A simple method based on qualitative MRI features for characterizing clear cell renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses: comparison with the clear cell likelihood score.
Mengqiu Cui, Xueyi Ning, Huiping Guo, Yuanhao Ma, Honghao Xu, Xu Bai, Xiaohui Ding, Jiahui Jiang, He Wang, Dawei Yang, Lin Li, Huiyi Ye, Haiyi Wang
{"title":"A simple method based on qualitative MRI features for characterizing clear cell renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses: comparison with the clear cell likelihood score.","authors":"Mengqiu Cui, Xueyi Ning, Huiping Guo, Yuanhao Ma, Honghao Xu, Xu Bai, Xiaohui Ding, Jiahui Jiang, He Wang, Dawei Yang, Lin Li, Huiyi Ye, Haiyi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04844-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a simple method based on qualitative MRI features for characterizing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in small renal masses (SRMs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included pathologically confirmed SRM patients who underwent multiparametric MRI between March 2017 and November 2023 at three institutions. Univariable logistic regression and Fleiss κ coefficient were employed to determine features with significant diagnostic value and high consistency for ccRCC. A simple method was developed based on the selected features using multivariable logistic regression. The performance of the method was compared with the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) using DeLong test and McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 SRMs from 194 patients (116 men; median age: 54 years) were included. Intense corticomedullary enhancement, microscopic fat, and pseudocapsule were selected to construct the simple method, which considered a mass to be ccRCC if any two of the aforementioned three signs were present. Compared with ccLS, our method demonstrated similar sensitivity (0.824 versus 0.725, P = 0.227) and specificity (0.840 versus 0.860, P > 0.999). The AUC for the simple method and ccLS was 0.832 (95% CI 0.744, 0.899) and 0.793 (95% CI 0.701, 0.867), respectively (P = 0.864). For ccRCC cases assigned a score of 1 to 3 by the ccLS, 57.1% (8/14) were diagnosed correctly by the simple method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simple method can accurately characterize ccRCC in SRM with comparable efficacy to ccLS. Atypical ccRCC scored 1 to 3 by ccLS may benefit from the method.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04844-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a simple method based on qualitative MRI features for characterizing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in small renal masses (SRMs).
Materials and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included pathologically confirmed SRM patients who underwent multiparametric MRI between March 2017 and November 2023 at three institutions. Univariable logistic regression and Fleiss κ coefficient were employed to determine features with significant diagnostic value and high consistency for ccRCC. A simple method was developed based on the selected features using multivariable logistic regression. The performance of the method was compared with the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) using DeLong test and McNemar test.
Results: A total of 200 SRMs from 194 patients (116 men; median age: 54 years) were included. Intense corticomedullary enhancement, microscopic fat, and pseudocapsule were selected to construct the simple method, which considered a mass to be ccRCC if any two of the aforementioned three signs were present. Compared with ccLS, our method demonstrated similar sensitivity (0.824 versus 0.725, P = 0.227) and specificity (0.840 versus 0.860, P > 0.999). The AUC for the simple method and ccLS was 0.832 (95% CI 0.744, 0.899) and 0.793 (95% CI 0.701, 0.867), respectively (P = 0.864). For ccRCC cases assigned a score of 1 to 3 by the ccLS, 57.1% (8/14) were diagnosed correctly by the simple method.
Conclusion: The simple method can accurately characterize ccRCC in SRM with comparable efficacy to ccLS. Atypical ccRCC scored 1 to 3 by ccLS may benefit from the method.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits