{"title":"Surgery for foreign body retrieval from airway after failed bronchoscopy intervention-a decade-long experience.","authors":"Haroon Shakir, Gopal Karunanithy Jaikaran, Ezhil Nambi Sundaramoorthy, Kathirvel Balasubramani, Naveen Elangovan, Krishnan Ganapathy Subramaniam, Dhruva Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s12055-024-01845-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foreign body aspiration is a critical surgical emergency among pediatric patients, carrying a substantial risk of mortality and contributing significantly to respiratory distress in children. Timely intervention by experts is crucial to mitigating cumulative morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bronchotomy as a secure alternative following unsuccessful attempts at bronchoscopic foreign body retrieval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 21 instances involving bronchotomies and resections carried out following unsuccessful bronchoscopic foreign body extraction was conducted between June 2013 and March 2022. The posterolateral thoracotomy approach was employed for surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 cases underwent bronchotomy and resectional procedures, with a retrospective follow-up spanning 10 years. Patient ages ranged from 1 to 12 years, predominantly affecting the left lung. Bronchotomy was chosen as the intervention in 85% (18 cases) of instances. The incision was extended towards the foreign body in 8 cases involving the right bronchus and in 13 cases for the left bronchus. Late presenters commonly exhibit hemoptysis. Objects retrieved ranged from pen caps and whistles to metal balls. All enrolled cases underwent preoperative bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of rigid bronchoscopy as the diagnostic and primary intervention for foreign body aspirations in pediatric cases. Bronchotomy emerges as a secure and effective alternative. Retained foreign bodies causing endobronchial obstruction with stasis necessitate resection, while bronchotomy is a safe procedure for non-retrievable foreign bodies without structural changes.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01845-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 3","pages":"281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01845-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Foreign body aspiration is a critical surgical emergency among pediatric patients, carrying a substantial risk of mortality and contributing significantly to respiratory distress in children. Timely intervention by experts is crucial to mitigating cumulative morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bronchotomy as a secure alternative following unsuccessful attempts at bronchoscopic foreign body retrieval.
Methods: A retrospective review of 21 instances involving bronchotomies and resections carried out following unsuccessful bronchoscopic foreign body extraction was conducted between June 2013 and March 2022. The posterolateral thoracotomy approach was employed for surgical interventions.
Results: A total of 21 cases underwent bronchotomy and resectional procedures, with a retrospective follow-up spanning 10 years. Patient ages ranged from 1 to 12 years, predominantly affecting the left lung. Bronchotomy was chosen as the intervention in 85% (18 cases) of instances. The incision was extended towards the foreign body in 8 cases involving the right bronchus and in 13 cases for the left bronchus. Late presenters commonly exhibit hemoptysis. Objects retrieved ranged from pen caps and whistles to metal balls. All enrolled cases underwent preoperative bronchoscopy.
Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of rigid bronchoscopy as the diagnostic and primary intervention for foreign body aspirations in pediatric cases. Bronchotomy emerges as a secure and effective alternative. Retained foreign bodies causing endobronchial obstruction with stasis necessitate resection, while bronchotomy is a safe procedure for non-retrievable foreign bodies without structural changes.
Graphical abstract:
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01845-z.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.