Natasha Janko, Ammar Majeed, Isabella Commins, Paul Gow, William Kemp, Stuart K Roberts
{"title":"Rotational thromboelastometry predicts transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Natasha Janko, Ammar Majeed, Isabella Commins, Paul Gow, William Kemp, Stuart K Roberts","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is superior to conventional haemostatic tests in the assessment and management of bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Whether ROTEM may also be useful for assessing the prognosis of these patients is unknown. We aimed to explore the role of ROTEM in predicting the transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis at baseline and were followed up until death, liver transplantation or the end of follow-up (28 February 2023). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the association between transplant-free survivals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2018 and October 2021, 162 patients with cirrhosis were recruited and followed-up for a median of 42 months. During follow-up, 36 patients died and 7 underwent liver transplantation. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in the death/liver transplant group compared to the survivor group (52 vs. 57, P = 0.02; and 51 vs. 55, P = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, care setting, bilirubin, sodium and creatinine, only albumin (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P = 0.018) and MCF EXT (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.032) remained significant predictors of transplant-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROTEM may be useful in assessing the survival of patients with cirrhosis. Further research is needed to determine the clinical utility of ROTEM parameters as prognostic markers in cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"510-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Emerging evidence suggests that rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is superior to conventional haemostatic tests in the assessment and management of bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Whether ROTEM may also be useful for assessing the prognosis of these patients is unknown. We aimed to explore the role of ROTEM in predicting the transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis at baseline and were followed up until death, liver transplantation or the end of follow-up (28 February 2023). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the association between transplant-free survivals.
Results: Between April 2018 and October 2021, 162 patients with cirrhosis were recruited and followed-up for a median of 42 months. During follow-up, 36 patients died and 7 underwent liver transplantation. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in the death/liver transplant group compared to the survivor group (52 vs. 57, P = 0.02; and 51 vs. 55, P = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, care setting, bilirubin, sodium and creatinine, only albumin (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P = 0.018) and MCF EXT (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.032) remained significant predictors of transplant-free survival.
Conclusion: ROTEM may be useful in assessing the survival of patients with cirrhosis. Further research is needed to determine the clinical utility of ROTEM parameters as prognostic markers in cirrhosis.
背景和目的:新出现的证据表明,旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)在评估和管理肝硬化患者出血风险方面优于传统的止血试验。ROTEM是否也可用于评估这些患者的预后尚不清楚。我们的目的是探讨ROTEM在预测肝硬化患者无移植生存中的作用。方法:我们对两家医院的肝硬化患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。所有患者在基线时进行ROTEM分析,并随访至死亡、肝移植或随访结束(2023年2月28日)。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析探讨无移植存活率之间的关系。结果:在2018年4月至2021年10月期间,招募了162名肝硬化患者,随访时间中位数为42个月。随访期间,36例死亡,7例行肝移植。单因素分析显示,与存活组相比,死亡/肝移植组使用EXTEM和INTEM试验的最大凝块硬度(MCF)显著降低(52 vs. 57, P = 0.02;51 vs. 55, P = 0.01)。在调整了年龄、性别、是否存在临床意义的门脉高压症、肝细胞癌、护理环境、胆红素、钠和肌酐等因素后,只有白蛋白(风险比:0.92,95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P = 0.018)和MCFEXT(风险比:0.96,95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.032)仍然是无移植生存的显著预测因子。结论:ROTEM可用于评估肝硬化患者的生存。需要进一步的研究来确定ROTEM参数作为肝硬化预后指标的临床应用。
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.