Diagnostic value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for adnexal masses.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100049
Cai Tian, Yi-Wei Han, Zi-Jia Shi, Ya-Wei Li, Lei Xie, Xiao-Li Liu, Jing-Qiao Liu
{"title":"Diagnostic value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for adnexal masses.","authors":"Cai Tian, Yi-Wei Han, Zi-Jia Shi, Ya-Wei Li, Lei Xie, Xiao-Li Liu, Jing-Qiao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 179 patients with adnexal masses who underwent pre-operative ultrasound. The IOTA simple rules were applied first, followed by CEUS for inconclusive or suspicious cases. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the IOTA simple rules alone and combined with CEUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 179 adnexal masses, 113 (63.1%) were benign and 66 (36.9%) were malignant or borderline. The IOTA simple rules alone achieved 86.8% sensitivity, 95.6% specificity, and 92.3% accuracy. When combined with CEUS, sensitivity increased to 92.7%, specificity to 98.3%, and accuracy to 96.2%. Sub-group analysis showed that the combined approach was particularly beneficial in women who were pre-menopausal, with sensitivity rising from 71.4% to 85.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the IOTA simple rules with CEUS significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign from malignant adnexal masses, especially in inconclusive cases. This approach may enhance management across age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100049"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.

Methods: This retrospective study included 179 patients with adnexal masses who underwent pre-operative ultrasound. The IOTA simple rules were applied first, followed by CEUS for inconclusive or suspicious cases. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the IOTA simple rules alone and combined with CEUS.

Results: Among the 179 adnexal masses, 113 (63.1%) were benign and 66 (36.9%) were malignant or borderline. The IOTA simple rules alone achieved 86.8% sensitivity, 95.6% specificity, and 92.3% accuracy. When combined with CEUS, sensitivity increased to 92.7%, specificity to 98.3%, and accuracy to 96.2%. Sub-group analysis showed that the combined approach was particularly beneficial in women who were pre-menopausal, with sensitivity rising from 71.4% to 85.7%.

Conclusion: Combining the IOTA simple rules with CEUS significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign from malignant adnexal masses, especially in inconclusive cases. This approach may enhance management across age groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Health care organization for gynecologic oncology patients fleeing Ukraine: Insights from the European Network of Young Gyne Oncologists survey during the first six months of the military conflict. Horseshoe kidney. Improving pre-operative binary grading: relevance of p53 and PR expression in grade 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Assessment of readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trials literature at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Selective systematic nerve-sparing type C2 radical hysterectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1