Substantial heterogeneity in trauma triage tool characteristic operationalization for identification of major trauma: a hybrid systematic review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02694-6
N A Donnelly, L Brent, P Hickey, S Masterson, C Deasy, J Moloney, M Linvill, R Zaidan, A Simpson, Frank Doyle
{"title":"Substantial heterogeneity in trauma triage tool characteristic operationalization for identification of major trauma: a hybrid systematic review.","authors":"N A Donnelly, L Brent, P Hickey, S Masterson, C Deasy, J Moloney, M Linvill, R Zaidan, A Simpson, Frank Doyle","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02694-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trauma Triage Tools (TTTs) support pre-hospital staff to identify major trauma patients based on prehospital characteristics and bring them to appropriate trauma centres. However, while triaging trauma has been examined extensively, there appears to be little consensus on how variables within TTTs are applied. We therefore aimed to examine the prehospital characteristics and their operationalization applied in the international literature in TTTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied a hybrid systematic review approach. Searches were conducted in multiple databases. We initially searched for systematic reviews that analyse prehospital characteristics applied in TTTs, then supplemented this with an updated search of original TTT papers from November 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 92 papers which identified 52 adult general population TTTs. Results indicate considerable heterogeneity in prehospital characteristics included in TTTs internationally. There was similarity in the higher-level categories included in the tools: tools often included measurements of a patient's physiological characteristics, injury characteristics, mechanism of injury and any modifiers for high-risk groups. However, the prehospital characteristics that made up those groups, how they were applied and interpreted were found to vary considerably.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is agreement in the higher-level categories used in TTTs, the thresholds adopted in specific variables vary widely, which may reflect statistical rather than clinical considerations. This may contribute to considerable variation in standards of major trauma triaging internationally. An agreed taxonomy of operationalization of prehospital characteristics used in TTTs is required to prevent sub-optimal clinical decision-making in major trauma triaging.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023393094.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02694-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trauma Triage Tools (TTTs) support pre-hospital staff to identify major trauma patients based on prehospital characteristics and bring them to appropriate trauma centres. However, while triaging trauma has been examined extensively, there appears to be little consensus on how variables within TTTs are applied. We therefore aimed to examine the prehospital characteristics and their operationalization applied in the international literature in TTTs.

Methods: We applied a hybrid systematic review approach. Searches were conducted in multiple databases. We initially searched for systematic reviews that analyse prehospital characteristics applied in TTTs, then supplemented this with an updated search of original TTT papers from November 2019.

Results: We identified 92 papers which identified 52 adult general population TTTs. Results indicate considerable heterogeneity in prehospital characteristics included in TTTs internationally. There was similarity in the higher-level categories included in the tools: tools often included measurements of a patient's physiological characteristics, injury characteristics, mechanism of injury and any modifiers for high-risk groups. However, the prehospital characteristics that made up those groups, how they were applied and interpreted were found to vary considerably.

Conclusion: While there is agreement in the higher-level categories used in TTTs, the thresholds adopted in specific variables vary widely, which may reflect statistical rather than clinical considerations. This may contribute to considerable variation in standards of major trauma triaging internationally. An agreed taxonomy of operationalization of prehospital characteristics used in TTTs is required to prevent sub-optimal clinical decision-making in major trauma triaging.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023393094.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别重大创伤的创伤分诊工具特征操作化的实质性异质性:一项混合系统综述。
目的:创伤分诊工具(ttt)支持院前工作人员根据院前特征识别重大创伤患者,并将其带到适当的创伤中心。然而,虽然对创伤分诊进行了广泛的研究,但对ttt中的变量如何应用似乎没有达成共识。因此,我们旨在研究院前特征及其在ttt国际文献中的应用。方法:采用混合系统评价方法。在多个数据库中进行了搜索。我们最初检索了分析TTT院前特征的系统综述,然后补充了2019年11月以来TTT原始论文的更新检索。结果:我们筛选了92篇论文,其中鉴定了52例成人普通人群ttt。结果表明,国际上ttt的院前特征存在相当大的异质性。在工具中包含的更高级别类别中存在相似性:工具通常包括对患者生理特征,损伤特征,损伤机制和高危人群的任何修饰物的测量。然而,构成这些群体的院前特征,以及它们如何被应用和解释,发现差异很大。结论:虽然ttt中使用的高水平分类是一致的,但特定变量所采用的阈值差异很大,这可能反映了统计而不是临床考虑。这可能导致国际上重大创伤分诊标准存在相当大的差异。在ttt中使用的院前特征的操作化的商定分类是必要的,以防止在重大创伤分诊中的次优临床决策。注册:PROSPERO CRD42023393094。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between social deprivation index and pedestrian injuries in a suburban setting: Is that the only factor? Risk factors and long-term outcomes in anterior iliac and obturator hip dislocation. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax. Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study. Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1