Ovarian-stimulating drug use and risk of ovarian tumor in infertile women: a meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100046
Hong Li, Zhonghua Hu, Yuyan Fan, Yingying Hao
{"title":"Ovarian-stimulating drug use and risk of ovarian tumor in infertile women: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Hong Li, Zhonghua Hu, Yuyan Fan, Yingying Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore whether ovarian-stimulating drugs increase the risk of ovarian cancer in infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis involved searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. The methodological quality of observational studies was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were summarized as OR with 95% CIs. The primary objective was to assess the effect of ovarian-stimulating drugs on ovarian tumors and the secondary objective was to assess this effect in different sub-groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Overall, compared with unexposed infertile women and unexposed general population, ovarian-stimulating drugs increased the risk of invasive ovarian cancer (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.32, p =.001) and borderline cancer (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.47, p < .001) in women receiving any fertility drugs. Our sub-group analysis showed a higher risk of both invasive and borderline ovarian cancer in infertile women using ovarian-stimulating drugs compared to infertile women with no exposure and the general unexposed population. An increased risk of ovarian cancer was observed in nulliparous women, but not in parous women. In addition, a cumulative clomiphene dose of <900 mg and a number of gonadotropin cycles ≥6 were factors that increased the risk of invasive ovarian cancer. Combined treatment with clomiphene and gonadotropin was associated with an increased risk of borderline cancer. Risk analyses further revealed that prolonged use of oral contraceptives (>60 months) and a family history of ovarian cancer significantly increased the odds of developing ovarian cancer among women treated with ovarian-stimulating drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that ovarian-stimulating drugs increased the risk of ovarian tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore whether ovarian-stimulating drugs increase the risk of ovarian cancer in infertile women.

Methods: This meta-analysis involved searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. The methodological quality of observational studies was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were summarized as OR with 95% CIs. The primary objective was to assess the effect of ovarian-stimulating drugs on ovarian tumors and the secondary objective was to assess this effect in different sub-groups.

Results: Forty studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Overall, compared with unexposed infertile women and unexposed general population, ovarian-stimulating drugs increased the risk of invasive ovarian cancer (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.32, p =.001) and borderline cancer (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.47, p < .001) in women receiving any fertility drugs. Our sub-group analysis showed a higher risk of both invasive and borderline ovarian cancer in infertile women using ovarian-stimulating drugs compared to infertile women with no exposure and the general unexposed population. An increased risk of ovarian cancer was observed in nulliparous women, but not in parous women. In addition, a cumulative clomiphene dose of <900 mg and a number of gonadotropin cycles ≥6 were factors that increased the risk of invasive ovarian cancer. Combined treatment with clomiphene and gonadotropin was associated with an increased risk of borderline cancer. Risk analyses further revealed that prolonged use of oral contraceptives (>60 months) and a family history of ovarian cancer significantly increased the odds of developing ovarian cancer among women treated with ovarian-stimulating drugs.

Conclusion: Our study showed that ovarian-stimulating drugs increased the risk of ovarian tumors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不孕妇女使用促卵巢药物与卵巢肿瘤风险的meta分析
目的:探讨促卵巢药物是否会增加不孕妇女患卵巢癌的风险。方法:meta分析包括检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase。观察性研究的方法学质量采用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。数据汇总为OR, 95% ci。主要目的是评估促卵巢药物对卵巢肿瘤的影响,次要目的是评估不同亚组的效果。结果:40项研究符合此荟萃分析。总的来说,与未服用任何生育药物的不孕妇女和未服用任何生育药物的普通人群相比,卵巢刺激药物增加了接受任何生育药物的妇女患侵袭性卵巢癌(OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.14至1.32,p = 0.001)和边缘性癌症(OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.19至1.47,p < 0.001)的风险。我们的亚组分析显示,使用促卵巢药物的不孕妇女患侵袭性和交界性卵巢癌的风险高于未使用促卵巢药物的不孕妇女和未使用促卵巢药物的一般人群。在未生育妇女中观察到卵巢癌的风险增加,但在已生育妇女中没有。此外,服用克罗米芬累计剂量为60个月和有卵巢癌家族史的妇女在接受促卵巢药物治疗时患卵巢癌的几率显著增加。结论:本研究表明促卵巢药物增加卵巢肿瘤发生的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Letter in response to correspondence on "Comparative analysis of adjuvant treatment outcomes in stage III endometrial cancer: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, site of primary recurrence, and toxicity" by Fang & Hu. Avoidance of adjuvant radiotherapy in inter mediate-risk endometrial carcinoma. Challenging the standard in early-stage ovarian cancer: current evidence and a standardized framework for sentinel node mapping. De-escalation in stage IC epithelial ovarian cancer: adjuvant treatment. Key considerations for safe de-escalation of therapy for POLE mutated endometrial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1