Optimised two-stage technique for sheath-dilator insertion in peripherally inserted central catheter placement.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1177/11297298251320490
Ting-Chia Young, Kuang-Hua Cheng, Kuan-Pen Yu
{"title":"Optimised two-stage technique for sheath-dilator insertion in peripherally inserted central catheter placement.","authors":"Ting-Chia Young, Kuang-Hua Cheng, Kuan-Pen Yu","doi":"10.1177/11297298251320490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provide a valuable alternative to traditional central venous access, offering smaller-diameter lines and supporting prolonged infusion therapy. Although recent advancements have addressed many of the initial challenges of PICC insertion, some catheter-related complications remain significant. In cases of mechanical complications, shearing of the peel-away sheath typically occurs while inserting the sheath-dilator, necessitating further dermatotomy and thereby increasing patient morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The alternative technique involved disassembling the sheath-dilator apparatus into its individual components: the peel-away sheath and introducer dilator. After successfully advancing the guidewire through the needle, the dilator alone was inserted over the guidewire and then removed. Subsequently, the dilator and sheath were reassembled and inserted simultaneously through the skin. The study included four patients (mean age, 55.75 (range: 26-78) years), all of whom underwent PICC placement using the proposed method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Advanced dilator insertion effectively prevented sheath shearing and facilitated successful PICC placement on the first attempt in all patients. No haematomas or catheter-related complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the alternative technique, a high success rate of first-attempt PICC insertions was achieved. This approach may reduce the need for additional dermatotomy, thus minimising patient morbidity and improving procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"2103-2109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251320490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provide a valuable alternative to traditional central venous access, offering smaller-diameter lines and supporting prolonged infusion therapy. Although recent advancements have addressed many of the initial challenges of PICC insertion, some catheter-related complications remain significant. In cases of mechanical complications, shearing of the peel-away sheath typically occurs while inserting the sheath-dilator, necessitating further dermatotomy and thereby increasing patient morbidity.

Materials and methods: The alternative technique involved disassembling the sheath-dilator apparatus into its individual components: the peel-away sheath and introducer dilator. After successfully advancing the guidewire through the needle, the dilator alone was inserted over the guidewire and then removed. Subsequently, the dilator and sheath were reassembled and inserted simultaneously through the skin. The study included four patients (mean age, 55.75 (range: 26-78) years), all of whom underwent PICC placement using the proposed method.

Results: Advanced dilator insertion effectively prevented sheath shearing and facilitated successful PICC placement on the first attempt in all patients. No haematomas or catheter-related complications were observed.

Conclusions: Using the alternative technique, a high success rate of first-attempt PICC insertions was achieved. This approach may reduce the need for additional dermatotomy, thus minimising patient morbidity and improving procedural outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化两阶段技术的鞘扩张器插入在周围插入中心导管置入。
背景:外周插入中心导管(PICCs)提供了一个有价值的替代传统中心静脉通路,提供更小直径的线和支持长时间的输液治疗。尽管最近的进展已经解决了PICC插入的许多最初挑战,但一些导管相关的并发症仍然很严重。在机械并发症的情况下,通常在插入鞘扩张器时发生剥离鞘的剪切,需要进一步的皮肤切开术,从而增加患者的发病率。材料和方法:另一种方法是将鞘扩张器拆卸成单独的组件:剥离鞘和引入扩张器。成功地将导丝穿过针头后,将扩张器单独插入导丝上,然后取出。随后,扩张器和鞘被重新组装并同时通过皮肤插入。该研究纳入4例患者(平均年龄55.75岁(范围26-78岁)),均采用上述方法行PICC置入术。结果:先进的扩张器插入有效地防止了鞘剪,并促进了所有患者在第一次尝试中成功放置PICC。无血肿或导管相关并发症。结论:采用替代技术可获得较高的首次PICC插入成功率。这种方法可以减少额外的皮肤切开术的需要,从而最大限度地减少患者的发病率和改善手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Intracavitary electrocardiography for 1‑Fr epicutaneous‑cava catheter tip location in neonates: 6‑Year retrospective study. Rethinking surveillance of arteriovenous access: The unmet potential of Doppler ultrasound and the emerging role of multiparametric ultrasound. Central venous catheter selection in mediastinal tumors: An integrated clinical, ultrasound, and CT-based approach. Apparent catheter malposition on chest radiography in patients with chest-to-arm tunnelled CICCs: A case series. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery cannulation in patients with obesity: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1