Rotational thromboelastometry predicts transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002920
Natasha Janko, Ammar Majeed, Isabella Commins, Paul Gow, William Kemp, Stuart K Roberts
{"title":"Rotational thromboelastometry predicts transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Natasha Janko, Ammar Majeed, Isabella Commins, Paul Gow, William Kemp, Stuart K Roberts","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is superior to conventional haemostatic tests in the assessment and management of bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Whether ROTEM may also be useful for assessing the prognosis of these patients is unknown. We aimed to explore the role of ROTEM in predicting the transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis at baseline and were followed up until death, liver transplantation or the end of follow-up (28 February 2023). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the association between transplant-free survivals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2018 and October 2021, 162 patients with cirrhosis were recruited and followed-up for a median of 42 months. During follow-up, 36 patients died and 7 underwent liver transplantation. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in the death/liver transplant group compared to the survivor group (52 vs. 57, P  = 0.02; and 51 vs. 55, P  = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, care setting, bilirubin, sodium and creatinine, only albumin (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P  = 0.018) and MCF EXT (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P  = 0.032) remained significant predictors of transplant-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROTEM may be useful in assessing the survival of patients with cirrhosis. Further research is needed to determine the clinical utility of ROTEM parameters as prognostic markers in cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"510-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Emerging evidence suggests that rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is superior to conventional haemostatic tests in the assessment and management of bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Whether ROTEM may also be useful for assessing the prognosis of these patients is unknown. We aimed to explore the role of ROTEM in predicting the transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis at baseline and were followed up until death, liver transplantation or the end of follow-up (28 February 2023). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the association between transplant-free survivals.

Results: Between April 2018 and October 2021, 162 patients with cirrhosis were recruited and followed-up for a median of 42 months. During follow-up, 36 patients died and 7 underwent liver transplantation. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in the death/liver transplant group compared to the survivor group (52 vs. 57, P  = 0.02; and 51 vs. 55, P  = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, care setting, bilirubin, sodium and creatinine, only albumin (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P  = 0.018) and MCF EXT (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P  = 0.032) remained significant predictors of transplant-free survival.

Conclusion: ROTEM may be useful in assessing the survival of patients with cirrhosis. Further research is needed to determine the clinical utility of ROTEM parameters as prognostic markers in cirrhosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋转血栓弹性测量预测肝硬化患者无移植生存。
背景和目的:新出现的证据表明,旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)在评估和管理肝硬化患者出血风险方面优于传统的止血试验。ROTEM是否也可用于评估这些患者的预后尚不清楚。我们的目的是探讨ROTEM在预测肝硬化患者无移植生存中的作用。方法:我们对两家医院的肝硬化患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。所有患者在基线时进行ROTEM分析,并随访至死亡、肝移植或随访结束(2023年2月28日)。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析探讨无移植存活率之间的关系。结果:在2018年4月至2021年10月期间,招募了162名肝硬化患者,随访时间中位数为42个月。随访期间,36例死亡,7例行肝移植。单因素分析显示,与存活组相比,死亡/肝移植组使用EXTEM和INTEM试验的最大凝块硬度(MCF)显著降低(52 vs. 57, P = 0.02;51 vs. 55, P = 0.01)。在调整了年龄、性别、是否存在临床意义的门脉高压症、肝细胞癌、护理环境、胆红素、钠和肌酐等因素后,只有白蛋白(风险比:0.92,95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P = 0.018)和MCFEXT(风险比:0.96,95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.032)仍然是无移植生存的显著预测因子。结论:ROTEM可用于评估肝硬化患者的生存。需要进一步的研究来确定ROTEM参数作为肝硬化预后指标的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
期刊最新文献
Development of a retinal vascular nomogram for predicting hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: insights into extrahepatic microcirculatory dysfunctions. Dissecting causal relationships between inflammatory factors, plasma metabolites, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a mediating Mendelian randomization study. Presence of alarm symptoms at coeliac disease diagnosis is not associated with poorer long-term treatment outcomes. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose phase 1 study of VE202, a defined bacterial consortium for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: safety and colonization dynamics of a novel live biotherapeutic product in healthy adults. Effect of multistrain probiotics on symptom severity in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of irritable bowel syndrome-symptom severity score outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1