Head-to-head evaluation of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR in sarcoma patients

Abstract

Purpose

Tumor-associated neovasculature and energy metabolism reprogramming serve as critical indicators of tumor proliferation, progression, invasion, and metastasis. This study conducted a head-to-head clinical investigation and comparison of [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 PET by reflecting neovasculature and glucose metabolism in sarcoma patients, respectively.

Methods

We reviewed the imaging data of sarcoma patients who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT from June 29, 2022, to December 21, 2023. The two imaging modalities were performed on two separate days within one week of each other. A cohort of 21 patients with an average age of 45.81 ± 19.99 years were enrolled. The location, number and PET characteristics of all lesions were collected. The relationships between the two tracers were evaluated.

Results

Among the 21 patients, 4 underwent imaging for initial disease staging, while the remaining 17 were imaged to detect recurrences. Patient-based analysis revealed that [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR diagnostic performance was equivalent to [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in lesion detection (P = 1.0). The SUVmax value of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 (4.64 ± 1.90) was significantly lower than that of [¹⁸F]FDG (9.43 ± 6.17, P = 0.002) across all patients. In terms of lesion-based analysis, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 identified two additional lesions compared to [¹⁸F]FDG, though this difference was not statistically significant (94 vs. 92, P = 0.678). The SUVmax value for all lesions with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 (3.47 ± 1.68) was also lower than that with [¹⁸F]FDG (5.82 ± 4.81, P = 0.003). Notably, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 was preferred in patients receiving hematopoietic cytokines.

Conclusion

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-HX01 PET offers comparable diagnostic efficacy to [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in sarcoma, with potential advantages in specific clinical scenarios. Larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT05490849 and NCT06416774.