Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Invasive Ventilation for Bacterial Pneumonia in the United States.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1089/respcare.12213
Mohamad El Labban, Roba El Zibaoui, Karine Eid, Perla Mansour, Mohamad Wehbe, Wigdan Farah, Yewande Odeyemi
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Invasive Ventilation for Bacterial Pneumonia in the United States.","authors":"Mohamad El Labban, Roba El Zibaoui, Karine Eid, Perla Mansour, Mohamad Wehbe, Wigdan Farah, Yewande Odeyemi","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Previous reports have emphasized disparities in the utilization of invasive respiratory support for bacterial pneumonia among various racial and ethnic minority groups with bacterial pneumonia. However, there is a shortage of detailed epidemiological data on this, particularly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> We used the National In-patient Sample to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis from 2017 to 2021. We included patients hospitalized across the United States with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. Statistical methods used included Pearson chi-square and multivariable regression analyses. Examining racial and ethnic differences in hospitalized subjects' usage of invasive mechanical ventilation for bacterial pneumonia was the primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcomes included mortality, use of noninvasive ventilation, and hospital stay. <b>Results:</b> The study found significant differences among racial and ethnic groups in pneumonia-related outcomes and the need for advanced respiratory ventilator assistance. Black and Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) subjects had the highest rates of invasive mechanical ventilation compared with other racial groups, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) indicating a higher likelihood of requiring this intervention for Black (OR 1.15) and AAPI (OR 1.31) subjects. For secondary outcomes, Black and AAPI subjects experienced longer hospital stays than other racial and ethnic groups. Noninvasive ventilation rates were comparable across groups. Mortality rates were the highest among Black subjects, but were elevated for all racial and ethnic minority subjects compared with white subjects. The pandemic exacerbated these disparities, leading to increased rates of both invasive and noninvasive ventilation and higher mortality, with particularly pronounced effects seen in AAPI patients, thereby worsening existing health inequities. <b>Conclusions:</b> The study suggests potential racial-ethnic disparities in invasive mechanical ventilation use among Black and AAPI subjects, but further investigation is needed to confirm these findings and explore underlying causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"865-872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous reports have emphasized disparities in the utilization of invasive respiratory support for bacterial pneumonia among various racial and ethnic minority groups with bacterial pneumonia. However, there is a shortage of detailed epidemiological data on this, particularly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We used the National In-patient Sample to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis from 2017 to 2021. We included patients hospitalized across the United States with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. Statistical methods used included Pearson chi-square and multivariable regression analyses. Examining racial and ethnic differences in hospitalized subjects' usage of invasive mechanical ventilation for bacterial pneumonia was the primary outcome of the study. Secondary outcomes included mortality, use of noninvasive ventilation, and hospital stay. Results: The study found significant differences among racial and ethnic groups in pneumonia-related outcomes and the need for advanced respiratory ventilator assistance. Black and Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) subjects had the highest rates of invasive mechanical ventilation compared with other racial groups, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) indicating a higher likelihood of requiring this intervention for Black (OR 1.15) and AAPI (OR 1.31) subjects. For secondary outcomes, Black and AAPI subjects experienced longer hospital stays than other racial and ethnic groups. Noninvasive ventilation rates were comparable across groups. Mortality rates were the highest among Black subjects, but were elevated for all racial and ethnic minority subjects compared with white subjects. The pandemic exacerbated these disparities, leading to increased rates of both invasive and noninvasive ventilation and higher mortality, with particularly pronounced effects seen in AAPI patients, thereby worsening existing health inequities. Conclusions: The study suggests potential racial-ethnic disparities in invasive mechanical ventilation use among Black and AAPI subjects, but further investigation is needed to confirm these findings and explore underlying causes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国细菌性肺炎有创通气的种族差异
背景:以前的报告强调了不同种族和少数民族细菌性肺炎患者在使用有创呼吸支持治疗细菌性肺炎方面的差异。然而,这方面缺乏详细的流行病学数据,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发后。方法:采用2017 - 2021年全国住院患者样本进行回顾性队列分析。我们纳入了美国各地初步诊断为细菌性肺炎的住院患者。统计方法包括皮尔逊卡方分析和多变量回归分析。研究的主要结果是检查住院患者使用有创机械通气治疗细菌性肺炎的种族和民族差异。次要结局包括死亡率、无创通气的使用和住院时间。结果:该研究发现,在肺炎相关结局和对高级呼吸机辅助的需求方面,种族和民族之间存在显著差异。与其他种族相比,黑人和亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民(AAPI)受试者的有创机械通气率最高,调整后的优势比(OR)表明黑人(OR 1.15)和AAPI (OR 1.31)受试者需要这种干预的可能性更高。对于次要结果,黑人和亚太裔受试者比其他种族和族裔群体的住院时间更长。各组间无创通气率具有可比性。黑人受试者的死亡率最高,但与白人受试者相比,所有种族和少数民族受试者的死亡率都有所上升。大流行加剧了这些差异,导致有创和无创通气率增加,死亡率更高,对亚太裔患者的影响尤为明显,从而加剧了现有的卫生不平等。结论:本研究提示黑人和AAPI受试者在有创机械通气使用方面存在潜在的种族差异,但需要进一步的调查来证实这些发现并探索潜在的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Undiagnosed COPD Using Machine Learning-Based Classification. Correction of Patient-Ventilator Discordance. Impact of Palliative Care Timing on Costs and Interventions in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. Positioning and Flow Effects on Lung Volume in Asymmetric High-Flow Nasal Cannula. Use of Simulation in Educating Caregivers of Children With Tracheostomies: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1