Developing a Competency Assessment Index System for Hematology Nurses in China: Delphi Study Insights.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Clinical Nurse Specialist Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000880
Baohui Xu, Daoqin Gu, Yun Wu, Meijuan Tu, Li Sun, Fengxia Li, Chengwen Hu
{"title":"Developing a Competency Assessment Index System for Hematology Nurses in China: Delphi Study Insights.","authors":"Baohui Xu, Daoqin Gu, Yun Wu, Meijuan Tu, Li Sun, Fengxia Li, Chengwen Hu","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient management, care, and education are influenced by the core competencies of hematology nurses. Nurse specialists enhance patient safety and nursing care quality. However, no study has constructed an index of core competence assessment for hematology nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this study, a literature review, theoretical analysis, and group discussion were performed to construct the core competency evaluation index system for hematology nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six experts from 7 provinces and cities across China were selected by purposive sampling for 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultation, and the indicators were selected based on the mean importance score >3.5 and coefficient of variation <0.25. A precedence chart determined the indicator weights at all levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation index included 6 primary, 18 secondary, and 70 tertiary indicators. The positive coefficients of the questionnaire on the 2 rounds were 100% and 92.86%. The Kendall's harmony coefficients for indicators at all levels were 0.176 to 0.461 and 0.197 to 0.220. Experts' familiarity, judgment, and authority coefficients were 0.892, 0.871, and 0.882, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation index system may provide references for the training, curriculum setting, assessment, and qualification certification of hematology nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":55249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","volume":"39 2","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patient management, care, and education are influenced by the core competencies of hematology nurses. Nurse specialists enhance patient safety and nursing care quality. However, no study has constructed an index of core competence assessment for hematology nurses.

Design: In this study, a literature review, theoretical analysis, and group discussion were performed to construct the core competency evaluation index system for hematology nurses.

Methods: Twenty-six experts from 7 provinces and cities across China were selected by purposive sampling for 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultation, and the indicators were selected based on the mean importance score >3.5 and coefficient of variation <0.25. A precedence chart determined the indicator weights at all levels.

Results: The evaluation index included 6 primary, 18 secondary, and 70 tertiary indicators. The positive coefficients of the questionnaire on the 2 rounds were 100% and 92.86%. The Kendall's harmony coefficients for indicators at all levels were 0.176 to 0.461 and 0.197 to 0.220. Experts' familiarity, judgment, and authority coefficients were 0.892, 0.871, and 0.882, respectively.

Conclusions: The evaluation index system may provide references for the training, curriculum setting, assessment, and qualification certification of hematology nurses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立中国血液科护士能力评价指标体系:德尔菲研究的启示。
目的:血液科护士核心能力对患者管理、护理和教育的影响。护理专家提高病人的安全和护理质量。然而,目前尚无研究构建血液科护士核心能力评价指标。设计:本研究采用文献综述、理论分析、小组讨论等方法构建血液科护士核心能力评价指标体系。方法:采用有目的抽样的方法,从全国7个省市抽取26名专家进行2轮德尔菲专家咨询,根据平均重要度评分>3.5和变异系数进行指标选择。结果:评价指标包括6个一级指标、18个二级指标和70个三级指标。两轮问卷的正系数分别为100%和92.86%。各级指标的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.176 ~ 0.461和0.197 ~ 0.220。专家的熟悉度系数为0.892,判断力系数为0.871,权威系数为0.882。结论:评价指标体系可为血液科护士的培训、课程设置、考核及资格认定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Clinical Nurse Specialist™: The International Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice is to disseminate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice, to foster continued development o fthe clinical nurse specialist role, and to highlight clinical nurse specialist contributions to advancing nursing practice and health policy globally. Objectives of the journal are: 1. Disseminate knowledge about clinical nurse specialist competencies and the education and regulation of practice; 2. Communicate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice on quality, safety, and cost of nursing and health services across the continuum of care; 3. Promote evidence-based practice and innovation in the transformation of nursing and health policy for the betterment of the public welfare; 4. Foster intra-professional and interdisciplinary dialogue addressing nursing and health services for specialty populations in diverse care settings adn cultures.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Nurse-Implemented Early Mobilization on Mechanically Ventilated Patient Outcomes. An Overview of California's Assembly Bill 1204 (AB 1204): Health Equity. A Possible New Licensed Practitioner: The Autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) Prescriber. Implications of Healthy Technology Act of 2025. Bringing the Clinical Nurse Specialist Voice to the Policy Table: Lessons in Advocacy and Engagement. A Possible New Licensed Practitioner: The Autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) Prescriber.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1