A modified systematic review of the impact of cultural beliefs on the acceptability and accessibility of adult palliative care in Tanzania.

Amelia Breese, Maria Clark, Lesley Halliday
{"title":"A modified systematic review of the impact of cultural beliefs on the acceptability and accessibility of adult palliative care in Tanzania.","authors":"Amelia Breese, Maria Clark, Lesley Halliday","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) is recognised by the United Nations as a crucial element of universal health coverage. This article explores the cultural beliefs around the acceptability and accessibility of PC in Tanzania, East Africa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide insight into barriers for the provision of culturally safe PC in this region.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative studies researching adult perspectives on PC in Tanzania between 2010 and 2022 were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 153 studies identified in the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: acceptability of PC for recipients; acceptability of PC for providers; accessibility of PC for recipients and accessibility of PC for providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultural beliefs around the acceptability of PC included shared values for individuals at the end of life and challenges around breaking bad news. Barriers to the accessibility of PC included training opportunities and opioid availability. Further research prioritising 'cultural safety' is necessary to improve PC provision in Tanzania.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"31 2","pages":"68-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care (PC) is recognised by the United Nations as a crucial element of universal health coverage. This article explores the cultural beliefs around the acceptability and accessibility of PC in Tanzania, East Africa.

Aim: To provide insight into barriers for the provision of culturally safe PC in this region.

Method: Qualitative studies researching adult perspectives on PC in Tanzania between 2010 and 2022 were critically appraised.

Findings: Of 153 studies identified in the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: acceptability of PC for recipients; acceptability of PC for providers; accessibility of PC for recipients and accessibility of PC for providers.

Conclusion: Cultural beliefs around the acceptability of PC included shared values for individuals at the end of life and challenges around breaking bad news. Barriers to the accessibility of PC included training opportunities and opioid availability. Further research prioritising 'cultural safety' is necessary to improve PC provision in Tanzania.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A modified systematic review of the impact of cultural beliefs on the acceptability and accessibility of adult palliative care in Tanzania. Assessment of nurses' approaches to palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care and high-dependency unit. Decisions in end-of-life care: perspectives from family caregivers. Exploring the viability of telehealth integration into specialised paediatric palliative care. Global equality, complicated systems and assisted death in palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1