Ori Tal, Meirav Schmidt, Rachelli Fried, Osnat Elyashiv, Ohad Feldstein, Yakir Segev, Ofer Lavie, Tally Levy
{"title":"Pre-operative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can help predict residual disease after primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"Ori Tal, Meirav Schmidt, Rachelli Fried, Osnat Elyashiv, Ohad Feldstein, Yakir Segev, Ofer Lavie, Tally Levy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.101617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The success of surgery in ovarian cancer is based on achieving complete cytoreduction. In order to achieve the best outcomes, patients are triaged into either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Current methods using computed tomography (CT) scans have limited accuracy in predicting optimal cytoreduction outcomes. This study investigated whether pre-operative blood count markers of inflammation could predict optimal cytoreduction, aiding in the triaging decision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with ovarian cancer stage IIIc to IV, treated at two medical centers in Israel between 2003 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those undergoing primary operation and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Pre-operative complete blood counts were used to calculate neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Statistical analyses were used to determine optimal cutoff values of hematologic markers to predict the likelihood of achieving optimal cytoreduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 282 women fit the inclusion criteria, of which 133 underwent primary surgery and 149 had interval debulking surgery. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio was the only hematologic marker found to be significantly correlated with patient designation based on CT scans. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio cutoff value of 177 was identified as the optimal threshold (area under the curve 0.628, 95% CI 0.562 to 0.693, p < .001). Patients with levels >177 had significantly lower rates of complete debulking (R0) compared to those with levels ≤177 (33.3% vs 52.9%, p = .023) CONCLUSIONS: A platelet-lymphocyte ratio of 177 may serve as an adjunct marker alongside CT imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer patients. Prospective studies are required to validate these findings and explore the integration of platelet-lymphocyte ratio into existing predictive models.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"101617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.101617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The success of surgery in ovarian cancer is based on achieving complete cytoreduction. In order to achieve the best outcomes, patients are triaged into either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Current methods using computed tomography (CT) scans have limited accuracy in predicting optimal cytoreduction outcomes. This study investigated whether pre-operative blood count markers of inflammation could predict optimal cytoreduction, aiding in the triaging decision.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with ovarian cancer stage IIIc to IV, treated at two medical centers in Israel between 2003 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those undergoing primary operation and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Pre-operative complete blood counts were used to calculate neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Statistical analyses were used to determine optimal cutoff values of hematologic markers to predict the likelihood of achieving optimal cytoreduction.
Results: Overall, 282 women fit the inclusion criteria, of which 133 underwent primary surgery and 149 had interval debulking surgery. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio was the only hematologic marker found to be significantly correlated with patient designation based on CT scans. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio cutoff value of 177 was identified as the optimal threshold (area under the curve 0.628, 95% CI 0.562 to 0.693, p < .001). Patients with levels >177 had significantly lower rates of complete debulking (R0) compared to those with levels ≤177 (33.3% vs 52.9%, p = .023) CONCLUSIONS: A platelet-lymphocyte ratio of 177 may serve as an adjunct marker alongside CT imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer patients. Prospective studies are required to validate these findings and explore the integration of platelet-lymphocyte ratio into existing predictive models.
目的:卵巢癌手术成功的基础是实现完全的细胞减少。为了达到最好的结果,患者被分类为要么进行初始减积手术,要么进行新辅助化疗,然后进行间隔减积手术。目前使用计算机断层扫描(CT)的方法在预测最佳细胞减少结果方面的准确性有限。本研究调查了术前炎症的血细胞计数标记物是否可以预测最佳的细胞减少,帮助分诊决策。方法:我们对2003年至2019年期间在以色列两家医疗中心接受治疗的IIIc至IV期卵巢癌患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。患者分为首次手术组和接受新辅助化疗后间隔减容手术组。术前全血计数计算中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值。统计分析用于确定血液学标志物的最佳截止值,以预测实现最佳细胞减少的可能性。结果:总的来说,282名妇女符合纳入标准,其中133人接受了初次手术,149人接受了间歇减容手术。血小板淋巴细胞比率是唯一发现与基于CT扫描的患者名称显著相关的血液学标志物。血小板-淋巴细胞比值截断值为177为最佳阈值(曲线下面积0.628,95% CI 0.562 ~ 0.693, p < 0.001)。与水平≤177的患者相比,> - 177水平的患者完全减体积(R0)率显著降低(33.3% vs 52.9%, p = 0.023)。结论:177的血小板淋巴细胞比可以作为辅助标志物,与CT成像一起预测卵巢癌患者最佳的细胞减体积。需要前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并探索将血小板-淋巴细胞比例整合到现有的预测模型中。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.