Comparison of acute pancreatitis and acute on chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002928
Tiago Bouça-Machado, João Paulo Araújo Teixeira, Paula Rebelo, Elisabete Barbosa, Jan Bech Pedersen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Søren Schou Olesen
{"title":"Comparison of acute pancreatitis and acute on chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tiago Bouça-Machado, João Paulo Araújo Teixeira, Paula Rebelo, Elisabete Barbosa, Jan Bech Pedersen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Søren Schou Olesen","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute on chronic pancreatitis (ACP) shares a similar clinical presentation with acute pancreatitis (AP) and is often diagnosed and treated in the same way. However, these two conditions may have distinct clinical risk profiles and prognoses. There is currently limited evidence available regarding the specific characteristics of ACP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of AP or ACP between 2017 and 2019 at two tertiary referral centers. The primary outcome was disease severity as defined by the Atlanta classification. Secondary outcomes included the presence of local and systemic complications, organ failure, ICU admission, and mortality. Differences in outcomes between ACP and AP were compared using multivariate logistic regression models, with results presented as odds ratios (ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1163 patients, 90% of whom had AP and 10% had ACP. ACP patients were predominantly male (81 vs. 46%; P  < 0.001), whereas AP patients were older (mean age 62.6 vs. 56.5 years, P  < 0.001). ACP patients had lower amylase and lipase levels ( P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no difference in the risk of moderate or severe pancreatitis (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.66-1.98; P  = 0.615). ACP patients had a higher risk of local complications (predominantly pseudocysts) (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.00-2.92; P  = 0.049) and a lower risk of organ failure ( P  = 0.019) and ICU admission ( P  = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms previous observations that ACP has a more favorable in-hospital prognosis than AP and extends these findings to a modern European setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"433-438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute on chronic pancreatitis (ACP) shares a similar clinical presentation with acute pancreatitis (AP) and is often diagnosed and treated in the same way. However, these two conditions may have distinct clinical risk profiles and prognoses. There is currently limited evidence available regarding the specific characteristics of ACP.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of AP or ACP between 2017 and 2019 at two tertiary referral centers. The primary outcome was disease severity as defined by the Atlanta classification. Secondary outcomes included the presence of local and systemic complications, organ failure, ICU admission, and mortality. Differences in outcomes between ACP and AP were compared using multivariate logistic regression models, with results presented as odds ratios (ORs).

Results: We included 1163 patients, 90% of whom had AP and 10% had ACP. ACP patients were predominantly male (81 vs. 46%; P  < 0.001), whereas AP patients were older (mean age 62.6 vs. 56.5 years, P  < 0.001). ACP patients had lower amylase and lipase levels ( P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no difference in the risk of moderate or severe pancreatitis (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.66-1.98; P  = 0.615). ACP patients had a higher risk of local complications (predominantly pseudocysts) (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.00-2.92; P  = 0.049) and a lower risk of organ failure ( P  = 0.019) and ICU admission ( P  = 0.005).

Conclusion: Our study confirms previous observations that ACP has a more favorable in-hospital prognosis than AP and extends these findings to a modern European setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎和急性慢性胰腺炎的比较:回顾性队列研究。
背景:急性慢性胰腺炎(ACP)与急性胰腺炎(AP)具有相似的临床表现,并且通常以相同的方式诊断和治疗。然而,这两种情况可能具有不同的临床风险概况和预后。目前关于ACP的具体特征的证据有限。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年至2019年在两个三级转诊中心诊断为AP或ACP的所有成年患者。主要终点是亚特兰大分类定义的疾病严重程度。次要结局包括局部和全身并发症、器官衰竭、ICU住院和死亡率。使用多变量logistic回归模型比较ACP和AP之间的结果差异,结果以比值比(ORs)表示。结果:纳入1163例患者,其中90%为AP, 10%为ACP。ACP患者以男性为主(81对46%;P < 0.001),而AP患者年龄较大(平均年龄62.6岁比56.5岁,P < 0.001)。ACP患者淀粉酶和脂肪酶水平较低(P < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,中度或重度胰腺炎的风险无差异(or, 1.15;95% ci, 0.66-1.98;P = 0.615)。ACP患者发生局部并发症(主要是假性囊肿)的风险较高(OR, 1.71;95% ci, 1.00-2.92;P = 0.049),较低的器官衰竭(P = 0.019)和ICU入院风险(P = 0.005)。结论:我们的研究证实了先前的观察结果,即ACP比AP具有更好的住院预后,并将这些发现扩展到现代欧洲环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
期刊最新文献
Nutrition and the pancreas. Role of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review. Global, regional, and national burden of liver cancer due to hepatitis B, 1990-2021 and projections to 2051: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Eosinophilic esophagitis is the leading cause of dysphagia in an outpatient setting. Correlating endoscopic findings with pathology to optimize biopsy strategies in gastritis: insights from a large cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1