Impact of myocardial scar burden on microvascular resistance reserve in patients with coronary artery disease

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07112-6
Masahiro Hoshino, Roel Hoek, Ruurt. A. Jukema, Jorge Dahdal, Pepijn van Diemen, Luuk H. G. A. Hopman, Pieter Raijmakers, Roel Driessen, Jos Twisk, Ibrahim Danad, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Juhani Knuuti, Paul Knaapen
{"title":"Impact of myocardial scar burden on microvascular resistance reserve in patients with coronary artery disease","authors":"Masahiro Hoshino, Roel Hoek, Ruurt. A. Jukema, Jorge Dahdal, Pepijn van Diemen, Luuk H. G. A. Hopman, Pieter Raijmakers, Roel Driessen, Jos Twisk, Ibrahim Danad, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Juhani Knuuti, Paul Knaapen","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07112-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The impact of myocardial scar on coronary microcirculation is not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the association between microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) and scar tissue.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC 2 trial, symptomatic patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent [<sup>15</sup>O]H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and fractional flow reserve (FFR). MRR was assessed utilizing PET-derived coronary flow reserve and FFR measurements. Scar quantification was assessed by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Vessel LGE burden was defined as the scar tissue proportion in each myocardial territory. Total LGE burden was defined as the proportion of overall scar.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The study included 154 patients with 397 vessels with a mean MRR of 3.56 ± 1.24. Patients with any scar tissues (LGE &gt; 0%) exhibited a lower MRR in every myocardial territory than those without scar tissues. After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, either vessel LGE burden (β =-0.013, <i>P</i> = 0.006) or total LGE burden (β =-0.039, <i>P</i> = 0.002) independently predicted a reduced MRR. Compared to myocardial territories without scar tissues (LGE burdens = 0%), MRR was significantly lower in myocardial territories with vessel LGE burden = 0% + total LGE burden &gt; 0%, and in myocardial territories with both LGE burdens &gt; 0%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Scar burden was negatively associated with MRR in patients with prior MI and/or PCI. Our findings indicate that both the proportion of myocardial scar in the vascular territory and the overall myocardial scar affect the microcirculation of individual vascular territories.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Clinical trial number</h3><p>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07112-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of myocardial scar on coronary microcirculation is not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the association between microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) and scar tissue.

Methods

In this post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC 2 trial, symptomatic patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and fractional flow reserve (FFR). MRR was assessed utilizing PET-derived coronary flow reserve and FFR measurements. Scar quantification was assessed by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Vessel LGE burden was defined as the scar tissue proportion in each myocardial territory. Total LGE burden was defined as the proportion of overall scar.

Results

The study included 154 patients with 397 vessels with a mean MRR of 3.56 ± 1.24. Patients with any scar tissues (LGE > 0%) exhibited a lower MRR in every myocardial territory than those without scar tissues. After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, either vessel LGE burden (β =-0.013, P = 0.006) or total LGE burden (β =-0.039, P = 0.002) independently predicted a reduced MRR. Compared to myocardial territories without scar tissues (LGE burdens = 0%), MRR was significantly lower in myocardial territories with vessel LGE burden = 0% + total LGE burden > 0%, and in myocardial territories with both LGE burdens > 0%.

Conclusion

Scar burden was negatively associated with MRR in patients with prior MI and/or PCI. Our findings indicate that both the proportion of myocardial scar in the vascular territory and the overall myocardial scar affect the microcirculation of individual vascular territories.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌瘢痕负荷对冠心病患者微血管阻力储备的影响
目的心肌瘢痕对冠状动脉微循环的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估微血管阻力储备(MRR)与疤痕组织的关系。方法在对pacific2试验的事后分析中,有症状的既往心肌梗死(MI)和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者接受了[15O]H2O正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、心脏磁共振(CMR)成像和分数血流储备(FFR)。利用pet衍生的冠状动脉血流储备和FFR测量来评估MRR。通过CMR晚期钆增强(LGE)评估疤痕量化。血管LGE负荷定义为疤痕组织在各心肌区域的比例。LGE总负担定义为疤痕占总疤痕的比例。结果154例患者397支血管,MRR平均值为3.56±1.24。有任何疤痕组织的患者(LGE为0%)在各心肌区域的MRR均低于无疤痕组织的患者。在调整心血管危险因素后,血管LGE负荷(β =-0.013, P = 0.006)或总LGE负荷(β =-0.039, P = 0.002)独立预测MRR降低。与无瘢痕组织心肌区域(LGE负荷= 0%)相比,血管LGE负荷= 0% +总LGE负荷>; 0%的心肌区域,以及同时有LGE负荷>; 0%的心肌区域,MRR显著降低。结论既往心肌梗死和/或PCI患者的疤痕负担与MRR呈负相关。我们的研究结果表明,心肌疤痕在血管区域的比例和整体心肌疤痕都会影响单个血管区域的微循环。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
coPERCIST: AI-assisted PET-CT response assessment. An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Value of a repeat 18F-flotufolastat PET scan following a negative scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy The confounding effects of microvascular physiology on the uptake and diagnostic accuracy of [18F]fluoroethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography in gliomas SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland results of the 2nd joint survey 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1