Barry Maguire, Alison DeMaio, Aoife O'Neill, Cillian Clancy
{"title":"A quality-of-life meta-analysis comparing pre- and postoperative symptoms in women undergoing colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis","authors":"Barry Maguire, Alison DeMaio, Aoife O'Neill, Cillian Clancy","doi":"10.1111/codi.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) may involve the rectum or colon and is associated with pain, gastrointestinal dysfunction and reduced quality of life (QoL). While hormonal treatment may be effective, surgical intervention including colorectal resection can be required. Colorectal resection can result in functional changes and complications, which can also impair QoL. The aim of this study is to examine all available comparative pre- and postoperative data on QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>An electronic database search was conducted for studies reporting pre- and postoperative QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data were combined using random-effects models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen studies including 1142 patients were included. Colorectal resection was associated with improved outcomes for all items in the SF-36 QoL questionnaire as well as symptom outcomes including dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia. Importantly, the gastrointestinal QoL index was significantly improved (mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 15.93–33.08, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) as was dyschezia (mean difference −4.1, 95% CI −4.77 to −3.42, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). There was no change in low anterior resection syndrome scores (mean difference −5.28, 95% CI −11.65 to 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.1046).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates a significant postoperative improvement in patient-reported QoL, pain symptoms and gastrointestinal function following colorectal resection for endometriosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) may involve the rectum or colon and is associated with pain, gastrointestinal dysfunction and reduced quality of life (QoL). While hormonal treatment may be effective, surgical intervention including colorectal resection can be required. Colorectal resection can result in functional changes and complications, which can also impair QoL. The aim of this study is to examine all available comparative pre- and postoperative data on QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE.
Method
An electronic database search was conducted for studies reporting pre- and postoperative QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data were combined using random-effects models.
Results
Fourteen studies including 1142 patients were included. Colorectal resection was associated with improved outcomes for all items in the SF-36 QoL questionnaire as well as symptom outcomes including dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia. Importantly, the gastrointestinal QoL index was significantly improved (mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 15.93–33.08, p < 0.0001) as was dyschezia (mean difference −4.1, 95% CI −4.77 to −3.42, p < 0.0001). There was no change in low anterior resection syndrome scores (mean difference −5.28, 95% CI −11.65 to 1.10, p = 0.1046).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates a significant postoperative improvement in patient-reported QoL, pain symptoms and gastrointestinal function following colorectal resection for endometriosis.
目的深度浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE)可能累及直肠或结肠,并伴有疼痛、胃肠功能障碍和生活质量下降。虽然激素治疗可能有效,但可能需要手术干预,包括结肠直肠切除术。结直肠切除术可导致功能改变和并发症,这也会影响患者的生活质量。本研究的目的是检查所有可获得的结肠直肠切除术后死亡患者生活质量和症状结果的术前和术后比较数据。方法通过电子数据库检索有关结直肠切除术后死亡患者术前、术后生活质量和症状结果的研究。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,并遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。使用随机效应模型合并数据。结果纳入14项研究,1142例患者。结直肠切除术与SF-36生活质量问卷中所有项目的改善结果以及包括痛经、慢性盆腔疼痛和深度性交困难在内的症状结果相关。重要的是,胃肠道生活质量指数显著改善(平均差异24.50,95% CI 15.93-33.08, p < 0.0001),精神障碍也显著改善(平均差异- 4.1,95% CI - 4.77 - 3.42, p < 0.0001)。低前切除术综合征评分无变化(平均差异为- 5.28,95% CI为- 11.65至1.10,p = 0.1046)。结论本研究表明,子宫内膜异位症结直肠切除术后患者报告的生活质量、疼痛症状和胃肠道功能均有显著改善。
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate.
Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases.
Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies.
Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.