Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR MRI in the detection of meningitis.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3018
P Sanjay, Vittal Manohar, Sushmita Balol, Yashwanth M B Naik
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR MRI in the detection of meningitis.","authors":"P Sanjay, Vittal Manohar, Sushmita Balol, Yashwanth M B Naik","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR (CE-T2-FLAIR) sequence on MRI, through the suppression of CSF and vascular signals, can detect subtle meningeal enhancement in meningitis that may not be appreciable on the routinely used contrast-enhanced T1W (CE-T1W) sequence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess CE-T2-FLAIR compared to CE-T1W in the diagnosis of meningitis, using CSF analysis as the gold standard, using both qualitative and quantitative approaches for assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 53 patients with clinically suspected meningitis referred for brain MRI. Twenty-seven patients, positive for meningitis on CSF analysis, were classified as the case group; the remaining patients were designated as controls. The pre-contrast, CE-T1W and CE-T2-FLAIR images were assessed and analysed, qualitatively for the detection of abnormal meningeal enhancement, and quantitatively by measuring single pixel signal intensities (SPSI) over the meninges and vessels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (92.59% vs. 57.69%), negative predictive value (92.59% vs. 70.27%) and diagnostic accuracy (94.34% vs. 78.85%) compared to CE-T1W. Additionally, CE-T2-FLAIR showed significantly greater meningeal SPSI and enhancement than CE-T1W.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR is better at detecting abnormal meningeal enhancement in meningitis than CE-T1W, because of significantly greater signal intensity and enhancement of the meninges compared to vessels.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study reiterates the usefulness of CE-T2-FLAIR as an additional sequence for the detection of abnormal meningeal enhancement in cases of meningitis as confirmed both qualitatively and quantitatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"3018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR (CE-T2-FLAIR) sequence on MRI, through the suppression of CSF and vascular signals, can detect subtle meningeal enhancement in meningitis that may not be appreciable on the routinely used contrast-enhanced T1W (CE-T1W) sequence.

Objectives: To assess CE-T2-FLAIR compared to CE-T1W in the diagnosis of meningitis, using CSF analysis as the gold standard, using both qualitative and quantitative approaches for assessment.

Method: A retrospective study was conducted on 53 patients with clinically suspected meningitis referred for brain MRI. Twenty-seven patients, positive for meningitis on CSF analysis, were classified as the case group; the remaining patients were designated as controls. The pre-contrast, CE-T1W and CE-T2-FLAIR images were assessed and analysed, qualitatively for the detection of abnormal meningeal enhancement, and quantitatively by measuring single pixel signal intensities (SPSI) over the meninges and vessels.

Results: Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (92.59% vs. 57.69%), negative predictive value (92.59% vs. 70.27%) and diagnostic accuracy (94.34% vs. 78.85%) compared to CE-T1W. Additionally, CE-T2-FLAIR showed significantly greater meningeal SPSI and enhancement than CE-T1W.

Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR is better at detecting abnormal meningeal enhancement in meningitis than CE-T1W, because of significantly greater signal intensity and enhancement of the meninges compared to vessels.

Contribution: This study reiterates the usefulness of CE-T2-FLAIR as an additional sequence for the detection of abnormal meningeal enhancement in cases of meningitis as confirmed both qualitatively and quantitatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR MRI in the detection of meningitis. Perceptions and attitudes towards AI among trainee and qualified radiologists at selected South African training hospitals. Thinking outside tuberculosis: A case of widespread active disseminated cysticercosis. Sustainable radiology in South Africa. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT with electron-density reconstruction for lumbar disc herniation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1