A review of the response and the emergency medical teams (EMTs) deployment in Armenia following an explosion at a fuel depot near Stepanakert (Nagorno-Karabakh)/ in Armenia.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Conflict and Health Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s13031-025-00649-1
Armen Melkonyan, Boniface Oyugi, Eugeniu Conovali, Oleg Storozhenko, Geert Gijs, Lusine Paronyan, Pryanka Relan, Flavio Salio
{"title":"A review of the response and the emergency medical teams (EMTs) deployment in Armenia following an explosion at a fuel depot near Stepanakert (Nagorno-Karabakh)/ in Armenia.","authors":"Armen Melkonyan, Boniface Oyugi, Eugeniu Conovali, Oleg Storozhenko, Geert Gijs, Lusine Paronyan, Pryanka Relan, Flavio Salio","doi":"10.1186/s13031-025-00649-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An explosion at a fuel depot in the region of Berkadzor, around 6 km near Stepanakert in Nagorno-Karabakh, happened on September 25, 2023 resulting in more than 220 lost lives and around 300 injuries. The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia (MoH), collaborating with the WHO, requested assistance for burn specialised care teams and medical evacuation.</p><p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To describe the emergency response learnings by reflecting on Armenia's experience managing the incident and the international EMTs' role in responding to it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study whose data was compiled through a triangulation of data obtained from the EMT teams using information management tools, including an EMT Minimum Data Set (MDS) specifically designed for coordinating burns responses in a daily reporting format and others from the MoH and medical evacuation (Medevac) teams, together with the information and analysis from field coordination meetings and deliberation with MoH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four international EMTs (I-EMTs) were deployed to Armenia in coordination with the MoH and WHO. They were well-prepared and self-sufficient, but the response highlighted the need for standardized protocols for Medevac and burns care. Nearly half of the patients were critical on the first day, with 58% in non-ICU centers and 42% in ICU, with 20 patients medically evacuated using draft Medevac guidelines. Severely burned patients in non-ICU units received 24-hour care from intensive care specialists. However, the shortage of ICU and specialized burns beds in Armenian hospitals was evident. The Emergency Medical Teams Coordination Cell (EMTCC) team effectively used information management tools to collect, process, analyze, and disseminate data to the MoH and response teams, facilitating rapid deployment and decision-making. The EMTs collaborated with local hospital staff, ensuring coordination with MoH and hospital management for follow-up and supply delivery. This integrated approach built local capacity, developed essential rehabilitation modules for burned patients, and delivered burn kits and surgical equipment. Early international assistance, coordinated by WHO and MoH, facilitated a rapid response, early EMT CC installation, and improved communication, ensuring the delivery of essential burn kits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to set standards for elements such as Medevac and burns care through the WHO EMT Standards and recommendations. In addition, these settings should be integrated into the information management tools under development. The findings and lessons learnt on the specialised care teams have been essential and aligned with the 2030 EMT strategy. Major investments are needed to ensure that more specialised care teams are efficient and effective even in future responses, especially for healthcare facilities that are inadequately capacitated, which would eventually allow local workforce growth and strengthen technical skills through their collaborations in training and collaborative responses. Further, they would guide future fast delivery of surgical equipment and burns treatment kits.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00649-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An explosion at a fuel depot in the region of Berkadzor, around 6 km near Stepanakert in Nagorno-Karabakh, happened on September 25, 2023 resulting in more than 220 lost lives and around 300 injuries. The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia (MoH), collaborating with the WHO, requested assistance for burn specialised care teams and medical evacuation.

Study objectives: To describe the emergency response learnings by reflecting on Armenia's experience managing the incident and the international EMTs' role in responding to it.

Methods: This was an observational study whose data was compiled through a triangulation of data obtained from the EMT teams using information management tools, including an EMT Minimum Data Set (MDS) specifically designed for coordinating burns responses in a daily reporting format and others from the MoH and medical evacuation (Medevac) teams, together with the information and analysis from field coordination meetings and deliberation with MoH.

