Place-based access to integrated mental health services within substance use disorder treatment facilities in the US

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117843
George Pro , Harold W. Neighbors , Brittany Wilkerson , Tiffany Haynes
{"title":"Place-based access to integrated mental health services within substance use disorder treatment facilities in the US","authors":"George Pro ,&nbsp;Harold W. Neighbors ,&nbsp;Brittany Wilkerson ,&nbsp;Tiffany Haynes","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The co-occurrence of substance use (SUD) and mental disorders is increasing in the US. Integrating mental health services into SUD treatment facilities improves treatment retention and success, but access to integrated services is lagging behind growing demand. The purpose of this study was to map the locations of SUD treatment facilities that offer integrated mental health services and identify community characteristics associated with whether a treatment facility offers more comprehensive integrated services. We used the Mental health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository to identify the location and characteristics of licensed outpatient SUD treatment facilities in the US (2022; N = 8,858). Our focal predictors included the percentage of a census block group that was White, Black, and Hispanic. We used multilevel multiple logistic regression to model whether a facility offered integrated mental health (y/n), adjusted for relevant facility-, county-, and state-level covariates, and defined state as a random effect. The majority of integrated facilities were located in the eastern US, with notable concentrations around large metropolitan areas of Minneapolis, MN, Chicago, IL, Atlanta, GA, and New York, NY. For every 10-percentage point increase in a census block group's Black and Hispanic population, there was a 5% and 7% decrease in the odds of offering integrated services, respectively (aOR<sub>Black</sub> = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91–0.99, p = 0.04; aOR<sub>Hispanic</sub> = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.90–0.96, p &lt; 0.0001). We frame our findings around social conditions as fundamental drivers of disease and healthcare access and acknowledge the country's historical disinvestment in nonwhite and rural communities. Racially targeted programs are needed to effectively address growing racial and ethnic inequities in SUD and mental healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"369 ","pages":"Article 117843"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The co-occurrence of substance use (SUD) and mental disorders is increasing in the US. Integrating mental health services into SUD treatment facilities improves treatment retention and success, but access to integrated services is lagging behind growing demand. The purpose of this study was to map the locations of SUD treatment facilities that offer integrated mental health services and identify community characteristics associated with whether a treatment facility offers more comprehensive integrated services. We used the Mental health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository to identify the location and characteristics of licensed outpatient SUD treatment facilities in the US (2022; N = 8,858). Our focal predictors included the percentage of a census block group that was White, Black, and Hispanic. We used multilevel multiple logistic regression to model whether a facility offered integrated mental health (y/n), adjusted for relevant facility-, county-, and state-level covariates, and defined state as a random effect. The majority of integrated facilities were located in the eastern US, with notable concentrations around large metropolitan areas of Minneapolis, MN, Chicago, IL, Atlanta, GA, and New York, NY. For every 10-percentage point increase in a census block group's Black and Hispanic population, there was a 5% and 7% decrease in the odds of offering integrated services, respectively (aORBlack = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91–0.99, p = 0.04; aORHispanic = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.90–0.96, p < 0.0001). We frame our findings around social conditions as fundamental drivers of disease and healthcare access and acknowledge the country's historical disinvestment in nonwhite and rural communities. Racially targeted programs are needed to effectively address growing racial and ethnic inequities in SUD and mental healthcare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国物质使用障碍治疗机构中获得综合精神卫生服务的基于地点的机会
在美国,药物使用(SUD)和精神障碍的共同发生正在增加。将精神卫生服务纳入SUD治疗设施可提高治疗的保存性和成功率,但获得综合服务的机会落后于不断增长的需求。本研究的目的是绘制提供综合心理健康服务的SUD治疗设施的位置,并确定与治疗设施是否提供更全面的综合服务相关的社区特征。我们使用心理健康和成瘾治疗跟踪库来确定美国许可的门诊SUD治疗设施的位置和特征(2022;n = 8,858)。我们的重点预测指标包括白人、黑人和西班牙裔人口普查群体的百分比。我们使用多水平多元逻辑回归来模拟一个机构是否提供综合心理健康(y/n),调整了相关的机构、县和州的协变量,并将状态定义为随机效应。大多数综合设施位于美国东部,主要集中在明尼阿波利斯,MN,芝加哥,IL,亚特兰大,GA和纽约等大都市地区。人口普查区的黑人和西班牙裔人口每增加10个百分点,提供综合服务的几率分别下降5%和7% (aORBlack = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p = 0.04;orhispanic = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.90-0.96, p <;0.0001)。我们的研究结果围绕着社会条件作为疾病和医疗保健获取的基本驱动因素,并承认该国在非白人和农村社区的历史投资减少。需要针对种族的项目来有效解决SUD和精神保健中日益增长的种族和民族不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1