院方案与CPG的4项建议适度一致。识别当前临床实践和CPGs之间的差异,将允许随着时间的推移对临床实践中建议的采用进行评估。可以进行进一步评估以确定是否对患者预后有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Positioning of Diaphragm Electrical Activity Catheter in Premature Infants (PIPI Trial). Delivered Oxygen Concentrations of Two Nonrebreather Reservoir Masks. Fan Therapy for Dyspnea in Palliative and Supportive Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Acute Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure on Breathing Pattern and Chest Wall Volumes During Cycle Exercise in COPD Patients. Pathophysiological Impact of Delayed Sternal Closure on the Respiratory System and Hemodynamics in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1