Real-Life Impact of Enfortumab Vedotin or Chemotherapy in the Sequential Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: The ARON-2 Retrospective Experience
Mimma Rizzo, Franco Morelli, Yüksel Ürün, Sebastiano Buti, Se Hoon Park, Maria T. Bourlon, Enrique Grande, Francesco Massari, Johannes Landmesser, Alexandr Poprach, Hideki Takeshita, Giandomenico Roviello, Zin W. Myint, Lazar Popovic, Andrey Soares, Halima Abahssain, Patrizia Giannatempo, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Lorena Incorvaia, Samer Salah, Annalisa Zeppellini, Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro, Camillo Porta, Shilpa Gupta, Matteo Santoni
{"title":"Real-Life Impact of Enfortumab Vedotin or Chemotherapy in the Sequential Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: The ARON-2 Retrospective Experience","authors":"Mimma Rizzo, Franco Morelli, Yüksel Ürün, Sebastiano Buti, Se Hoon Park, Maria T. Bourlon, Enrique Grande, Francesco Massari, Johannes Landmesser, Alexandr Poprach, Hideki Takeshita, Giandomenico Roviello, Zin W. Myint, Lazar Popovic, Andrey Soares, Halima Abahssain, Patrizia Giannatempo, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Lorena Incorvaia, Samer Salah, Annalisa Zeppellini, Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro, Camillo Porta, Shilpa Gupta, Matteo Santoni","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recently, a plethora of novel systemic agents have been incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). The antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), enfortumab vedotin (EV), has demonstrated relevant clinical benefit in patients with aUC refractory to platinum and immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Our study provides a retrospective, international, real-world analysis comparing the effectiveness of EV to chemotherapy in this setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data were extracted from the medical records of patients treated with EV or chemotherapy following pembrolizumab for recurrent or progressive aUC after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis included 247 patients treated with EV (88, 36%) or chemotherapy (159, 64%). Median OS was 9.1 months (95%CI 7.2–10.7) in the overall study population, 13.6 months (95%CI 10.0–31.0) in patients receiving EV and 6.8 months (95%CI 6.0–8.9) in patients receiving chemotherapy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The OS benefit of EV was not affected by primary tumour site and histology, metastatic sites, type of first platinum-based chemotherapy or response to pembrolizumab. In the EV cohort, the median PFS was significantly longer (8.8 months [95%CI 6.5–17.0] vs. 3.0 months [95%CI 2.6–3.7]) and the ORR was significantly higher (56% vs. 23%) than in the chemotherapy cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results of our international analysis of real-world data confirm the effectiveness of EV in the sequential strategy of aUC patients who have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab, regardless of commonly considered prognostic factors.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05290038</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Recently, a plethora of novel systemic agents have been incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). The antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), enfortumab vedotin (EV), has demonstrated relevant clinical benefit in patients with aUC refractory to platinum and immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Our study provides a retrospective, international, real-world analysis comparing the effectiveness of EV to chemotherapy in this setting.
Methods
The data were extracted from the medical records of patients treated with EV or chemotherapy following pembrolizumab for recurrent or progressive aUC after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR).
Results
Our analysis included 247 patients treated with EV (88, 36%) or chemotherapy (159, 64%). Median OS was 9.1 months (95%CI 7.2–10.7) in the overall study population, 13.6 months (95%CI 10.0–31.0) in patients receiving EV and 6.8 months (95%CI 6.0–8.9) in patients receiving chemotherapy (p < 0.001). The OS benefit of EV was not affected by primary tumour site and histology, metastatic sites, type of first platinum-based chemotherapy or response to pembrolizumab. In the EV cohort, the median PFS was significantly longer (8.8 months [95%CI 6.5–17.0] vs. 3.0 months [95%CI 2.6–3.7]) and the ORR was significantly higher (56% vs. 23%) than in the chemotherapy cohort.
Conclusions
The results of our international analysis of real-world data confirm the effectiveness of EV in the sequential strategy of aUC patients who have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab, regardless of commonly considered prognostic factors.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.