Reimbursement for Neuroma Surgery Over the Past Decade.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004297
Stephen A Stearns, Noah M Raizman, Floris V Raasveld, Vlad Tereshenko, Lisa Gfrerer, Ian L Valerio, Jonathan M Winograd, Kyle R Eberlin
{"title":"Reimbursement for Neuroma Surgery Over the Past Decade.","authors":"Stephen A Stearns, Noah M Raizman, Floris V Raasveld, Vlad Tereshenko, Lisa Gfrerer, Ian L Valerio, Jonathan M Winograd, Kyle R Eberlin","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine how Medicare physician reimbursements for operations related to symptomatic neuromas have changed over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review uses the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool to access reimbursement rates for common peripheral nerve surgeries. Six CPT codes frequently used to bill for neuroma excision, burying in muscle, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) procedures were identified as representative of the peripheral nerve operations to treat symptomatic neuromas. Physician reimbursement rates were gathered from 2014 to 2024, with gross and inflation-adjusted changes in reimbursement calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each included peripheral nerve procedure, there was a significant decrease in Medicare physician reimbursement both with and without inflation adjustments. CPT 64905 (for TMR) decreased 30%; CPT 64787 and 15769 (for intramuscular burying and RPNI) decreased 31% and 21%; and CPT 64784, 64782, and 64774 (for neuroma excision) decreased 28%, 26%, and 24%, respectively (all inflation-adjusted), with an average compound annual growth rate of -3.6%. For every 100 neuroma operations in 2014, surgeons in 2018 needed to perform an additional 5.6 to be reimbursed at equal levels. In 2024, surgeons need to perform an additional 27 operations for every 100 to be reimbursed equivalently as 5 years prior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been a consistent decrease in physician reimbursement for procedures related to symptomatic neuromas, highlighting a larger trend in Medicare payments. Continued decline in reimbursement poses risk to these important treatment modalities, which could limit surgeons' ability to provide care to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"452-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine how Medicare physician reimbursements for operations related to symptomatic neuromas have changed over the past decade.

Methods: This retrospective review uses the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool to access reimbursement rates for common peripheral nerve surgeries. Six CPT codes frequently used to bill for neuroma excision, burying in muscle, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) procedures were identified as representative of the peripheral nerve operations to treat symptomatic neuromas. Physician reimbursement rates were gathered from 2014 to 2024, with gross and inflation-adjusted changes in reimbursement calculated.

Results: For each included peripheral nerve procedure, there was a significant decrease in Medicare physician reimbursement both with and without inflation adjustments. CPT 64905 (for TMR) decreased 30%; CPT 64787 and 15769 (for intramuscular burying and RPNI) decreased 31% and 21%; and CPT 64784, 64782, and 64774 (for neuroma excision) decreased 28%, 26%, and 24%, respectively (all inflation-adjusted), with an average compound annual growth rate of -3.6%. For every 100 neuroma operations in 2014, surgeons in 2018 needed to perform an additional 5.6 to be reimbursed at equal levels. In 2024, surgeons need to perform an additional 27 operations for every 100 to be reimbursed equivalently as 5 years prior.

Conclusions: There has been a consistent decrease in physician reimbursement for procedures related to symptomatic neuromas, highlighting a larger trend in Medicare payments. Continued decline in reimbursement poses risk to these important treatment modalities, which could limit surgeons' ability to provide care to patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去十年神经瘤手术的报销情况。
目的:本研究旨在确定在过去十年中,与症状性神经瘤相关的手术的医疗保险医生报销发生了怎样的变化。方法:本回顾性研究使用医疗保险医师收费表查找工具获取常见周围神经手术的报销率。6种常用的CPT编码用于神经瘤切除、肌肉埋入、靶向肌肉神经再生(TMR)和再生周围神经界面(RPNI)手术,被确定为治疗症状性神经瘤的周围神经手术的代表。从2014年到2024年收集医生报销率,计算报销总额和通货膨胀调整后的变化。结果:对于每一个包括周围神经手术,有和没有通货膨胀调整的医疗保险医生报销显著减少。CPT 64905 (TMR)下降30%;CPT 64787和15769(肌内掩埋和RPNI)分别下降31%和21%;CPT 64784、64782和64774(用于神经瘤切除)分别下降28%、26%和24%(均经通胀调整),平均复合年增长率为-3.6%。2014年每进行100例神经瘤手术,外科医生在2018年需要额外进行5.6例手术才能获得同等水平的报销。到2024年,每100例手术中,外科医生需要多做27例手术,才能获得与5年前相当的报销。结论:对于与症状性神经瘤相关的手术,医生报销一直在下降,这突出了医疗保险支付的一个更大的趋势。持续下降的报销给这些重要的治疗方式带来了风险,这可能会限制外科医生为患者提供护理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) as an Alternative to Autologous Bone Graft in Pediatric Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Double Opposing Z-plasties to Repair a Cleft Palate: A Personal Account. Impact of Preoperative Sarcopenia on Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study. "The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery". Optimized Neurotherapy With Electrical Stimulation: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Nerve Management Procedures for Postamputation Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1