Results: Four international EMTs (I-EMTs) were deployed to Armenia in coordination with the MoH and WHO. They were well-prepared and self-sufficient, but the response highlighted the need for standardized protocols for Medevac and burns care. Nearly half of the patients were critical on the first day, with 58% in non-ICU centers and 42% in ICU, with 20 patients medically evacuated using draft Medevac guidelines. Severely burned patients in non-ICU units received 24-hour care from intensive care specialists. However, the shortage of ICU and specialized burns beds in Armenian hospitals was evident. The Emergency Medical Teams Coordination Cell (EMTCC) team effectively used information management tools to collect, process, analyze, and disseminate data to the MoH and response teams, facilitating rapid deployment and decision-making. The EMTs collaborated with local hospital staff, ensuring coordination with MoH and hospital management for follow-up and supply delivery. This integrated approach built local capacity, developed essential rehabilitation modules for burned patients, and delivered burn kits and surgical equipment. Early international assistance, coordinated by WHO and MoH, facilitated a rapid response, early EMT CC installation, and improved communication, ensuring the delivery of essential burn kits.

Conclusion: There is a need to set standards for elements such as Medevac and burns care through the WHO EMT Standards and recommendations. In addition, these settings should be integrated into the information management tools under development. The findings and lessons learnt on the specialised care teams have been essential and aligned with the 2030 EMT strategy. Major investments are needed to ensure that more specialised care teams are efficient and effective even in future responses, especially for healthcare facilities that are inadequately capacitated, which would eventually allow local workforce growth and strengthen technical skills through their collaborations in training and collaborative responses. Further, they would guide future fast delivery of surgical equipment and burns treatment kits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:2023 年 9 月 25 日,纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫斯捷潘纳克特附近约 6 公里处的贝尔卡 佐尔地区一个燃料库发生爆炸,造成 220 多人丧生,约 300 人受伤。亚美尼亚共和国卫生部(MoH)与世界卫生组织合作,请求为烧伤专业护理小组和医疗后送提供援助:研究目的:通过反思亚美尼亚处理该事件的经验和国际急救人员在应对该事件中所扮演的角色,描述应急响应的经验教训:这是一项观察性研究,其数据是通过使用信息管理工具从急救医疗队获得的数据(包括急救医疗队最低数据集(MDS),该数据集专门用于以每日报告的形式协调烧伤应对措施)、卫生部和医疗后送(Medevac)队提供的其他数据,以及现场协调会议和与卫生部商议后获得的信息和分析进行三角分析后编制而成的:与卫生部和世卫组织协调,向亚美尼亚部署了四名国际急救医疗人员(I-EMTs)。他们准备充分、自给自足,但救灾工作突出表明,需要制定标准化的医疗后送和烧伤护理规程。第一天就有近一半的病人情况危急,其中 58%在非重症监护中心,42%在重症监护室,有 20 名病人使用医疗后送准则草案进行了医疗后送。在非重症监护室的严重烧伤病人得到了重症监护专家的 24 小时护理。然而,亚美尼亚医院的重症监护室和烧伤专科病床明显不足。紧急医疗队协调小组(EMTCC)团队有效地利用信息管理工具收集、处理、分析数据,并将数据传播给卫生部和应急小组,从而促进了快速部署和决策。紧急医疗小组与当地医院工作人员合作,确保与卫生部和医院管理层协调后续行动和供应。这种综合方法培养了当地的能力,为烧伤病人开发了基本的康复模块,并提供了烧伤包和手术设备。在世界卫生组织和卫生部的协调下,早期国际援助促进了快速反应、EMT CC 的早期安装以及沟通的改善,确保了基本烧伤包的交付:结论:有必要通过世界卫生组织紧急医疗救护标准和建议,为医疗后送和烧伤护理等要素制定标准。此外,这些设置应纳入正在开发的信息管理工具。关于专业护理团队的研究结果和经验教训至关重要,并与 2030 年 EMT 战略保持一致。需要进行大量投资,以确保更多的专业护理团队在未来的应对行动中高效、有效,特别是对于能力不足的医疗机构而言,这将最终促进当地劳动力的增长,并通过他们在培训和协作应对行动中的合作来加强技术技能。此外,它们还将为今后快速提供手术设备和烧伤治疗包提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
期刊最新文献
A review of the response and the emergency medical teams (EMTs) deployment in Armenia following an explosion at a fuel depot near Stepanakert (Nagorno-Karabakh)/ in Armenia. The development of a caregiver intervention to address child mental health in settings of complex humanitarian emergency: a multi-phase, multi-method approach. Self-managed abortion as a humanitarian revolution: accounts of a telehealth pilot in the Middle East. Realising health justice in Palestine: beyond humanitarian voices. A descriptive analysis of a medical humanitarian aid initiative for quality perinatal management in war-torn Ukraine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1