In vivo confocal microscopic study of cornea verticillata and limbus deposits in patients with Fabry disease.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1541510
Xuecong Zhou, Yawen Zhao, Yingsi Li, Yujing Yuan, Xiaoming Yan, Wei Zhang, Yuan Wu
{"title":"<i>In vivo</i> confocal microscopic study of cornea verticillata and limbus deposits in patients with Fabry disease.","authors":"Xuecong Zhou, Yawen Zhao, Yingsi Li, Yujing Yuan, Xiaoming Yan, Wei Zhang, Yuan Wu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1541510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to investigate the microstructure characteristics of cornea verticillata and limbus deposits in patients with Fabry disease (FD) using <i>in vivo</i> confocal microscopy (IVCM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 60 eyes from 30 patients diagnosed with FD were examined and compared with 36 eyes from 18 healthy controls in this prospective, cross-sectional, controlled, single-center study. The initial assessment of cornea verticillata (CV) was conducted using slit-lamp microscopy. Subsequently, IVCM was performed to assess deposits in the corneal and limbal epithelium. We compared the differences between the sexes (heterozygous and hemizygous) and phenotypes (classical and non-classical).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The epithelial deposit detection rate with IVCM was statistically higher (52/60, 86.67%) compared to the biomicroscopic evaluation of CV using a silt lamp (46/60, 76.67%) (<i>p</i> = 0.031). A higher prevalence of corneal epithelial deposits was observed in the classical phenotype as compared to the non-classical phenotype (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Surprisingly, cardiac variants previously lacking cornea verticillata show a high prevalence (85.71%) of corneal epithelial deposits under IVCM. The prevalence and severity of deposits, especially in limbal epithelial rete pegs, were higher in FD than in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with slit-lamp microscopy, IVCM provides a more effective tool for examining the epithelial deposits in patients with FD. Patients with FD demonstrated a profound bilateral increase in corneal epithelial deposits and limbal hyperreflective cells compared to controls, with more prominent pathological changes observed in classical phenotype individuals. The high prevalence of epithelial deposits observed through IVCM in the cardiac variant highlights the essential ability of IVCM as an effective diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1541510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1541510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the microstructure characteristics of cornea verticillata and limbus deposits in patients with Fabry disease (FD) using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

Methods: A total of 60 eyes from 30 patients diagnosed with FD were examined and compared with 36 eyes from 18 healthy controls in this prospective, cross-sectional, controlled, single-center study. The initial assessment of cornea verticillata (CV) was conducted using slit-lamp microscopy. Subsequently, IVCM was performed to assess deposits in the corneal and limbal epithelium. We compared the differences between the sexes (heterozygous and hemizygous) and phenotypes (classical and non-classical).

Results: The epithelial deposit detection rate with IVCM was statistically higher (52/60, 86.67%) compared to the biomicroscopic evaluation of CV using a silt lamp (46/60, 76.67%) (p = 0.031). A higher prevalence of corneal epithelial deposits was observed in the classical phenotype as compared to the non-classical phenotype (p = 0.023). Surprisingly, cardiac variants previously lacking cornea verticillata show a high prevalence (85.71%) of corneal epithelial deposits under IVCM. The prevalence and severity of deposits, especially in limbal epithelial rete pegs, were higher in FD than in controls (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with slit-lamp microscopy, IVCM provides a more effective tool for examining the epithelial deposits in patients with FD. Patients with FD demonstrated a profound bilateral increase in corneal epithelial deposits and limbal hyperreflective cells compared to controls, with more prominent pathological changes observed in classical phenotype individuals. The high prevalence of epithelial deposits observed through IVCM in the cardiac variant highlights the essential ability of IVCM as an effective diagnostic tool.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法布里病患者角膜屈曲和角膜缘沉积的体内共聚焦显微镜研究。
目的:利用体内共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)观察法布里病(FD)患者的角膜屈曲和角膜缘沉积物的显微结构特征。方法:在这项前瞻性、横断面、对照、单中心研究中,对30例FD患者的60只眼睛进行了检查,并与18名健康对照者的36只眼睛进行了比较。采用裂隙灯显微术对角膜屈曲(CV)进行初步评估。随后,进行IVCM以评估角膜和角膜缘上皮的沉积物。我们比较了两性(杂合子和半合子)和表型(经典型和非经典型)的差异。结果:IVCM法上皮沉积物检出率(52/60,86.67%)高于淤泥灯法生物显微评价CV (46/60, 76.67%) (p = 0.031)。与非经典表型相比,经典表型中角膜上皮沉积的患病率更高(p = 0.023)。令人惊讶的是,先前缺乏角膜的心脏变异在IVCM下显示出高患病率(85.71%)的角膜上皮沉积。结论:与裂隙灯显微镜相比,IVCM为FD患者提供了一种更有效的检查上皮沉积的工具。与对照组相比,FD患者表现出双侧角膜上皮沉积物和角膜缘高反射细胞的显著增加,在经典表型个体中观察到更显著的病理改变。通过IVCM在心脏变异体中观察到的高患病率上皮沉积突出了IVCM作为有效诊断工具的基本能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Correction: Oregon primary care providers as a frontline defense in the War on Melanoma™: improving access to melanoma education. Correction: Melanoma toolkit for early detection for primary care clinicians: a 1-year follow-up on outcomes. ED90 of intravenous remimazolam for alleviating preoperative anxiety in children: a prospective dose-finding study. Association between body mass index and prognosis in interstitial lung disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral and topical peptides for skin aging: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1