Did the energy transition effectively alleviate multidimensional stresses of the social system? An evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Chinese cities

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106225
Zengchuan Wang , Yanling Xi , Li Li , Yalin Lei , Sanmang Wu , Yanfang Cui , Jiabin Chen
{"title":"Did the energy transition effectively alleviate multidimensional stresses of the social system? An evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Chinese cities","authors":"Zengchuan Wang ,&nbsp;Yanling Xi ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Yalin Lei ,&nbsp;Sanmang Wu ,&nbsp;Yanfang Cui ,&nbsp;Jiabin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the urgent demand for global climate governance, energy transition, as a core strategy, had garnered significant attention for its societal impacts. Existing literature primarily focused on the economic and environmental ramifications, while inadequate exploration of its societal implications and incomplete mechanism testing persisted. Based on panel data of 256 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2021, the propensity score matching-difference in difference method was employed to comprehensively examine the multifaceted effects of energy transition on employment, public health and urban-rural income disparities in social systems. The moderation effect model was utilized to verify the moderating roles of resource endowments and technological innovation. Lastly, the spatial spillover effects and regional heterogeneity of impacts were analyzed. The findings indicate that: (1) Energy transition significantly contributed to optimizing employment structures, improving public health, and narrowing urban-rural income gaps. (2) Policy effects were modulated by resource endowments and technological innovation. (3) The influence of energy transition exhibited varying degrees of spatial spillovers across cities with different geographical distances. Additionally, the impacts of energy transition demonstrated regional heterogeneity. It offered a new perspective for understanding the societal effects of energy transition. Recommendations were proposed based on the conclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 106225"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725001027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the urgent demand for global climate governance, energy transition, as a core strategy, had garnered significant attention for its societal impacts. Existing literature primarily focused on the economic and environmental ramifications, while inadequate exploration of its societal implications and incomplete mechanism testing persisted. Based on panel data of 256 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2021, the propensity score matching-difference in difference method was employed to comprehensively examine the multifaceted effects of energy transition on employment, public health and urban-rural income disparities in social systems. The moderation effect model was utilized to verify the moderating roles of resource endowments and technological innovation. Lastly, the spatial spillover effects and regional heterogeneity of impacts were analyzed. The findings indicate that: (1) Energy transition significantly contributed to optimizing employment structures, improving public health, and narrowing urban-rural income gaps. (2) Policy effects were modulated by resource endowments and technological innovation. (3) The influence of energy transition exhibited varying degrees of spatial spillovers across cities with different geographical distances. Additionally, the impacts of energy transition demonstrated regional heterogeneity. It offered a new perspective for understanding the societal effects of energy transition. Recommendations were proposed based on the conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源转型是否有效地缓解了社会系统的多维压力?来自中国城市准自然实验的证据
在全球气候治理的迫切需求下,能源转型作为一项核心战略,其社会影响备受关注。现有文献主要关注经济和环境影响,而对其社会影响的探索不足和不完整的机制测试仍然存在。基于2010 - 2021年中国256个城市的面板数据,采用差异法中的倾向得分匹配-差异,综合考察了能源转型对就业、公共卫生和城乡收入差距的多方面影响。利用调节效应模型验证了资源禀赋和技术创新的调节作用。最后,分析了空间溢出效应和影响的区域异质性。研究结果表明:(1)能源转型对优化就业结构、改善公共健康、缩小城乡收入差距有显著促进作用。(2)政策效应受资源禀赋和技术创新的调节。③能源转移的影响在不同地理距离的城市间表现出不同程度的空间溢出效应。此外,能源转移的影响表现出区域异质性。它为理解能源转型的社会影响提供了一个新的视角。根据这些结论提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
Revealing the impact of multi-scale innovation networks on urban carbon emission intensity: Evidence from Chinese cities Mapping geosystem services potential for urban climate resilience: A case study from Malmö, Sweden Beat the heat: Hotspots for nature-based solutions in Vienna and Budapest Urban resilience through nature-based solutions in an era of environmental extremes: A global systematic analysis Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban flood resilience in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1